References
- Braid, J. (1853). The rationale of nervous sleep considered in relation with animal magnetism. London, UK: Churchill.
- Elkins, G. R., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,63, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
- Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Gauld, A. (1995). A history of hypnotism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Barrett, D., & Montgomery, G. H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,53, 259–264. doi:10.1080/00207140590961321
- Hilgard, E. R. (1973). The domain of hypnosis: With some comments on alternative paradigms. American Psychologist,28, 972–982. doi:10.1037/h0035452
- Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility: An experimental approach. New York, NY: Appleton.
- Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 21–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Killeen, P. R., & Nash, M. R. (2003). The four causes of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,51, 195–231. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.3.195.15522
- McConkey, K. M. (2005). On finding the balanced path of hypnosis definition. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis,48, 137–139. doi:10.1080/00029157.2005.10401509
- McConkey, K. M. (2008). Generations and landscape of hypnosis: Questions we’ve asked, questions we should ask. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 53–77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- McConkey, K. M., & Perry, C. (2002). Benjamin Franklin and mesmerism revisited. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,50, 320–331. doi:10.1080/00207140208410108
- Nash, M. R. (2005). The importance of being earnest when crafting definitions: Science and scientism are not the same thing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,53, 265–280. doi:10.1080/00207140590961934
- Nash, M. R., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Introduction: A roadmap for explanation, a working definition. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2014). Defining hypnosis: Process, product, and the value of tolerating ambiguity [Commentary on Wagstaff’s “On the centrality of the concept of an altered state to definitions of hypnosis”]. Journal of Mind-Body Regulation,2, 118–120.
- Sheehan, P. W., & Perry, C. W. (1976). Methodologies of hypnosis: A critical appraisal of contemporary paradigms of hypnosis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wagstaff, G. E. (2014). On the centrality of the concept of an altered state to definitions of hypnosis. Journal of Mind-Body Regulation,2, 90–108.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations ( G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Woody, E. Z., & McConkey, K. M. (2003). What we don’t know about the brain and hypnosis, but need to: A view from the Buckhorn Inn. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis,51, 309–338. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.3.309.15523