Scientific argument without a scientific consensus: Rachel Carson's rhetorical strategies in the Silent Spring debates

References

• Beasley, Maurine. 1988. “The Women's National Press Club: Case Study of Professional Aspirations.” Journalism History 15(4): 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, Jane E. 2015. “Not Vaccinating Children is the Greater Risk.” The New York Times, August 10. Accessed 31 July 2017. https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/08/10/not-vaccinating-children-is-the-greater-risk/?mcubz=2
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, Leah. 2011. “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14(2): 195–228.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, Tara Lynee. 2009. “Social Identity as Grammar and Rhetoric of Motives: Citizen Housewives and Rachel Carson's Silent Spring.” KB Journal 5(2): 11–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, Doug. 2016. “Communicating Climate Change to Religious Conservative Audiences: The Case of Katharine Hayhoe and Andrew Farley.” Reflections: Public Rhetoric, Civic Writing, and Service Learning 16(1): 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarco, Patricia M. 2017. “Rachel Carson's Environmental Ethic –A Guide for Global Systems Decision Making.” Journal of Cleaner Production 140(1): 127–133. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, Danielle. 2009. “Science and Public Participation: An Analysis of Public Scientific Argument in the Yucca Mountain Controversy.” Environmental Communication 3(1): 49–75. doi:10.1080/17524030802704369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glotfelty, Cheryll. 2000. “Cold War, Silent Spring, The Trope of War in Modern Environmen-talism.” In And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, edited by Craig Waddell, 157–173. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. Thomas. 1991. “Controversy.” In Proceedings of the 67th SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, edited by Donn Parson, 1–13. Annandale, VA: SCA.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. Thomas. 2012. “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry Into the Art of Public Deliberation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 48(4): 198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh, Michel M., and Ann Marie Major. 2016. “Rachel Carson's War of Words Against Government and Industry: Challenging the Objectivity of American Scientific Discourse.” In Green Voices: Defending Nature and the Environment in American Civic Discourse, edited by Richard D. Besel and Bernard K. Duffy, 153–173.State University of New York Press: Albany, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, Donald T. 1993. “Lessons from Federal Pesticide Regulation on the Paradigms and Politics of Environmental Law Reform.” Yale Journal on Regulation 10: 369–446.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, Robert. 2012. “The Book that Changed the World: 50 Years After Silent Spring, Rachel Carson Still has Something to Teach Us.” The Environmental Magazine 23(5): 20.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M., Ellen Peters, Erica Cantrell Dawson, and Paul Slovic. 2013. “Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government.” The Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 116. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M. 2013. “Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection.” Judgment and Decision Making 8(4): 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M. 2015. “Climate–Science Communication and the Measurement Problem.” Advances in Political Psychology 36(1): 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, M. Jimmie, and Jacqueline S. Palmer. 1992. Ecospeak: Rhetoric and Environmental Politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, Linda. 1997. Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature. New York: Henry Hold and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, Linda. 1998. Lost Woods: The Discovered Writings of Rachel Carson. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, Peter C. 2008. “Rachel Carson and George J. Wallace: Why Public Environmental Scientists Should be Advocates for Nature.” In Rachel Carson: Legacy and Challenge, edited by Lisa H. Sideris and Kathleen Dean Moore, 41–57. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, Alex. 2012. “The Affective Legacy of Silent Spring.” Environmental Humanities 1: 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, John. 2013. “The Rachel Carson Letters and the Making of Silent Spring." Sage Open 3(3): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lubchenco, Jane. 2008. “Rachel Carson's Scientific and Ocean Legacies.” In Rachel Carson: Legacy and Challenge, edited by Lisa H. Sideris and Kathleen Dean Moore, 29–40. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luna, Jenny. 2016. “California Adds Atrazine to List of Toxic Chemicals, But No Ban.” KQED Science, July 28. Accessed 2 August 2017. https://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/07/28/california-adds-atrazine-to-list-of-toxic-chemicals-but-no-ban/
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, Steve, and Cynthia Hardy. 2009. “Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: The Decline of DDT.” Academy of Management Journal 52(1): 148–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, Jay L., and Eric Sevareid, dir. 1963. The Silent Spring of Rachel Carson. CBS Reports. VHS.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Kathryn M., and G. Thomas Goodnight. 1994. “Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy, and Fashion: The Social Controversy Over Fur.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80(3): 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paroske, Marcus. 2009. “Deliberating International Science Policy Controversies: Uncertainty and AIDS in South Africa.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 80(2): 148–170. doi:10.1080/00335630902842053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideris, Lisa H. 2008. “Fact and Fiction, Fear and Wonder: The Legacy of Rachel Carson.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 91(3/4): 335–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Michael. 2008. “‘Silence, Miss Carson!’: Science, Gender, and the Reception of Silent Spring.” In Rachel Carson: Legacy and Challenge, edited by Lisa H. Sideris and Kathleen Dean Moore, 168–187. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steingraber, Sandra. 2003. Having Faith: An Ecologist's Journey to Motherhood. New York: The Berkeley Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Steingraber, Sandra. 2010. Living Downstream: An Ecologist's Personal Investigation of Cancer and the Environment. Philadelphia: De Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, Craig. 2000. “The Reception of Silent Spring.” In And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, edited by Craig Waddell, 1–16. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Kenny, and Lynda Walsh. 2012. “‘No One Yet Knows What the Ultimate Consequences May Be’: How Rachel Carson Transformed Scientific Uncertainty Into a Site for Public Participation in Silent Spring.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26(1): 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Lynda. 2013. Scientists as Prophets: A Rhetorical Genealogy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar