The American Democracy Project at Work: Engaging Citizens in Argumentation

References

• Auer, J. J. (1962). The counterfeit debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon , 1960 (pp. 142–150). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , McKinney, M. S. , & Holbert, R. L. (2001). Beyond learning and persona: Extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs , 68, 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , Brazeal, L. M. , McHale, J. P , Klyukovski, A. , & Airne, D. (2001). The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F. , Oldendick, R. W. , & Tuchfarber, A.J. (1980). The presidential debates as a device for increasing the “rationality” of electoral behavior. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadows , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 179–196). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Kerry set dates and formats for debates. (2004, September 21). Omaha World Herald , p. 4A.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B. , & McKinney, M. S. (Eds.). (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B. , Schill, D. , Levasseur, D. G. , & King, A. (2005). The post-9/11 public sphere: Citizen talk about the 2004 presidential debates. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8, 617–638.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. P. (1989). A defense of the “debate” in presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 25, 208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. P. (1992). Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments. Political Communication , 9, 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H. (1978). Presidential debates—Are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs , 45, 330–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Election Commission. (2000). Federal Elections 2000. 2000 Presidential Electoral Popular Vote. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/elecpop.htm
   Google Scholar
• Federal Election Commission. (2004). 2004 Presidential General Election Candidates and Election Results. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2004/2004presgenresults.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, H. , Wolffe, R. , & Lipper, T. (2004, October 11). 90 minutes later, a new race. Newsweek , pp. 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hollihan, T. A. (2001). Uncivil wars: Political campaigns in a media age. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
   Google Scholar
• Hollihan, T. A. , & Riley, P. (1981, May). The 1980 presidential debates: An analysis of argument types, issues, and perceptions of the candidates. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. T. (2005). The role of televised debates in the U.S. presidential election process (1960–2004). New Orleans, LA: University Press of the South.
   Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. , McKinney, M. S. , & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B. (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media , 37, 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. , & Carlin, D. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M. , Bybee, C. R. , & Durall, J. A. (1979). Equivalence of informed participation: The 1976 presidential debates as a source of influence. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook , 2 (pp. 469–493). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. , & MacKuen, M. (1979). Informing the electorate: A national study. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford , 1976 (pp. 269–297). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (2002). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• The Racine Group. (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. , & Chaffee, S. (1978). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford , 1976 (pp. 223–261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. , & Friedenberg, R. (2004). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (5 ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, K. , & Lupfer, M. (1978). The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly , 42, 342–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar