268
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

The M in STEM: Using Mathematics Methods Courses to Support Preservice P-5 Teachers’ Understanding and Use of STEM Integration Practices

ORCID Icon
Pages 98-111 | Received 12 Aug 2020, Accepted 16 Mar 2021, Published online: 06 May 2022

References

  • Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Disparidades de Financiamento e a Desigual Distribuição de Professores: Avaliando Fontes e Soluções, 20(37), 1–42.
  • Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. B. (2013). The Impact of Identity in K-8 Mathematics: Rethinking Equity-Based Practices. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Appova, A. K. (2018). Opportunities in mathematics content courses for developing prospective teachers’ knowledge about students. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 9(2), 15.
  • Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
  • Baker, C. K., & Galanti, T. M. (2017). Integrating STEM in elementary classrooms using model-eliciting activities: Responsive professional development for mathematics coaches and teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0066-3
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
  • Bessant, K. C. (1995). Factors associated with types of mathematics anxiety in college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/749478
  • Blanco, T. G., & Chamberlin, S. A. (2019). Pre-service teacher statistical misconceptions during teacher preparation program. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1-3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1469
  • Bowers, S. W., & Ernst, J. V. (2018). Assessing elementary in-service teachers’ STEM-centric lesson plans. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 19(2), 5.
  • Boyd, P., & Ash, A. (2018). Mastery mathematics: Changing teacher beliefs around in-class grouping and mindset. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.016
  • Brandenburg, R., & Sharp, L. (2020). “If you were the teacher, what would you do next?” Reflective inquiry in primary mathematics teaching. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 25(3), 6.
  • Bright, A. (2016). Education for whom? Taboo: The Journal of Culture & Education, 15(1), 6–22.
  • Brown, R. E., & Bogiages, C. A. (2019). Professional development through stem integration: How early career math and science teachers respond to experiencing integrated stem tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9863-x
  • Brown, P., & Keep, E. (2018). Rethinking the race between education & technology: Experts differ widely in their predictions about how technological innovation will change the labor market, but they all see a need for changes in education. Issues in Science & Technology, 35(1), 31–39.
  • Bybee, R. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
  • Cargnelutti, E., Tomasetto, C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2017). How is anxiety related to math performance in young students? A longitudinal study of Grade 2 to Grade 3 children. Cognition & Emotion, 31(4), 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1147421
  • Carroll, M. A., & Barnes, E. F. (2015). Strategies for enhancing diverse mentoring relationships in stem fields. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 13(1), 58–69.
  • Chang, H., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). The math anxiety-math performance link and its relation to individual and environmental factors: A review of current behavioral and psychophysiological research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.011
  • Chapman, S., & Mitchell, M. (2018). Mindset for math: Coaching cycle empowers students and teachers. Learning Professional, 39(5), 60–64.
  • Clark, A., DeLuca, B., Ernst, J., Kelly, D., & Ridgeway, J. (2017). Designing standards-based STEM. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 77(4), 30–35.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part I. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549072
  • Collins, K. H. (2018). Confronting color-blind stem talent development: Toward a contextual model for black student stem identity. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18757958
  • Collins, K. H., & Jones Roberson, J. (2020). Developing stem identity and talent in underrepresented students: Lessons learned from four gifted black males in a magnet school program. Gifted Child Today, 43(4), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520940767
  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium InTASC model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0: a resource for ongoing teacher development. Author.
  • Cruz, J. M., Wilson, A. T., & Wang, X. (2019). Connections between pre-service teachers’ mathematical dispositions and self-efficacy for teaching mathematics. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 400–420.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
  • Davis, J. (2018). Redefining Black students’ success and high achievement in mathematics education: Toward a liberatory paradigm. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 11, 69–77.
  • Davis, J., Goings, R., & Allen, K. (2019). Developing pre-service mathematics teachers to meet the needs of Black male students in teacher education programs. In G. Prime (Ed.), Centering race in the STEM education of African American K-12 learners. Peter Lang.
  • Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1998). The mathematical experience. Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1981).
  • Driver, M. K., & Powell, S. R. (2017). Culturally and linguistically responsive schema intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716646730
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 103(6), 1013–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141
  • Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533800
  • Froschauer, L. (2016). Bringing STEM to the elementary classroom., NSTA Press.
  • Ganley, C. M., & McGraw, A. L. (2016). The development and validation of a revised version of the math anxiety scale for young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181
  • Giamellaro, M., & Siegel, D. R. (2018). Coaching teachers to implement innovations in STEM. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.002
  • Gibbons, L., Feldman, Z., Chapin, S., Batista, L. N., Starks, R., & Vazquez-Aguilar, M. (2018). Facilitation practices in mathematics teacher education and the mathematical identities of preservice elementary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 20(3), 20.
  • Gonzalez, K., & Maxwell, G. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ efficacy, experience, certification and their impact on student achievement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 21, 1–11.
