9
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Third 1992 Presidential Debate: Channel and Commentary Effects

, &
Pages 106-118 | Published online: 18 Dec 2017

References

  • Becker, L. , McCombs, M. , & McLeod, J. (1975). The development of political cognitions. In S. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication: Issues and strategies for research (pp. 137–66. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Becker, L. B. , Sobowale, I. A. , Cobbey, R. E. , & Cyal, C. H. (1978). Debates' effects on voters' understanding of candidates and issues. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral and policy perspectives (pp. 126–139. New York: Praeger.
  • Biocca, F. , & David, P. (1989). Micro-shifts in audience opinions: A second-by-second analysis of the first 1988 presidential debate at Winston-Salem. Unpublished manuscript. Center for Research in Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Bystrom, D. , Roper, C. , Gobetz, R. , Massey, T. , & Beall, C. (1991). The effects of a televised gubernatorial debate. Political Communication Review , 16, 57–80.
  • Cohen, A. (1976). Radio vs. TV: The effects of the medium. Journal of Communication , 26, 29–35.
  • Drew, D. , & Weaver, D. (1991). Voter leaning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates and the media matter. Journalism Quarterly , 68, 27–37.
  • Hellweg, S. A. , Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America . New York: Praeger.
  • Kaid, L. L. (1981). Political advertising. In D. Nimmo & K. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 249–271. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kaid, L. L. , & Boydston, J. (1987). An experimental study of the effectiveness of negative political advertisements. Communication Quarterly , 35, 193–201.
  • Katz, E. , & Feldman, J. (1962). The debates in light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 173–223. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1979). Presidential candidate “debates”: What can we learn from 1969? In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 1–50. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • Kraus, S. , (1988). Televised presidential debates and public policy . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kraus, S. , & Smith, R. G. (1962). Issues and images. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 289–312. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Lowry, D. T. , Bridges, J. A. , & Barefield, P. A. (1990). Effects of TV “instant analysis and querulous criticism”: Following the first Bush-Dukakis debate. Journalism Quarterly , 68, 814–825.
  • Mazo, E. , Moos, M. , Hoffman, H. , & Wheeler, H. (1962). The great debates: An occasional paper on the role of the political process in a free society . Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media . New York: New American Library.
  • Mickelson, S. (1972). Face to face: The televised debate. In S. Mickelson (Ed.), The electric mirror (pp. 193–216. New York: Dodd, Mead.
  • Miller, A. , Miller, W. , Raine, A. , & Brown, T. (1976). A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election. American Political Science Review , 70, 735–758.
  • Mitchell, L. M. (1979). Background paper. In with the nation watching: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on televised presidential debates (pp. 17–105. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Company.
  • Morello, J. T. (1988). Visual structuring of the 1976 and 1984 nationally televised presidential debates: Implications. Central States Speech Journal , 39, 233–243.
  • Ritter, K. , & Henry, D. (1990). The 1980 Reagan-Carter presidential debate. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates, 1960–1988 (pp. 69–73). New York: Praeger.
  • Roberts, C. (1979). Media use and difficulty of decision in the 1976 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly , 56, 784–802.
  • Rowland, R. (1986). The substance of the 1980 Carter-Reagan debate. The Southern Speech Communication Journal , 51, 142–165.
  • Sanders, K. R. , & Pace, T. J. (1977). The influence of speech communication on the image of a political candidate: “Limited effects” revisited. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1 (pp. 465–474. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Sears, D. O. , & Chaffee, S. (1979). In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford , 1976 (pp. 223–261). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Sears, D. , Freedman, J. , & O'Connor, E. (1964). The effects of anticipated debate and commitment on the polarization of audience opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly , 28, 615–627.
  • Siepmann, C. A. (1977). Were they “great”? In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 132–141. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Steeper, F. T. (1980). Public response to Gerald Ford's statements on Eastern Europe in the second debate. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 81–101. New York: Praeger.
  • Tannenbaum, P. H. , Greenberg, B. S. , & Silverman, F. R. (1962). Candidate images. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 271–288. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Tiemens, R. K. (1978). Television's portrayal of the 1976 presidential debates: An analysis of visual content. Communication Monographs , 45, 362–370.
  • Vancil, D. L. , & Pendell, S. D. (1987). The myth of viewer-listener disagreement in the first Kennedy-Nixon debates. Central States Speech Journal , 38, 16–27.
  • White, T. (1961). The making of a president : 1960. New York: Atheneum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.