Appealing to the Brooding Spirit of the Law: Good and Evil in Landmark Judicial Dissents

References

• Aune, J. A. (2003). The argument from evil in the rhetoric of reaction. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 6, 518–522.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In I. Berlin , Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, R. F. (2004). Dissent, Posner-style: Judge Richard A. Posner's first decade of dissenting opinions, 1981–1991-Toward an aesthetics of judicial dissenting style. Missouri Law Review , 69, 73–161. Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, W. J., Jr. (1986). In defense of dissents. Hastings Law Journal , 37, 427–438. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. III (1983). The spirit of dissent. Judicature , 66, 304–312.
   Google Scholar
• Darsey, J. (1997). The prophetic tradition and radical rhetoric in America. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, W. O. (1948). The dissent: A safeguard of democracy. Journal of the American Judicature Society , 32, 104–107. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856).
   Google Scholar
• Fried, C. (2002). Five to four: Reflections on the school voucher case. Harvard Law Review , 116, 163–198.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, M. (1962). Justice Scalia's rhetoric of dissent: A Greco-Roman analysis of Scalia's advocacy in the VMI case. Kentucky Law Journal , 91, 167–204.
   Google Scholar
• Fuld, S. H. (1962). The voices of dissent. Columbia Law Review , 62, 923–929.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. (2006). United States v. Virginia: A rhetorical battle between progress and preservation. Women's Studies in Communication , 29, 133–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. E. (1936). The Supreme Court of the United States: Its foundation, methods and achievement. Garden City: Columbia University Press. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Kolsky, M. (1995). Justice William Johnson and the history of Supreme Court dissent. Georgetown Law Journal , 83, 2069–2098. Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnakumar, A. S. (2000). On the evolution of the canonical dissent. Rutgers Law Review , 52, 781–826. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, A.J. (1944). Mr. Justice William Johnson, creative dissenter. Michigan Law Review , 43, 497–548.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. (1991). Law's tragedy. Rhetoric Society Quarterly , 21, 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. K. (1999). Reading Justice Brennan: Is there a “right” to dissent? Hastings Law Journal , 50, 683–704. Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R. D. (1952). Concurring and dissenting opinions. American Bar Association Journal , 38, 821–824. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. A. (1981). Dissents in American courts. The Journal of Politics , 43, 412–434. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, R. (1956). Introduction. In M. Musmanno , Justice Musmanno dissents (pp. v–vi). Indianapolis, IL: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Primus, R. A. (1998). Canon, anti-canon, and judicial dissent. Duke Law Journal , 48, 243–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. K. (1988). Justice Brennan and the jurisprudence of dissent. Temple Law Review , 61, 307–331.
   Google Scholar
• Rountree, C. (2001). Instantiating “the law” and its dissents in Korematsu v. United States: A dramatistic analysis of judicial discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 87, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Russomanno, J. (2006). Dissent yesterday and today: The Tinker case and its legacy. Communication Law & Policy , 11, 367–391.
   Google Scholar
• Scalia, A. (1994). The dissenting opinion Journal of Supreme Court History , 33, 33–63.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, R. B. (1952). The function of concurring and dissenting opinions in courts of last resort. The University of Florida Law Review , 5, 394–410.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, H. F. (1942). Dcalangissenting opinions are not without value. Journal of American Judicature Society , 26, 78.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, P. M. (1995). The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: Judicial writings. University of Chicago Law Review , 62, 1371–1450. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZoBell, K. (1959). Division of opinion in the Supreme Court: A history of judicial Disintegration. Cornell Law Quarterly , 44, 186–214.
   Google Scholar