Teaching and Student Achievement in Science: A Comparison of Three Different Schedule Types

References

• AndersonR.MitchenerC.GabelD.Research on science teacher educationHandbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning1994New YorkMacMillan344
   Google Scholar
• AverettC. P.Block scheduling in North Carolina high schools1994Raleigh, NCNorth Carolina Department ofPUBLIC Instruction
   Google Scholar
• BatesonD.J.Science achievement in semester and all-year coursesJournal of Research in Science Teaching1990273233240
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F. & Krajcik, J. (Eds.). (1994). What are appropriate relationships between practice and research in science teaching? Report from the Science Education Research Agenda (SERAC) Working Conference at the National Center for Science Teaching and Learning, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F. & White, A. L. (1998). The influence of action research — Specific examples and situational factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• BevevinoM. M.SnodgrassD. M.AdamsK. M.DengelJ. A.An educator's guide to block scheduling: Decision making, curriculum design, and lesson planning strategies1998BostonAllyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• BoarmanG. L.KirkpatrickB. S.The hybrid schedule: Scheduling to the curriculumNASSP Bulletin1995795714252
   Google Scholar
• BuckmanD. C.KingB. B.RyanS.Block scheduling: A means to improve school climateNASSP Bulletin199579571918
   Google Scholar
• CanadyR. L.RettigM. D.Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high school1995Princeton, NJEye on Education
   Google Scholar
• CanadyR. L.RettigM. D.Teaching in the block: Strategies for engaging active learners1996Princeton, NJEye on Education
   Google Scholar
• CarrollJ. M.The Copernican Plan evaluated: The evolution of a revolutionPhi Delta Kappan199576104110
   Google Scholar
• ChienI.CookS.W.HardingJ.The field of action researchAmerican Psychologist1948314350
   Google Scholar
• CoreyS.Action research to improve school practices1953New YorkTeachers College Press
   Google Scholar
• CubanL.How teacher taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms: 1890–199019932nd Ed.New YorkTeachers College Press
   Google Scholar
• EdwardsC.The 4 X 4 planEducational Leadership19935331619
   Google Scholar
• EinederD. V.BishopH.L.Block scheduling the high school: The effects on achievement, behavior, and student-teacher relationshipsNASSP Bulletin1997815894554
   Google Scholar
• EisnerE. W.Who decides what schools teacher?Phi Delta Kappan1990713523526
   Google Scholar
• FeldmanA.Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action researchJournal of Research in Science Teaching199633512540
   Google Scholar
• HamiltonM.L.Relevant readings in action researchAction in Teacher Education19951647981
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., Wronkovich, M., & Robinson, J. (1998). Measured outcomes of learning in the block. Manuscript submitted forPUBLICation.
   Google Scholar
• HoltensteinD. S.Intensive scheduling1998Thousand Oaks, CACorwin Press
   Google Scholar
• KincheloeJ. L.Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as path to empowerment1991New YorkFalmer Press
   Google Scholar
• KoballaT.Two communities: One challengeNARST News199740234
   Google Scholar
• KramerS. L.What we know about block scheduling and its effects on math instructionNASSP Bulletin1997815896982
   Google Scholar
• KramerS. L.Block scheduling and high school mathematics instructionThe Mathematics Teacher1996899758768
   Google Scholar
• KyleW. C.LinnM. C.BitnerB. L.MitchenerC. P.PerryB.The role of research in science teaching: An NSTA theme paperScience Education199175413418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiebermanA.Collaborative research: Working with, not working onEducational Leadership19864352832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LockwoodS.Semesterizing the high school schedule: the impact of student achievement in Algebra and GeometryNASSP Bulletin199579575102108
   Google Scholar
• LytleS.L.Cochran-SmithM.Teacher research as a way of knowingHarvard Education Review199262447474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallM.TaylorA.BatesonD.BrigdenS.The British Columbia assessment of mathematics and science: Preliminary report1995Victoria, BCBritish Columbia Ministry of Education
   Google Scholar
• McKernanJ.Action research and curriculum developmentPeabody Journal of Education1987642619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiffJ.Acton research: Principles and practice1992LondonRoutledge
   Google Scholar
• MilesM.HubermanA.Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods1984Beverly Hills, CASAGEPUBLICations
   Google Scholar
