References
- Berne, E. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Grove Press.
- Constantino, M. J., Morrison, N. R., MacEwan, G., & Boswell, J. F. (2013). Therapeutic alliance researchers’ perspectives on alliance-centered training practices. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration,23, 284–289. doi:10.1037/a0032357
- Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,63, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
- Hilgard, E. R. (1991). A neodissociation interpretation of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Hope, A. E., & Sugarman, L. I. (2015). Orienting hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,57, 212–229. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.976787
- Kirsch, I. E. (1999). How expectations shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Lambert, M. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94–129). New York, NY: Wiley.
- Lankton, S. (1985). A states of consciousness model of Ericksonian hypnosis. In S. R. Lankton (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach (pp. 26–14). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.
- Lankton, S., & Lankton, C. (1983). The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Publishers.
- Lynn, S., Laurence, J., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,57, 314–329. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
- Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report instrument: A replication. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,30, 57–65. doi:10.1080/00029157.1987.10402723
- Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1989). Patterns of consciousness during hypnosis: Relevance to cognition and individual differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,17, 1–20.
- Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2000). Operationalizing “trance” I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,43, 107–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
- Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010a). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,52, 271–286.
- Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010b). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,52, 287–314.
- Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Tart, C. T. (1972). Altered states of consciousness. New York, NY: Wiley.
- Tart, C. T. (1975). States of consciousness. New York, NY: Dutton.
- Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Wickramasekera II, I. (2015). Mysteries of hypnosis and the self are revealed by the psychology and neuroscience of empathy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,57, 330–348. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.978495