Students are not inferential-misfits: Naturalising logic in the science classroom

References

• Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G., & Elliott, D. (2010). An emerging decolonizing science education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(4), 321–338.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. C. (1934). The mystery of scientific discovery. Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 224–236.
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiasson, P. (2005). Peirce’s design for thinking: An embedded philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, V. B. (2005). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79(3), 313–333.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. J., Schreiber, J. B., & Moss, C. M. (2005). Belief, doubt and reason: C. S. Peirce on education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Deely, J., & Semetsky, I. (2017). Semiotics, edusemiotics and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(3), 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. (2017). A video-based analysis of science students? computer-mediated abductive reasoning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30097364
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, P. J. (1992). Authentic science and school science. International Journal of Science Education 14(3), 265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 12–32). Newark: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery—An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. R. (1960). Is there a logic of scientific discovery? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 38(2), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. (1999). Inqiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, A. (2009). Authentic scientific inquiry and school science. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 55(2), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jantzen, B. C. (2016). Discovery without a ‘logic’ would be a miracle. Synthese, 193(10), 3209–3238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 97–137.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, W., & Beard, D. (2008). Toulmin’s rhetorical logic: What’s the warrant for warrants? Philosophy & Rhetoric, 41(1), 22–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. (1987). The logic of discovery. Philosophy of Science, 54(3), 435–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugg, A. (1985). The process of discovery. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science—Processes of discovery and explanation. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific reasoning. Semiotica, 153(1–4), 261–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition—The epistemological and eco-cognitve dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2015a). The eco-cognitive model of abduction Ἀπαγωγ now: Naturalizing the logic of abduction. Journal of Applied Logic, 13(3), 285–315.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2015b). Naturalizing logic: Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science. Journal of Applied Logic, 13(1), 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C. L. (2005). Knowing truth: Peirce’s epistemology in an educational context. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• Midtgarden, T. (2005). On the prospects of a semiotic theory of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 177–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992a). On a new list of categories. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1867–1893) (Vol. 1, pp. 1–10). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992b). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1867—1893) (Vol. 1, pp. 11–27). London: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992c). The fixation of belief. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1867–1893) (Vol. 1, pp. 109–123). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992d). How to make our ideas clear. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1867–1893) (Vol. 1, pp. 124–141). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992e). Deduction, induction and hypothesis. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1867–1893) (Vol. 1, pp. 186–199). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998a). What is a sign? In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 4–10). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998b). Of reasoning in general. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 11–26). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998c). The nature of meaning. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 208–225). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998d). Pragmatism as the logic of abduction. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 226–241). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998e). Sundry logical conceptions. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 265–288). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998f). What pragmatism is. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 331–345). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1998g). Pragmatism. In N. Houser, A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, C. L. Clark, A. C. Lewis, & D. B. Davis (Eds.), The essential Peirce—Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913) (Vol. 2, pp. 398–433). Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22(3), 224–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. (2008). Indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum: Avoiding neo-colonialism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 663–702.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2005a). Peirce and education: An introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2005b). Peirce’s semiotics, subdoxastic aboutness, and the paradox of inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A. (2005). Peircean theory, psychosemiotics, and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tursman, R. (1987). Peirce’s theory of scientific discovery—A system of logic conceived as semiotic. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J. (2013). Errors of reasoning—Naturalizing the logic of inference. London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar