The New Rhetoric's Argument Schemes: A Rhetorical View of Practical Reasoning

References

• Dearin, R. D. (1982). Perelman's concept of “quasilogical” argument: A critical elaboration. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 78–94). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. B. (1986). Reason and rhetorical practice: The inventional agenda of Chaim Perelman. In J. L. Golden & J. J. Pilotta (Eds.), Practical reasoning in human affairs (pp. 259–86). Dordrecht Holland: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, J. L. (1986). The universal audience revisited. In J. L. Golden & J. J. Pilotta (Eds.), Practical reasoning in human affairs (pp. 287–304). Dordrecht Holland: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 6, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick, J. A. (1991). Critical thinking: The analysis of arguments. Scottsdale AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Karon, L. A. (1976). Presence in The new rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric , 9, 96–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katula, R. A. (1983). Communication: Writing and speaking. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, S. K. , & Hughes, D. T. (1986). The rational and the reasonable: Dialectic or parallel systems? In J. L. Golden & J. S. Pilotta (Eds.), Practical reasoning in human affairs (pp. 187–205). Dordrecht Holland: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. E. (1982). Rationality and reasonableness in a theory of argument. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 105–22). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Measell, J. S. (1985). Perelman on analogy. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1979). Les Couples philoso- phiques: Une nouvelle approche. Revue internationale de philosophic , 33, 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1951). Act and person in argument. Ethics , 61, 251–69.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1958). Self evidence and proof. Philosophy , 33, 289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric ( W. Kluback , Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1984). The new rhetoric and the rhetoricians: Remembrances and comments. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 70, 188–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation ( J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver , Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. W. (1978). Perelman's universal audience. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 64, 361–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E. (1985). Dissociation in the arguments of rhetorical theory. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Scult, A. (1976). Perelman's universal audience: One perspective. Central States Speech Journal , 27, 176–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. , McPhee, R. D. , Poole, M. S. , Tanita, N. E. & Canary, D. J. (1981). Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes. In G. Ziegelmueller & Rhodes (Eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 663–92). Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H. , & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht Holland: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H. , Grootendorst, R. , & Kruiger, T. (1984). The study of argumentation. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. B. , & Sillars, M. O. (1990). Where is argument? Perelman's theory of values. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.). Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 134–50). Prospect Heights IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, J. W. (1990). Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic, logic. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.) Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 9–26). Prospect Heights IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar