Governmentality and My School: School Principals in Societies of Control

References

• Anderson, G., & Grinberg, J. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary practice: Appropriating Foucault’s view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 329–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. (2011). New look at leaders or a new look at leadership? International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• English, F. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and civilization. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970). Theatrum philosophicum. Critique, no., 282, 885–908.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Birth of the clinic. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991a). Governmentality. In G. Burchill, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991b). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991c). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002a). Omnes et singulatem: Toward a critique of political reason. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 volume 3: Power. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002b). Interview with Michel Foucault. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, volume 3: Power. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, D. (2008). Developing governmentality: Conduct and education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2005). Current contexts for research in educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33, 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, I., & Boyle, C. (2011). My school? Critiquing the abstraction and quantification of education. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C. (2010). Making hollow men. Educational Theory, 60, 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Williamson, K. (1979). The birth of the schoolroom. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 58–110.
   Google Scholar
• Krejsler, J. (2004). Becoming individual in education and cyberspace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 10, 489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, R. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51, 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadmore, D., Limerick, B., Thomas, P., & Lucas, H. (1995). Devolving practices: Managing the managers. Journal of Education Policy, 10, 399–411.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D. (2011). Leadership and organisational performance: From research to prescription? International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. (2010). Discipline through documentation: Grant applications as a form of governmentality for school principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13, 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niesche, R. (2013). Deconstructing educational leadership: Derrida and Lyotard. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, C. (1989). Foucault: Historian or philosopher?. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L., & McWilliam, E. (2007). Accountability, responsibility and school leadership. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 7, 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., Besley, T., & Olssen, M. (Eds.). (2009). Governmentality studies in education.Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.9
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, R. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2006). The learning society and governmentality: An introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 417–430.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a technology of governmentality. Journal of Educational Policy, 25, 567–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1986). The politics of Michel Foucault. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. (2010). The inappropriate use of NAPLAN data. Professional Voice, Australian Education Union, 8(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar