References
- Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. . New York: Peter Lang.
- Benoit, W. L. , Brazeal, L. M. , & Airne, D. (2007). A functional analysis of televised U.S. Senate and gubernatorial campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 44, 75–89.
- Benoit, W. L. , & Harthcock, A. (1999). Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defense in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341–357.
- Jaffa, H. V. (1982). Crisis of the house divided: An interpretation of the issues in the Lincoln-Douglas debates. . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Jamieson, K. H. (1996). Packaging the presidency: A history and criticism of presidential campaign advertising (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Johnson, A. (1908). Stephen A. Douglas: A study in American politics. . New York: The MacMillan Company.
- Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33, 159–174.
- Northern Illinois University (2008). A. Lincoln. Retried on November 26, 2008 from http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/debates.html.
- Republican National Committee. (2008). The Republican Party-GOP history. Retrieved on November 26, 2008 from http://www.gop.com/.
- Ray, R. F. (1961). Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1848. In R. Reid (Ed.), American public address: Studies in honor of Albert Craig Baird (pp. 245–270). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
- U.S. Senate . (2008). Direct election of senators. Retrieved on November 26, 2008 from http://www.senate.gov/.
- Zarefsky, D. (1990). Lincoln, Douglas, and Slavery in the crucible of public debate. . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.