A Functional Analysis of 2008 General Election Debates

References

• Banwart, M. C. , & McKinney, M. S. (2005). A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies , 56, 353–373.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of Presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2003). Presidential campaign discourse as a causal factor in election outcome. Western Journal of Communication , 67, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2004). Political party affiliation and presidential campaign discourse. Communication Quarterly , 52, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. . New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Blaney, J. R. , & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Glantz, M. (2012). A functional analysis of 2008 general election presidential TV spots. Speaker & Gavel , 49, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Harthcock, A. (1999). Function of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , McHale, J. P , Hansen, G. J. , Pier, P. M. , & McGuire, J. P. (2003). Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of presidential campaign discourse. . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Stein, K. A. , McHale, J. P. , Chattopadhyay, S. , Verser, R. , Price, S. (2007). Bush versus Kerry: A functional analysis of campaign 2004. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Wells, W. T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. . Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F. , Meadow, R. G. , & Jackson-Beeck, M. (Eds.). (1978). The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives. . New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. , & Rueter, T. (1980). Carter vs Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976 . Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. P. , & McKinney, M. S. (Eds.). (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Responsive Politics. (2009). Banking on becoming president. Accessed 1/6/09: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2000). Televised election debates: International perspectives. . New York: St. Martin's.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, W. O. , Hinck, E. A. , & Hinck, S. S. (2007). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debates from 1960 to 2004. . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.). (1994). Rhetorical studies of national political debates, 1960–1992 (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. . New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, E. A. (1993). Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis in communication research. . New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of mating an informed electorate. . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1962). The great debates. . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1977). The great debates: Carter versus Ford, 1976. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (2000). Televised presidential debates and public policy (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoue, D. J. , & Schrott, P. R. (1991). The joint press conference: The history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur, D. , & Dean, K. W. (1996). The use of evidence in presidential debates: A study of evidence levels and types from 1960–1988. Argumentation and Advocacy , 32, 129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Louden, A. (2013). Political debates: Selected bibliography. Accessed 6/1/13: http://www.wfu.edu/%7Elouden/Political%20Communication/Bibs/DEBATES.html.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. (1984). Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising , 13, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York Times. (2008, December 1). Election 2008. Accessed 1/6/09: http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/advertising/advertisers/2-barack-obama; http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/advertising/advertisers/8-john-mccain
   Google Scholar
• Racine Group. (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C. , & Maurer, M. (2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and post-debate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication , 55, 775–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhea, D. M. (2012). There they go again: The use of humor in presidential debates 1960–2008. Argumentation and Advocacy , 49, 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential debates: Forty years of high-risk TV. . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stelter, B. (2008, October 17). Popular, and over at last. New York Times , p. A20.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. J. (1975). Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal , 26, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Swerdlow, J. L. (1984). Beyond debate: A paper on televised presidential debates. . New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Swerdlow, J. L. (Ed.). (1987). Presidential debates 1988 and beyond . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
   Google Scholar