  • Greathouse, P., Eisenbach, B. B., & Kaywell, J. F. (2019). Preparing teacher candidates to be “effective” in the classroom: Lessons learned from national teachers of the year. Clearing House, 92(1-2), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1561405
  • Gresham, G. (2018). Preservice to inservice: Does mathematics anxiety change with teaching experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702580
  • Gresham, G., & Burleigh, C. (2019). Exploring early childhood preservice teachers’ mathematics anxiety and mathematics efficacy beliefs. Teaching Education, 30(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1466875
  • Grossman, P. L., Hammerness, K. M., & McDonald, M. A. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
  • Harmon, H. L., & Wilborn, S. C. (2016). The math learning gap: Preparing stem technicians for the new rural economy. Rural Educator, 37(3), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v37i3.257
  • Hart, L. C., Oesterle, S., & Swars, S. L. (2013). The juxtaposition of instructor and student perspectives on mathematics courses for elementary teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9464-0
  • Hughes, P., Swars Auslander, S., Stinson, D. W., & Fortner, C. K. (2019). Elementary teachers’ mathematical beliefs and mathematics anxiety: How do they shape instructional practices? School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12329
  • Karunakaran, M. S. (2020). Opportunities to decrease elementary prospective teachers’ mathematics anxiety. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2-3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1495
  • King, D., Lyons, T., Dawes, L., Doyle, T., & O’Loughlin, M. (2018). STEM resources on demand (STEMROD): Working with community/industry partners and pre-service teachers to develop ‘ready to use’ resources for teachers. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 64(2), 31–37.
  • Larkin, K., & Jorgensen, R. (2016). “I hate maths: Why do we need to do maths?” Using ipad video diaries to investigate attitudes and emotions towards mathematics in year 3 and year 6 students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9621-x
  • Larnell, G. V., Bullock, E. C., & Jett, C. C. (2016). Rethinking teaching and learning mathematics for social justice from a critical race perspective. Journal of Education, 196(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600104
  • Love, T. S. (2018). The t&e in STEM: A collaborative effort. Science Teacher, 86(3), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_086_03_8
  • Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ future-oriented mathematical identity work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9500-8
  • Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2018). Future directions in research on mathematics-related teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9796-4
  • National Science and Technology Council. (2016). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) education 5-year strategic plan. Executive Office of the President of the United States.
  • NCTM. (2014). Access and equity in mathematics education. A position of the national council of teachers of mathematics. Retreieved August 25 2017 from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Access-and-Equity-in-Mathematics-Education/.
  • Newmann, F., Carmichael, D., & King, M. B. (2016). Authentic intellectual work: Improving teaching for rigorous learning. Corwin Press.
  • Phillips, C. (2014). The new math and midcentury American politics. Journal of American History, 101(2), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jau371
  • Preston, C. (2020). Engineering science teacher creativity! Stem in action with preservice teachers. Science & Children, 57(5), 69.
  • Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
  • Reynolds, N. G., & Conaway, B. J. (2003). Factors affecting mathematically talented females’ enrollment in high school calculus. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-435
  • Rooney, D., & Boud, D. (2019). Toward a pedagogy for professional noticing: Learning through observation. Vocations and Learning, 12(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09222-3
  • Sandoval, C., Jr, van Es, E. A., Campbell, S. L., & Santagata, R. (2020). Creating coherence: In teacher preparation examining teacher candidates’ conceptualizations and practices for equity. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(4), 8–32.
  • Santagata, R., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2019). Preservice teachers’ mathematics teaching competence: Comparing performance on two measures. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117753575
  • Sharp, L. A., Goode, F., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2020). The preparation of novice special education teachers for instructional planning and strategies: Viewpoints among teacher educators and preservice teachers. Excellence in Education Journal, 9(2), 5–28.
  • Steiner, A., Lemke, J., Nero, D., & McGlamery, S. (2019). Stem and community engagement: Providing preservice teachers authentic experiences beyond the classroom. Science & Children, 56(8), 76–79.
  • Stoehr, K. J. (2017). Mathematics anxiety: One size does not fit all. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676316
  • Stohlmann, M. (2018). A vision for future work to focus on the. "M" in Integrated STEM. School Science & Mathematics, 118(7), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12301
  • Suárez-Pellicioni, M., Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Colomé, À. (2016). Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0370-7
  • Swagerty, L. M., & Hodge, T. (2019). Fostering creativity and curiosity: Developing safer elementary stem learning spaces. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 78(8), 20–23.
  • Thomas, J., & Kavanaugh, T. (2018). Project connect: Creating a STEM community partnership. Children’s Technology & Engineering, 22(3), 7–11.
  • Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037
  • Turner, E. E., & Drake, C. (2016). A review of research on prospective teachers’ learning about children’s mathematical thinking and cultural funds of knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115597476
  • Waddell, L. (2014). Using culturally ambitious teaching practices to support urban mathematics teaching and learning. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 8(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.9741/2161-2978.1069
  • Yu, R., & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1204260
  • Zell, S. (2019). Review of stem teaching models: A call for promoting interdisciplinary approaches in regular mathematics lessons. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 38(4), 361–373.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.