The “Mysteries of Hypnosis:” Helping Us Better Understand Hypnosis and Empathic Involvement Theory (EIT)

References

• Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Barabasz, A. F., & Barabasz, M. (2008). Hypnosis and the brain. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 337–363). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budzynski, R. H., Budzynski, H. K., Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback: Advanced theory and applications. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (Eds.). (2014). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Pekala, R. J. (2014). Researching states of consciousness and anomalous experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed., pp. 57–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D. (2007). The hard problem of consciousness. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 225–235). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Churches, R. M. (2015). The followership effect: Charismatic oratory, hypnoidal and altered states of consciousness ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Collura, T. (2008). Towards a coherent view of brain connectivity. Journal of Neurotherapy, 12, 99–110. doi:10.1080/10874200802433274
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, R. J., & Pekala, R. J. (1996). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: A partial replication. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 24, 92–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, R. V. (2007). Functionalism and qualia. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 381–395). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. (1980). Consciousness in contemporary psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 1–28. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, M., Valli, K., & Revonsuo, A. (2011). How to assess ictal consciousness? Behavioural. Neurology, 24, 11–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 226–258). New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Krippner, S. (2005). Trance and the trickster: Hypnosis as a liminal phenomenon. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 97–118. doi:10.1080/00207140590927608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukla, A. (1983). Toward a science of experience. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, M., & Raz, A. (2015). Hypnosis and imaging of the living human brain. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 285–313. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.978496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2007). Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness: An introduction. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 499–661). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, A., & Thompson, E. (2003). Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A. (2008). Hypnosis, trance and suggestion: Evidence from neuroimaging. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 365–392). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1982). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute)
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1985). The Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts. (Now published by Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute)
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991a). Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 8, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991b). Quantifying consciousness: An empirical approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991c). The Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire. West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991d). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1995a). A short, unobtrusive hypnotic-assessment procedure for assessing hypnotizability level: I. Development and research. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 271–283. doi:10.1080/00029157.1995.10403156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1995b). A short unobtrusive hypnotic induction for assessing hypnotizability: II. Clinical case reports. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 284–293. doi:10.1080/00029157.1995.10403157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2009, October). Therapist’s manual: Interpretation of the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory: Hypnotic Assessment Procedure (PCI-HAP. ( Unpublished manual).
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2010). Reply to “Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory–Hypnotic Assessment Procedure: A comment on Pekala et al. (2010a, 2010b). American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53, 119–132. doi:10.1080/00029157.2010.10404334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2011). Reply to Wagstaff: “Hypnosis and the relationship between trance, suggestion, expectancy, and depth: Some semantic and conceptual issues.” American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 53, 207–227. doi:10.1080/00029157.2011.10401758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2014, May). Phenomenological snapshots of the hypnotic mind: An overview. Invited address given to the Greater Philadelphia Society of Clinical Hypnosis, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (2015). Hypnosis as a “state of consciousness:” How quantifying the mind can help us better understand hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 402–424. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Ersek, B. (1992/1993). Fire walking versus hypnosis: A preliminary study concerning consciousness, attention, and fire immunity. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 12, 207–229. doi:10.2190/J703-N7H8-KMGL-0DLG
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. (1988). Hypnoidal effects associated with several stress management strategies. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, 121 132.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1990). Subjective effects of several stress management strategies: With reference to attention. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 39–43. doi:10.1080/08964289.1990.9934590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Forbes, E. J. (1997). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: Towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 39, 212–224. doi:10.1080/00029157.1997.10403386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1984). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility by a self-report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 114–121. doi:10.1080/00029157.1984.10402867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report instrument: A replication. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 57–65. doi:10.1080/00029157.1987.10402723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2000). Operationalizing “Trance” I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43, 107–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2005). States, traits, and provocative debates: The state/nonstate controversy with particular reference to operationalizing “hypnotism.” Psychological Hypnosis, 14, 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2007). An empirical-phenomenological approach to quantifying consciousness and states of consciousness: With particular reference to understanding the nature of hypnosis. In G. Jamieson (Ed.), Towards a cognitive-neuroscience of hypnosis and conscious states: A resource for researchers, students, and clinicians (pp. 167–194). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Marcano, G. (1995). Hypnotic types: A partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 12, 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., & Maurer, R. (2009a, October). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory: Hypnotic Assessment Procedure (PCI-HAP): Administrator’s manual. ( Unpublished manual).
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010a). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010b). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Maurer, R., & Ott, U. A. (2009b). Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory—Hypnotic Assessment Protocol—EXCEL Scoring Program. (Unpublished computerized test scoring program).
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231–236. doi:10.1080/00029157.1989.10402777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J., & Kumar, V. K. (1986). Measurement of phenomenological experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983–989. doi:10.2466/pms.1986.63.2.983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Wenger, C. F. (1983). Retrospective phenomenological assessment: Mapping consciousness in reference to specific stimulus conditions. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama, S., Ballentine, R., & Hymes, A. (1979). Science of breath: A practical guide. Honesdale, PA: Himalayan International Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, A. J., & Beischel, J. (2008). Quantitative analysis of mediums’ conscious experiences during a discarnate reading versus a control task: A pilot study. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 8, 157–179.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel, J. R., & Bachelor, A. (2000/01). Altered state and phenomenology of consciousness in schizophrenia. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(2), 141–159. doi:10.2190/QUTK-Q833-69XH-FG4Q
   Google Scholar
• Saraswati, S. S. (1996). Asana pranayama mudra bandha. Bihar, India: Yoga Publications Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W. (1992). The phenomenology of hypnosis and the experiential analysis technique. In E. Fromm& & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 364–389). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. L., & Kolligian, Jr, J. (1987). Personality: Developments in the study of private experience. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 533–574. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.002533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, S., Raju, T. R., Shivani, Y., Tompkins, G., & Meti, B. L. (1997). A study of structure of phenomenology of consciousness in meditative and non-meditative states. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 41(2), 149–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wangyal, T. (2005). The six realms of the wheel of existence ( Unpublished transcript of a 3-week retreat conducted at the Ligmincha Institute). Charlottesville, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2001). Could empathy be a predictor of hypnotic ability: The empathic involvement hypothesis ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Illinois School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2004, March). How research in hypnosis illuminates the Tibetan Buddhist philosophy of mind. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society of Clinical Hypnosis, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2007, August). How research in hypnosis illuminates the Bön-Buddhist model of self. Paper presented the 2007 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2010). Pedagogical perspectives on teaching hypnosis. In D. Barrett (Ed.), Hypnosis and hypnotherapy (pp. 145–160). Boston, MA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2015). Mysteries of hypnosis and the self are revealed by the psychology and neuroscience of empathy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 330–348. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.978495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E., & Szlyk, J. (2003). Could empathy be a predictor of hypnotic ability? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(4), 390–399. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.4.390.16413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman, W. J. (2011). Religious and spiritual experiences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildman, W. J., & McNamara, P. (2010). Evaluating reliance on narratives in the psychological study of religious experiences. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 223–254. doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.507666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M., & Thompson, E. (2007). Consciousness: An introduction. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 1–3). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar