Sexuality as movement

References

• Abel, G., & Fitzgerald, L. (2006). ‘When you come to it you feel like a dork asking a guy to put a condom on’: Is sex education addressing young people’s understandings of risk? Sex Education, 6(2), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. (2005). Sexual subjects: Young people, sexuality and education. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L., & Carmody, M. (2012). Pleasure has no passport: Re-visiting the potential of pleasure in sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 455–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Author and Co. (2013). Teaching pleasure and danger in sexuality education. Sex Education, 13(2), 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (1889). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (F. l. Pogson, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (1896). Matter and memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (1997). The Queen of America goes to Washington City: Essays of sex and citizenship. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2000). Comment on Felski’s “The doxa of difference”: Working through sexual difference. In C. Allen & J. A. Howard (Eds.), Provoking feminisms (pp. 93–110). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2002). Identity, subjectivity and difference: A critical genealogy. In G. Griffin & R. Braidotti (Eds.), Thinking differently: A reader in European women’s studies (pp. 158–180). London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. (2005). Ethical erotics: Reconceptualising anti-rape education. Sexualities, 8(4), 465–480.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. (2009). ‘Sex & ethics’: The sexual ethics education program for young people. Melbourne: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M., & Carrington, K. (2000). Preventing sexual violence? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolpijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Review Office. (2007). The teaching of sexuality education in years 7–13 (June 2007). Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports/The-Teaching-of-Sexuality-Education-in-Years-7-13-June-2007/Introduction
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K. (2018). Sexuality education in New Zealand: A policy for social justice? Sex Education, 18(5), 601–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatens, M., & Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. (1996). The sex-education component of school science programmes as a ‘micro-technology’ of power. Women’s Studies Journal, 12(1), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics and art. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggis, J., & Mulholland, M. (2014). Rethinking difference and sex education; From cultural inclusivity to normative diversity. Sex Education, 14(1), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and difference (Stambaugh, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Affect as method: Feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & Ringrose, J. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irigaray, L. (1977). This sex which is not one (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Weatherall, A. (2010). The (im)possibilities of feminist school based sexuality education. Feminism and Psychology, 20(2), 166–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. (2010). Towards a sexual ethics curriculum: Bringing philosphy and society to bear on individual development. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, S. (2014). The hard work of pleasure. In L. Allen, M. Rasmussen, & K. Quinlivan (Eds.), The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound (pp. 138–152). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: Male and female in western philosophy. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Measor, L., C. Tiffin, & K. Miller. (2000). Young people’s views on sex education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, S. (1996). Uniform bodies? Disciplining sexuality in school 1968–1995. Women’s Studies Journal, 12(2), 9–36.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, E. (1981). Truby King and the Plunket Society: An analysis of a prescriptive ideology. New Zealand Journal of History, 15(1), 3–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polt, R. (1999). Heidegger: An introduction. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Feminisms refiguring ‘sexualisation’, sexuality and the girl. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (1995). Conversations on science, culture, and time (R. Lapidus, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talburt, S. (2009). Toys pleasure and the future. In R. DePalma & E. Atkinson. (Eds.), Interrogating heteronormativity in primary schools: The no outsiders project (pp. 85–94). Trent: Trentham Books
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Wellings, K., Field, J., Johnson, A.M., Wadsworth, J., & Bradshaw S. (1994). Sexual behaviour in Britain: The national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar