A Functional Analysis of 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates

References

• Airne, D. , & Benoit, W. L. (2005). Political television advertising in campaign 2000. Communication (Quarterly , 53, 473–492.
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (2007, September). President Bush's approval rating. Retrieved from LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of Presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2000). A functional analysis of political advertising across media, 1998. Communication Studies , 51, 274–295.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2003). Presidential campaign discourse as a causal factor in election outcome. Western Journal of Communication , 67, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2004). Political party affiliation and presidential campaign discourse. Communication Quarterly , 52, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. . New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Blaney, J. R. , & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Hansen, G.J. (2004). Issue ownership in primary and general presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 40, 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Hansen, G. J. , & Stein, K. A. (2004). News coverage of presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 40, 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Hansen, G. J. , & Verser, R. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 70, 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Harthcock, A. (1999). Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 Presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Hemmer, K. (2007). A functional analysis of German chancellor debates, 2002 and 2005. San Francisco, CA: International Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Henson, J. R. (2007). A functional analysis of 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian election debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 44, 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Klyukovski, A. A. (2006). A functional analysis of 2004 Ukrainian presidential debates. Argumentation , 20, 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , McKinney, M. S. , & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Effects of watching campaign 2000 presidential primary debates. Journal of Communication , 52, 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , Brazeal, L. M. , McHale, J. P. , Klyukovksi, A. , & Airne, D. (2002). The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Sheafer, T. (2006). Functional theory and political discourse: Televised debates in Israel and the United States Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly , 83, 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Stein, K. A. , McHale, J. P. , Chattopadhyay, S. , Verser, R. , & Price, S. (2007). Bush versus Kerry: A functional analysis of campaign 2004. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Stephenson, M. T. (2004). Effects of watching a presidential primary debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate , 25, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Wen, W-C. , & Yu, T. (2007). A functional analysis of 2004 Taiwanese political debates. Asian Journal of Communication , 17, 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Berquist, G. F. (1960). The Kennedy-Humphrey debate. Today's Speech , 8(3), 2–3, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S.J. , & Hubbard, C. (2000). The role of televised debates in the presidential nominating process. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House 2000: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 255–284). New York, NY: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, J. , Fine, M. G. , & Davis, L. K. (1983). The 1980 Republican primary debates: The transformation of actor to scene. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 69, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. A. , & Knotts, H. G. (2004). Packaging the governors: Television advertising in the 2000 elections. In D. A. Schultz (Ed.), Lights, camera, campaign! Media, politics, and political advertising (pp. 101–120). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , & Phillips, S. L. (1981). A verbal and visual analysis of the 1980 Houston Republican primary debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal , 47, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis in communication research. . New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman, J. W. (2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist , 49, 229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. (1987). The Dewey-Stassen primary debate of 1948: An examination of format for presidential debates. In J. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 249–253). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, H. (2008, April 18). Performance by ABC's moderators is a matter of debate. Washington Post , p. C1.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R. , & Pomper, G. M. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. senate elections. . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. , & Benoit, W. L. (2005). A functional analysis of the 2002 Korean presidential debates. Asian Journal of Communication , 15, 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B. , Elliot, W. R. , Bernstein, J. M. , Rosenberg, W. L. , & Nestvold, K.J. (1991). News verdicts, the debates, and presidential campaigns. . New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Memmott, M. , & Carnia, C. (2007, November 28). GOP presidential candidates to go another round. USA Today , p. 5A
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. (1984). Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising , 13, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2008, April 14). Democrat debates: One year later it's Clinton vs. Obama. USA Today , p. 6A.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science , 40, 825–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. , Benoit, W. L. , & Hansen, G. L. (2003–2004). Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly , 118, 599–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1984). A comparative assessment of intra-party political debate formats. Political Communication Review , 8, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1987). The influence of intraparty debates on candidate preference. Communication Research , 14, 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debates and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research , 16, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R. F. (1961). Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1948. In R. Reid (Ed.), American public address: Studies in honor of Albert Craig Baird (pp. 245–270). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C. , & Maurer, M. (2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and postdebate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication , 55, 775–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelzner, H. G. (1971). Humphrey and Kennedy court West Virginia, May 3, 1960. Southern Speech Journal , 37, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C.J. (1975). Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal , 26, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, V. , Golden, J. L. , & James, H. (1988). Perceptions of the 1984 presidential debates and a select 1988 presidential primary debate. Presidential Studies Quarterly , 18, 541–563.
   Google Scholar
• Yawn, M. , Ellsworth, K. , Beatty, B. , & Kahn, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior , 20, 155–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar