The case for academic plagiarism education: A PESA Executive collective writing project

References

• Bayne, S., Evans, P., Ewins, R., Knox, J., Lamb, J., Macleod, H., O’Shea, C., Ross, J., Sheail, P., & Sinclair, C. (2020). The manifesto for teaching online. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2021). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1880387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2017). Don't be fooled by ignorant schoolmasters: On the role of the teacher in emancipatory education. Policy Futures in Education, 15(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316681202
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, A. (2015). China's Shanzhai culture: ‘Grabism’and the politics of hybridity. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(92), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.932159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditcher, A., & Hunter, S. (2000). The instrumental student: An increasing problem? A survey of academic staff at the University of Canterbury. Educational Research and Advisory Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrich, J., Howard, S., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltýnek, T., Dlabolová, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Razı, S., Kravjar, J., Kamzola, L., Guerrero-Dib, J., Çelik, Ö., & Weber-Wulff, D. (2020). Testing of support tools for plagiarism detection. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00192-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). What is an author? In P. Rabinow (Ed.). The Foucault reader (pp. 101–120).Random House, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Geilas, A., & Fyfe, A. (2020). Special issue: Editorship and the editing of scientific journals, 1750–1950. Centaurus, 62(1), 1–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, S. (2013). A cultural bridge for the academic concept of plagiarism: A comparison of Chinese and British cultural concepts of plagiarism by Chinese master’s graduates of UK institutions employed by sino-foreign joint ventures in Shanghai, China. Plagiarism across Europe and Beyond—Conference Proceedings (pp. 27–41), Brno, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Halgamuge, M. N. (2017). The use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, B. C. (2017). Shanzhai: Deconstruction in Chinese. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, E., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1993). Peer imitation by Toddlers in laboratory, home, and day-care contexts: Implications for social learning and memory. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, J. (2010, June). Shanzhai: Economic/cultural production through the cracks of globalization [Paper presentation]. Cultural Studies Conference, Crossroads, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2017). Institutional policies on plagiarism: The case of eight Chinese universities of foreign languages/international studies. System, 66, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, R. (2018). Education between speech and writing: Crossing the boundaries of Dao and Deconstruction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. X., Miller, G. J., & Wyckoff, T. W. (2019). Comprehending the cultural causes of English writing plagiarism in Chinese students at a Western-Style University. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3441-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P. (2021). A peer-reviewed scholarly article. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00202-8
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1690). The second treatise of Government. http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/LockeBook_Property_and_Tax.htm#::text=27.,may%20say%2C%20are%20properly%20his.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, Á. (2021). Towards a higher education: Contemplation, compassion, and the ethics of slowing down. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(5), 411–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1683826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mika, C., & Southey, K. (2016). Exploring whakaaro: A way of responsive thinking in Maori research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1204905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mika, C., & Stewart, G. (2015). Māori in the kingdom of the Gaze: Subjects or critics? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(3), 300–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, P. (2006). Plagued by plagiarism. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(37), A45–A46.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. S. & Stommel, J. A guide for resisting edtech: The case against turnitin. Critical Pedagogy. https://hybridpedagogy.org/resisting-edtech/
   Google Scholar
• Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, J., Hanham, J., & Ullman, J. (2018). Exploring intentional use of a technological proxy, Turnitin, to enhance student academic literacy practices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patry, W. F. (1994). Copyright law and practice (vol. 1). Bureau of National Affairs. http://digital-law-ponline.info/patry/patry2.html
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (Ed.) (2009). Academic writing, genres and philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jayne White, E., Tesar, M., Gibbons, A., Arndt, S., Rutanen, N., Degotardi, S., Salamon, A., Browne, K., Redder, B., Charteris, J., Gould, K., Warren, A., Delaune, A., Kamenarac, O., Hood, N., & Sturm, S. (2020) Infantologies. An EPAT collective writing project. Educational Philosophy and Theory, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1835648
   Google Scholar
• Pigman, G. W. (1980). Versions of imitation in the renaissance. Renaissance Quarterly, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2861533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., & Macleod, H. (2018). Surveillance, (dis)trust and teaching with plagiarism detection technology. Proceedings of Networked Learning 2018, Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Southey, K. M. (2020). Re-presenting Māori and Indigenous understandings of Being: Deconstructing the notion of mental illness [PhD thesis]. The University of Waikato. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/13554
   Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and Pedagogies. Computers Computers & EducationEducation, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Tesar, M. (2020). Philosophy as a method: Tracing the histories of intersections of ‘philosophy’, ‘methodology’ and ‘education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420934144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, M. (2021). Future studies: Reimagining our educational futures in the post-Covid-19 world. Policy Futures in Education, 19(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320986950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, F. -N., & Turner, M. (2011). Clear and simple as the truth: Writing classic prose. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber-Wulff, D. (2019). Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem. Nature, 567(7749), 435–435. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00893-5 https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00893-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William, D. (2013). ‘Imitate Me’: Interpreting imitation in 1 Corinthians in relation to Ignatius of Antioch. Perichoresis, 11(1), 75–93.
   Google Scholar