1,167
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Short Cuts and Extended Techniques: Rethinking relations between technology and educational theory

, &

References

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (1928). Program for a proletarian children’s theater (S. Buck-Morss, trans.). Performance 1 (March/April 1973), pp. 28–32.
  • Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
  • Boal, A. (1992). Games for actors and non-actors. London: Routledge.
  • Bogost, I. (2011). How to do things with videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Buck-Morss, S. (2002). The dialectics of seeing: Walter Benjamin and the arcades project. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • de Castell, S. (2011). Ludic Epistemology: What game-based learning can teach curriculum studies. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 8, 19–27.
  • de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2003). Serious play: Curriculum for a post-talk era. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 1, 47–52.
  • de Castell, S., & Jenson, J. (2007). Digital games for education: When meanings play. Intermedialities, 9, 113–132.10.7202/1005533ar
  • de Castell, S., Bryson, M. & Jenson, J. (2002, January 1). Object lessons: Towards an educational theory of technology, First Monday, 7:1. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/923/845
  • de Castell, S., Jenson, J., & Thumlert, K. (in press). From simulation to imitation: Controllers, corporeality and mimetic play. Simulation and Gaming
  • Cazden, C. (1981). Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 3, 5–8.
  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting Class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dangwal, R., & Kapur, P. (2008). Children’s learning processes using unsupervised ‘hole in the wall’ computers in shared public spaces. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 339–354.
  • Dourish, P. (2001, August 3). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Retrieved from http://www.dourish.com/embodied/essay
  • Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, and pedagogy. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Reclaiming and renewing actor network theory for educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(sup1), 1–14.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00667.x
  • Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of theppressed (30th annual ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Galloway, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gebauer, G., & Wulf, C. (1995). Mimesis: Culture—art—society. Berkeley: Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
  • Gee, J. P. (2007). Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday & Archer Books.
  • Heathcote, D. (1985). A drama of learning: Mantle of the expert. Theory into Practice: Educating through Drama, 24, 173–180.10.1080/00405848509543169
  • Kenway, J. (1996). The information superhighway and post-modernity: The social promise and the social price. Comparative Education, 32, 2.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Hassard, & J. Law (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review.
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
  • McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 323–348.
  • McLuhan, M. (1997). The relation of environment to anti-environment. In M. Moos (Ed.), Media research: Technology, art, communication. Amsterdam: G&B Arts International.
  • McLuhan, M. (2003). The Book of probes. Corte Madera, CA: Ginkgo Press.
  • Mehan, H., Hertweck, A., & Meihls, J. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitra, S. (2010, January 3). The Child-Driven Education [TED Talks], Videorecording Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/speakers/sugata_mitra.html
  • Mitra, S., & Vivek, R. (2001). Children and the Internet: Experiments with minimally invasive education in India. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 221–232.10.1111/bjet.2001.32.issue-2
  • Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S., Jha, S., Bisht, R. S., & Kapur, P. (2005). Acquisition of computing literacy on shared public computers: Children and the ‘hole in the wall’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 407–426.
  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.
  • Noer, M. (2012 November, 19). One man, one computer, 10 million students: How Khan academy is reinventing education. Forbes, 398–407.
  • Nordkvelle, Y. (2004). Technology and didactics: Historical mediations of a relation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 427–444.10.1080/0022027032000159476
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A Practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
  • Otte, G. (1995). In-Voicing: Beyond the voice debate. In J. Gallop (Ed.), Pedagogy: The question of impersonation (pp. 147–154). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Pelletier, C. (2006). Agency and pleasure in the computer games and education debate: Using Zizek’s concept of interpassivity to analyse educational play. E-Learning, 2, 317–326.
  • Pelletier, C. (2009). Emancipation, equality and education: Rancière’s critique of Bourdieu and the question of performativity. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 30, 137–150.10.1080/01596300902809054
  • Popkewitz, T. (2010). History of Curriculum. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of curriculum studies (pp. 181–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Prior, N. (2010). The rise of the new amateurs: popular music, digital technology and the fate of cultural production. In J. R. Hall, L. Grindstaff, & M. -C. Lo (Eds.), Culture: A sociological handbook. London: Routledge.
  • Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Rancière, J. (1995). On the shores of politics. New York, NY: Verso.
  • Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics: The distribution of the sensible. London & New York: Continuum.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and Narrative, Vol. 1. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
  • Skrtic, T. (1995). Disability and democracy: Restructuring (special) education for postmodernity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Squire, K. (2008). Open-ended video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age. In K. Salen (Ed.), The Ecology of Games: Connecting youth, games, and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Stamp, R. (2012). Of Slumdogs and Schoolmasters: Jacotot. Rancière and Mitra on self-organised learning, Educational Philosophy & Theory, 45, 647–662.
  • Tiles, M., & Oberdiek, H. (1995). Living in a Technological culture: Human tools and human values. London: Routledge.
  • Walker, J. T. (1987). A Narrative critique of practical texts in education. Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zuboff, S. (1998). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.