• Munroe, M. J. (1989). BLOCK successful alternative format addressing learner needs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Block scheduling: Teaching strategies for the restructured school day1997USAKirby Lithographic Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blocked scheduled high school achievement: Comparison of 1995 end-of-course test scores for blocked and non-blocked high schools1996Raleigh, NCEvaluation Services Section, Division of Accountability
   Google Scholar
• OjaS.SmullyanL.Collaborative action research: A developmental approach1989LondonFalmer Press
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. & Reynolds, K. E. (1995). Establishing an action research agenda for preservice and inservice elementary teacher collaboration on self-empowerment in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• PedrettiE.Learning about science, technology, and society (STS) through an action research project: Co-constructing an issues-based model for STS educationSchool Science and Mathematics199696432440
   Google Scholar
• PedrettiE.HodsonD.From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action researchJournal of Research in Science Teaching199532463486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PekarekR.KrockoverG. H.ShepardsonD. P.Guest Editorial. The research — practice gap in science educationJournal of Research in Science Teaching199633111113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, S. L., Morse, J., & Varrella, G. F. (1998). A second look at block scheduling. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association of Science Teachers, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• QueenJ.A.IsenhourK. G.The 4x4 block schedule1998New YorkEye on Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• RaphaelD.WahlstromM.W.McLeanL.D.Debunking the semestering mythCanadian Journal of Education19861113652
   Google Scholar
• RettigM. D.CanadyR. L.All around the block: The benefits and challenges of a non-traditional school scheduleThe School Administrator199685316
   Google Scholar
• RichardsonV.Conducting research on practiceEducational Researcher1994235510
   Google Scholar
• SchoensteinR.The new school on the block scheduleThe Executive Educator19951781821
   Google Scholar
• SchonD.The reflective practitioner1983New YorkBasic Books
   Google Scholar
• Sessoms, J. C. (1995). Teachers perceptions of three models of high school block scheduling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
   Google Scholar
• Shymanski, J. A. & Kyle, W. C. (1991). Establishing a research agenda: The critical issues of science curriculum reform. Report of a conference held April 8, 1990, sponsored by the National Association for Research in Science Teaching and funded by the National Science Foundation, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• SirotnikK.SirotnikK.GoodladJ.The meaning and conduct of inquiry in school-university partnerships. School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns1988New YorkTeachers College Press169190
   Google Scholar
• Stepans, J. I., & Miller, K. W. (1992). Teacher, administrator and science educator form a TRIAD. Paper presented at the Area Conference of the National Science Teachers Association, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• StringerE.Action research: A handbook for practitioners1996Thousand Oaks, CASagePUBLICations, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, B. M. (1996). Perceived staff needs of teachers in high schools with block schedules. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
   Google Scholar
• TannerD.The social consequences of bad researchPhi Delta Kappan1998331345349
   Google Scholar
• Block schedules and student performance on AP ExaminationsResearch News, RN-031998New YorkCollege Entrance Examination Board
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education, Professional Development Team (1995). Mission and principles of professional development. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• VealW.TippiinsD.RhotonJ.BowersP.Action research: Creating a context for science teaching and learningIssues in science education1996Arlington, VANational Science Teachers Association7884
   Google Scholar
• VitaleM.R.RomanceN.Evolution of a collaborative school research project as a prototype environment for empowering teacher action research: Results and implicationsFlorida Journal of Educational Research19943414350
   Google Scholar
• WhiteR.T.TisherR.P.WittrockM. C.Research on natural sciencesHandbook of research on teaching19863rd ed.New York, NYMacmillan Publishing Company874905
   Google Scholar
• Wild, R. D. (April, 1998). Science achievement and block schedules. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• WronkovichM.HessC. A.RobinsonJ. E.An objective look at math outcomes based on new research into block schedulingNASSP Bulletin1997815933241
   Google Scholar
• WubbelsT.BrekelmansM.A comparison of student perceptions of Dutch physics teachers' interpersonal behavior and their educational opinions in 1984 and 1993Journal of Research in Science Teaching199734447466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar