710
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unpacking ontological security: A decolonial reading of scholarly impact

&

References

  • Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D., Antonacopoulou, E., & Cummings, T. (2014). Scholarly impact: A pluralist conceptualization. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 623–639. doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0121
  • Aguinis, H., Suarez-Gonzalez, I., Lannelongue, G., & Joo, H. (2012). Scholarly impact revisited. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(2), 105–132.10.5465/amp.2011.0088
  • Ahenakew, C. (2016). Grafting indigenous ways of knowing onto non-indigenous ways of being: The (under-estimated) challenges of a decolonial imagination. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 323–340.10.1525/irqr.2016.9.3.323
  • Andreotti, V. (2016). (Re)imagining education as an un-coercive re-arrangement of desires. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 5(1), 79–88.
  • Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 4(1), 21–40.
  • Baffoe, M., Asimeng-Boahene, L., & Ogbuagu, B. C. (2014). Their way or no way: “Whiteness” as agent for marginalizing and silencing minority voices in academic research and publication. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 13–32. doi:10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n1p13
  • Benneworth, P. (2015). Putting impact into context: The Janus face of the public value of arts and humanities research. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–8.10.1177/1474022214533893
  • Crease, R. P., & Goldhaber, A. S. (2014). The quantum moment: How Planck, Bohr, Einstein, and Heisenberg taught us to love uncertainty. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
  • Dei, G. J. S. (Ed.). (2011). Indigenous philosophies and critical education: A reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2010). Search engines and the production of academic knowledge. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(6), 574–592. doi:10.1177/1367877910376582
  • Dussel, E. D. (1985). Philosophy of liberation. Maryknoll, N.Y: Orbis Books.
  • Evans, R. (2016). Achieving and evidencing research ‘impact’? Tensions and dilemmas from an ethic of care perspective. Area, 48(2), 213–221. doi:10.1111/area.12256
  • Fonseka, C. (2011). Buddhism and empiricism. The Island Online. Retrieved January 15, 2017, from http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=32050
  • Gardner, J., Holmes, B., & Leitch, R. (2008). Where there is smoke, there is (the potential for) fire: Soft indicators of research and policy impact. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 89–104. doi:10.1080/03057640801890004
  • Gibbons, M. (2008). Why is translation important? Grounding the conversation. Retrieved from http://ktdrr.org/ktlibrary/articles_pubs/ncddrwork/focus/focus21/Focus21.pdf
  • Giroux, H. A. (2004). Cultural studies, public pedagogy, and the responsibility of intellectuals. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 59–79. doi:10.1080/1479142042000180926
  • Gorard, S. (2008). A re‐consideration of rates of ‘social mobility’ in Britain: Or why research impact is not always a good thing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(3), 317–324. doi:10.1080/01425690801966402
  • Izutsu, T. (2008). The structure of oriental philosophy: Collected papers of the Eranos Conference. Keio: Keio University Press.
  • Kolowich, S. (2010, December 17). New measures of scholarly impact. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/12/17/scholars_develop_new_metrics_for_journals_impact
  • Lagier, D. G. (2003). The paradoxes of action: Human action, law and philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-0205-8
  • Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the colonality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270. doi:10.1080/09502380601162548
  • McCormack, B. (2011). Engaged scholarship and research impact: Integrating the doing and using of research in practice. Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(2), 111–127. doi:10.1177/1744987110393419
  • Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394501
  • Nakagawa, Y. (2000). Education for awakening: An Eastern approach to holistic education. Brandon: Education Renewal.
  • Nishitani, K. (1982). Religion and nothingness. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Ordorika, I., & Lloyd, M. (2014). International rankings and the contest for university hegemony. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 385–405. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.979247
  • Osei-Kofi, N. (2012). Junior faculty of color in the corporate university: Implications of neoliberalism and neoconservatism on research, teaching and service. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 229–244. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.672326
  • Piwowar, H. (2013). Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 8–9. doi:10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404
  • Ropers-Huilman, R., & Winters, K. T. (2011). Feminist research in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 667–690.10.1080/00221546.2011.11777223
  • Schnitzler, K., Davies, N., Ross, F., & Harris, R. (2016). Using TwitterTM to drive research impact: A discussion of strategies, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 59, 15–26.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.004
  • Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing evidence-based education and policy movement: Revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206.
  • Shahjahan, R. A., Blanco-Ramirez, G., & Andreotti, V. (2017). Attempting to imagine the unimaginable: A decolonial reading of global university rankings (GURs). Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S51–S73.
  • Shiva, V. (1995). Monocultures of the mind. London: Zed Books.
  • Smith, A. (2006). Heteropatriarchy and the three pillars of white supremacy rethinking women of color organizing. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), The color of violence (pp. 66–73). Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.
  • Smith, M. (2010). Gender, whiteness, and “other Others” in the academy. In S. Razack, M. Smith, & S. Thobani (Eds.), States of race: Critical race feminism for the 21st century (pp. 23–35). Toronto: Between the Lines.
  • Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. (2007). Beyond abyssal thinking: From global lines to ecologies of knowledges. Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais 80 ( June 29). http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-06-29-santos-en.html.
  • Stein, S., Hunt, D., Suša, R., & Andreotti, V. (2017). The educational challenge of unraveling the fantasies of ontological security. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 11(2), 69–79. doi:10.1080/15595692.2017.1291501
  • Stewart, B. (2015). Open to influence: What counts as academic influence in scholarly networked Twitter participation. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 287–309. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547
  • Sudbury, J., & Okazawa-Rey, M. (2009). Activist scholarship: Antiracism, feminism, and social change. Florence: Routledge Ltd.. doi:10.4324/9781315636177
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W.. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
  • Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wagner, A., & Yee, J. Y. (2011). Framing resistance in higher education: Implicating neo-liberalism. Canadian Social Work Review, 28(1), 89–105.
  • Watermeyer, R. (2014). Issues in the articulation of ‘impact’: The responses of UK academics to ‘impact’ as a new measure of research assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 359–377. doi:10.1080/03075079.2012.709490
  • Watermeyer, R. (2016). Impact in the REF: Issues and obstacles. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 199–214.
  • Weller, K. (2014). Social media and altmetrics: An overview of current alternative approaches to measuring scholarly impact. In I. M. Welpe, J. Wollershiem, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and performance: Governance of research organizations (pp. 261–276). London: Springer.
  • Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century (pp. 847–857). Utrecht: SURF foundation.
  • Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.10.1353/ncr.2004.0015

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.