References
- Ackerman, R. J. (1988). Wittgenstein’s city. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
- Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage.
- Bryant, A. (2009). Grounded theory and pragmatism: The curious case of Anselm Strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(3), Article 2. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090325
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
- Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–194). California, CA: Left Coast Press.
- Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
- Denzin, N. L., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
- Gilroy, P. (1996). Meaning without words: Philosophy and non-verbal communication. Aldershot: Avebury.
- Greckhamer, T., & Koro‐Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 729–750. doi:10.1080/09518390500298204
- Hallett, G. S. J. (1967). Wittgenstein’s definition of meaning as use. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
- Jeon, Y.-H. (2004). The application of grounded theory and symbolic interactionism. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18, 249–256. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00287.x
- Khatchadourian, H. (1966). Common Names and “Family Resemblances”. In G. Pitcher (Ed.), Modern studies in philosophy: A collection of essays edited by George Pitcher (pp. 205–230). London: Macmillan.
- Lo, C. O. (2014). Enhancing groundedness in realist grounded theory research. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 61–76. doi:10.1037/qup0000001
- Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 25–35. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/16094069060050010310.1177/160940690600500103
- Phillips, D. L. (1977). Wittgenstein and scientific knowledge. London: The Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-03160-3
- Piantanida, M., Tananis, C. A., & Grubs, R. E. (2007). Generating grounded theory of/for educational practice: The journey of three epistemorphs. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17, 325–346. doi:10.1080/0951839042000204661
- Pin-Fat, V. (2010). Universality, ethics and international relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–213). London: Sage.
- Simmons, O. E. (2011). Why classic grounded theory? In V. B. Martin, & A. Gynnild (Eds.), Grounded theory: The philosophy, method and work of Barney Glaser (pp. 15–30). Boca Raton, FL: BrownWalker Press.
- Slade, M., & Priebe, S. (Eds.). (2006). Choosing methods in mental health research: Mental health research from theory to practice. London: Routledge.
- Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations: Revised 4th edition by P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. (G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte, Trans.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.