Argumentative Flexibility as a Factor Influencing Message Response Style to Argumentative and Aggressive Arguers

References

• Ajzen, L. , & Fishbein, M. (1974). Factors influencing intentions and the intentions-behavior relations. Human Relations , 27, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, L. , & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin , 84, 888–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, J. L. (1982). The impact of construct system and impression formation in persuasion contexts. Communication Monographs , 49, 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, P.J. , & Benoit, W.L. (1990). To argue or not to argue. In R. Trapp and J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation ,(pp.55–72), Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cegala, D.J. , Savage, G.T. , Bruner, C.C. , & Conrad, A.B. (1982). An elaboration of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical construct. Communication Monographs , 49, 229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ehninger, D. (1970). Argument as method: Its nature, its limitations, and its uses. Speech Monographs , 37, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, J. K. , & Komorita, S. S. (1975). Reciprocity and concession-making in bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31, 864–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, J. (1961). Defensive communication. Journal of Communication , 11, 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (1977). Testing a model of value argument and evidence. Communication Monographs , 44, 106–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (1985). A third perspective on argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric , 18, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D. , & Dallinger, J. M. (1987). Individual differences in cognitive editing standards. Human Communication Research , 31, 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R.P. , & Burks, D.M. (1972). Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction. Communication Monographs , 39, 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R.P. , Carlson, R.E. , & Eadie, W.F. (1980). Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity. Communication Monographs , 46, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D.A. (1980). Verbal Plans: A conceptualization and investigation. Communication Quarterly , 28, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1981). Trait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument. Central States Speech Journal , 32, 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1982). The argumentative student in the speech communication classroom: An investigation and implications. Communication Education , 31, 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D.A. (1988). Arguing constructively . Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1989). Responses to high argumentatives: Message and sex differences. Southern Communication Journal , 54, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. , & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality and Assessment , 46, 72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. , Trebing, J. D. , Shephard, P. E. , & Seeds, D. E. (1984). The relationship of argumentativeness to verbal aggression. Southern Speech Communication Journal , 50, 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research , 49, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, H.W. (1966). The relevance of rhetoric to philosophy and of philosophy to rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 52, 41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, H.W. (1982). Bilaterality in argument and communication. In J.R. Cox & C.A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentative research , (pp. 95–102). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. P. (1988, November). On the relationship of the descriptive, normative, and pedagogical in argumentativeness research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lasch, C. (1990, September). The lost art of political argument. Harper's , pp. 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. , & Young, T.J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research , 5, 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, B. J. , & Delia, J. G. (1979). Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number of strategic arguments and appeals in a persuasive message. Communication Monographs , 46, 231–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D.J. (1977). Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13, 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmann, R. (1964). In lieu of a new rhetoric. College English , 26, 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Professors, students, and sex . (1990, October). Harper's , pp. 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1968). Reciprocity and credit building in dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 8, 143–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1971). Indirect communication and the search for agreement in negotiation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 1, 205–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior . N. Y.: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. , & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilaterial negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31, 621–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancer, A.S. , Baukus, R.A. , & Amato, P.P. (1986). Argumentativeness, verbal aggression, and marital satisfaction. Communication Research Reports , 3, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind . New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, F. E. , Tutzauer, M. , & Dailey, W. O. (1989). The role of argumentation in distributive and integrative bargaining contexts: Seeking relative advantage but at what cost. In A. Rahim (Ed.). Managing Conflict: An Interdisciplinary Approach New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. W. (1967). Toward a new rhetoric. Pennsylvania Speech Annual , 14, 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. (1991, August). Argumentative strategies for managing conflict. A paper presented at the SCA/ AFA summer conference on argumentation, Alta, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Trapp, R. (1990). Arguments in interpersonal relationships. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.). Perspectives on Argumentation , (pp. 43–54). Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, J.H. , & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication . New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, J.W. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives of argumentation , (pp. 9–26). Prospect Heights, Ill. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, R. L. , & Schenck-Hamlin, W. (1981). A multidimensional scaling validation of an inductively derived set of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Monographs , 48, 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar