‘In numbers we trust’: Statistical data as governing technologies in the era of student achievement and school accountability

References

• Dean, M. (1991). The constitution of poverty: Toward a genealogy of liberal governance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1990). How to make things which hold together: Social science, statistics and the state. In P. Wagner, B. Wittrock, & R. Whitley (Eds.), Discourses on society: The shaping of the social science disciplines (pp. 195–218). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. 2nd ed. Vintage Books ed. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S., & Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data: Scotland, England and the European education policy space. British Educational Research Journal, 36(6), 937–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903275865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, globalisation and education policy. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, N. (2009). Educational research, governmentality and the construction of the cosmopolitan citizen. Ethics and Education, 4(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449640903368781
   Google Scholar
• Inda, J. X. (2006). Targeting immigrants: Government, technology, and ethics. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2016). Making strong performers and successful reformers: Global impact of OECD PISA and curriculum reform in South Korea [Doctoral Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Accession Order No. 10125984).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2020). Problematizing global educational governance of OECD PISA: Student achievement, categorization, and social inclusion and exclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(14), 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1732928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2007). An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 8(2), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashiti, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (2011). PISA as a political instrument: One history behind the formulating of the PISA programme. In M. A. Pereyra., H. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 17–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, R., & McBride, S. (2009). Standardizing and disseminating knowledge: The role of the OECD in global governance. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2007). How to become an influential factor: The comparative turn in OECD education policy. In K. Martens, A. Rusconi, & K. Lutz (Eds.), Transformations of the state and global governance (pp. 40–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2010). Governance by comparison: How ratings & rakings impact national policy-making in education [TranState working papers, No. 139].
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1993). Governing economic life. In M. Gane & T. Johnson (Eds.), Foucault’s new domains (pp. 75–105). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, P. T. (2011). Singapore’s response to the global war for talent: Politics and education. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. Y. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006032000162002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (1997). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. 2). OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014c). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J., & Lingard, B. (2007). Gobalisation, education policy and politics. In B. Lingard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 65–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, G. S. (1994). Education 1960-1990: The OECD perspective. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. Teachers College Record.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2011). PISA: Numbers, standardizing conduct, and the alchemy of school subject. In M. A. Pereyra, H. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 31–46). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spring, J. (1998). Education and the rise of the global economy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D. (2010). Harmonizing the educational globe. World polity, cultural features, and the challenges to education research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9155-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tröhler, D., Meyer, H.-D., Labaree, D., & Hutt, E. (2014). Accountability: Antecedents, power, and processes. Teachers College Record, 16(9), 1–12.
   Google Scholar