3,812
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SPECIAL ISSUE - Teaching About Climate Change in the Midst of Ecological Crisis: Responsibilities, Challenges, and Possibilities

Discovering earth and the missing masses—technologically informed education for a post-sustainable future

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1148-1158 | Received 09 Jun 2021, Accepted 17 Mar 2022, Published online: 07 Apr 2022

References

  • Anders, G. (1972). Commandments in the atomic age. In C. Mitcham & R. Mackey (Eds.), Philosophy and technology. Readings in the philosophical problems of technology (pp. 130–135). Free Press.
  • Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
  • Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity.
  • Beier, J. (2017). The future is cancelled: From Melancholia to belief in the world. In J. Jagodzinski, (Ed.), The precarious future of education (pp. 277–299). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • BIOS. (2020). Transition employment. https://dashboard.bios.fi/transition-employment/
  • Bookchin, M. (1982). The ecology of freedom. The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Cheshire Books.
  • Bowers, C. A. (2000). Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and the prospects of ecological sustainability. University of Georgia Press.
  • Brooks, H. (1986). The typology of surprises in technology, institutions and development. In W. C. Clark, & R. E. Munn, (Eds.) Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 325–348). IIASA.
  • Dakers, J. R. (2011). The rise of technological literacy in primary education. In C. Benson, & J. Lunt, (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years. (pp. 181–193). Brill.
  • Elhacham, E., Ben-Uri, L., Grozovski, J., Bar-On, Y. M., & Milo, R. (2020). Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature, 588(7838), 442–444.
  • Ellul, J. (1980). The technological system. Continuum.
  • Ellul, J. (1989). The search for ethics in a technicist society. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 9, 23–36.
  • Elshof, L. (2006). Productivism and the product paradigm in technological education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(2), 18–32. volumehttps://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v17i2.a.2
  • Emerson, R. W. (1836). Nature. James Munroe and Company. Retrieved June 9, 2021 via Internet Archive.
  • Foster, J. (2017). Hope after sustainability—tragedy and transformation. Global Discourse, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1300401
  • Gaudiano, E. J. G. (2010). Education against climate change: information and technological focus are not enough. In I. Ruth, (Ed.), Climate change and philosophy: Transformational possibilities (pp. 131–142). Continuum.
  • Gerrie, J. B. (2003). Environmental ethics: Should we preserve the red herring and flounder? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021702309722
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. Harper & Row.
  • Heikkinen, A. (2020). Culture and VET—an outdated connection?. In P. Eigenmann, P. Gonon, & M. Weil, (Eds.), Opening and extending vocational education (pp. 361–381). Peter Lang CH.
  • Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
  • Hohti, R., Paakkari, A., & Stenberg, K. (2019). Smartphones—leaping and dancing with digitality: Exploring human-smartphone-entanglements in classrooms. In P. Rautio, & E. Stenvall, (Eds.), Social, material and political constructs of arctic childhoods (pp. 85–102). Springer.
  • Hornborg, A. (2021). Reversing the industrial revolution. In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska, (Eds.), Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 182–197). Oxford University Press.
  • Jickling, B., & Sterling, S. (2017). Post-sustainability and environmental education: Framing issues. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education (pp. 1–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jochum, G. (2021). Dialectics of technical emancipation: Considerations on a reflexive, sustainable technology development. NanoEthics, 15(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-021-00387-7
  • Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. Peter Lang.
  • Keary, M. (2016). The new Prometheans: Technological optimism in climate change mitigation modelling. Environmental Values, 25(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327115X14497392134801
  • Knutsson, B. (2018). Green machines? Destabilizing discourse in technology education for sustainable development. Critical Education, 9(3), 1–18.
  • Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
  • Larrère, C. (2012). Two philosophies of the environmental crisis. In D. Bergandi, (Ed.), The structural links between ecology, evolution and ethics (pp. 141–149). Springer.
  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Polity.
  • Le Grange, L. (2017). Environmental education after sustainability. In B. Jickling, & S. Sterling, (Eds.) Post-sustainability and environmental education (pp. 93–107). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge university press.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Signet.
  • Mills, S. (Ed.). (1997). Turning away from technology: A new vision for the 21st century. Sierra Club Books.
  • Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
  • Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A. Review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414511
  • Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Paredis, E. (2011). Sustainability transitions and the nature of technology. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9197-4
  • Puech, M. (2017). A non-confrontational art of living in the technosphere and infosphere. Foundations of Science, 22(2), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9452-9
  • Pulkki, J., Varpanen, J., & Mullen, J. (2020). Ecosocial philosophy of education: Ecologizing the opinionated self. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 40, 347–364.
  • Roos, A. (2021). Earthing philosophy of technology: A case for ontological materialism. In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska, (Eds.) Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 59–95). Oxford University Press.
  • Ruiz-Mallén, I., & Heras, M. (2020). What sustainability? Higher education institutions’ pathways to reach the agenda 2030 goals. Sustainability, 12(4), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041290
  • Ruuska, T., & Heikkurinen, P. (2021). Technology and sustainability: An introduction. In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska, (Eds.) Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
  • Sconfienza, U. M. (2019). The post-sustainability trilemma. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156
  • Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological determinism in american culture. In M. R. S. L. Marx, (Ed.), Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism (pp. 1–35). MIT Press.
  • Vadén, T. (2021). What does fossil energy tell us about technology? In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska, (Eds.), Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 161–181). Oxford University Press.
  • Vadén, T., Lähde, V., Majava, A., Järvensivu, P., Toivanen, T., Hakala, E., & Eronen, J. T. (2020). Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236–244.
  • Vadén, T. (2017, April 26). Käärme ja skorpioni etsivät elefantinjalkaa. Peruste. https://perustelehti.fi/kaarme-ja-skorpioni-etsivat-elefantinjalkaa/
  • Värri, V. M. (2018). Kasvatus ekokriisin aikakaudella. Vastapaino.
  • Virilio, P. (2007). The original accident. Polity.
  • Wallgren, T., & Toivakainen, N. (2021). The question of technology: from noise to reflection. In P. Heikkurinen, & T. Ruuska (Eds.), Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 29–58). Oxford University Press.
  • Webster, M. D. (2017). Philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 25–36.
  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
  • Winner, L. (1983). Technologies as forms of life. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Epistemology, methodology, and the social sciences (pp. 249–263). Springer.