Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Experience with Productive Struggle

References

• Amidon, J., Monroe, A., Rock, D., & Cook, C. (2020). Shame, shame, go away: Fostering productive struggle with mathematics. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 56(2), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2020.1729636
   Google Scholar
• Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE). (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. https://amte.net/sites/default/files/SPTM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach and connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, A. T., Gerstenschlager, N. E., Strayer, J. F., Lischka, A. E., Stephens, D. C., Hartland, K. S., & Willingham, J. C. (2018). Scaffolding for access to productive struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(4), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.23.4.0202
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Humphreys, C. (2005). Connecting mathematical ideas: Middle school video cases to support teaching and learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory consideration in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (2008). Disequilibrium & questioning in the primary classroom: Establishing routines that help students learn. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(3), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.15.3.0134
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education. (pp. 243–307). Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement [microform]/David K. Cohen and Deborah Loewenberg Ball. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education ; U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Digital, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. R., & Beattie, R. L. (2016). Promoting student learning and productive persistence in developmental mathematics: Research frameworks informing the carnegie pathways. NADE Digest, 9(1), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, C. (2016). Discovering and addressing errors during mathematics problem-solving—A productive struggle? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S. (2004). Taking up opportunities to learn: Examining the construction of participatory mathematical identities in middle school classrooms. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questioning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.10.9.0484
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030002393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004012
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (2003). Developing understanding through problem solving. In H. L. Schoen & R.I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades. (pp. 6–12) NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, J. (1982). How students fail. (revised edition). Delta/Seymour Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children’s understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 97–116). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jairam, A. E. (2020). Attending to uncertainty in the design and implementation of DGE tasks to engage mathematics students in productive struggle.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y., & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9144-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal, O., Popovic, G., Morrissey, S., & Holifield, L. (2017). Students’ productive struggle through mathematical modeling. Illinois Mathematics Teacher, 64(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems with teaching. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livy, S., Muir, T., & Sullivan, P. (2018). Challenging tasks lead to productive struggle!. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 23(1), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. D., Hunt, J. H., & Lewis, K. E. (2018). Productive struggle for all: Differentiated instruction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(4), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.23.4.0194
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (Eds.). (1992). Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. Hodder.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Michell, M., & Sharpe, T. (2005). Collective instructional scaffolding in English as a second language classrooms. Prospect, 20(1), 31–58.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denizin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murawska, J. M. (2018). Seven billion people: Fostering productive struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(4), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.23.4.0208
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Permatasari, D. (2016). The role of productive struggle to enhance learning mathematics with understanding. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, J. A. (2019). Making the struggle productive: Conceptualizing the role and impact of the mathematics teacher in episodes of productive struggle.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of ‘‘well-taught’’ mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense- making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). Reflection on doing and teaching mathematics. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 53–69). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S. (2000). Redefining success in mathematics teaching and learning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(6), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.6.0378
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361960020103
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, C., Slavit, D., & McDuffie, A. R. (2018). Supporting all learners in productive struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.23.4.0216
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, K. D., & Bolyard, J. (2018). Creating a classroom culture that supports productive struggle: Pre-service teachers’ reflections on teaching mathematics. Online Submission.
   Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K., Burkhardt, H., Cheema, S., Kang, S., Pead, D., Schoenfeld, A., & Wetzel, J. (2019). Can an orchestration system increase collaborative, productive struggle in teaching-by-eliciting classrooms? Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. K. (2015a). Strategies to support productive struggle. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(7), 390–393. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.20.7.0390
   Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. K. (2015b). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(4), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. K., Starkey, C., Herrera, C. A., & Smith, S. (2019). Developing prospective teachers’ noticing and notions of productive struggle with video analysis in a mathematics content course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2004). What is high quality instruction. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeybek, Z. (2016). Productive struggle in a geometry class. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.86961
   Google Scholar