From the Archimedean point to circles in the sand—Post-sustainable curriculum and the critical subject

References

• Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, T. (2006). Subjectivity, curriculum, and society: Between and beyond the German Didaktik and Anglo-American curriculum studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailin, S., & Siegel, H. (2009). Critical thinking. In N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith, & P. Standish (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to philosophy of education (pp. 181–193). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2015). A curriculum for critical being. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (pp. 63–76). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. (2020). Environmental consciousness, nature and the philosophy of education: Ecologizing education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C. (2022). Promoting critical thinking in anti-critical thinking times: Lessons from COVID discourse. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 29(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.7202/1088374ar
   Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C., & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In T. Popkewitz & L. Fendler (Eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics (pp. 45–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daggett, C. (2018). Petro-masculinity: Fossil fuels and authoritarian desire. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 47(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818775817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, G. (2015). Beyond critical thinking to critical being: Criticality in higher education and life. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. (Ed.). (2018). Post-sustainability: Tragedy and transformation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grušovnik, T. (2012). Environmental denial: Why we fail to change our environmentally damaging practices. Synthesis Philosophica, 27(1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, G. B., & Dall’Alba, G. (2020). What is an ideal critical thinker expected to conclude about anthropogenic global warming? Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 24(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.7202/1070608ar
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, D. M. (2017). Energy without conscience. Oil, climate change and complicity. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC (2018). Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jickling, B., & Sterling, S. (Eds.). (2017). Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey, E., & Armstrong, C. (2012). Finding hope in a world of environmental catastrophe. In A. E. Wals & P. B. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 187–200). Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kiilakoski, T. (Ed.). (2022). Sustainability Youth Barometer 2021. Publications of the Finnish Youth Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2011). Critical ontology: Visions of selfhood and curriculum. In K. Hayes, S. R. Steinberg, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 201–217). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2019). Culture and the independent self: Obstacles to environmental sustainability? Anthropocene, 26, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2021). Student-centered learning and sustainability: Solution or problem? Comparative Education Review, 65(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/711829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortekallio, K. (2019). Becoming-instrument: Thinking with Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation and Timothy Morton’s Hyperobjects. In S. Karkulehto, A. K. Koistinen, & E. Varis (Eds.), Reconfiguring human, nonhuman and posthuman in literature and culture (pp. 57–75). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynas, M., Houlton, B. Z., & Perry, S. (2021). Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 16(11), 114005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M., & Islar, M. (2021). The ‘end of the world’ vs. the ‘end of the month’: Understanding social resistance to sustainability transition agendas, a lesson from the Yellow Vests in France. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00877-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. (2021). From the fossil curriculum to the post-carbon curriculum: Histories and dilemmas. In B. Green, P. Roberts, & M. Brennan (Eds.), Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world (pp. 325–345). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T., & Boyer, D. (2021). Hyposubjects: On becoming human. Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1982). Teaching critical thinking in the “strong” sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v4i2.2766
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, H. (2023). From critical thinking to criticality and back again. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 57(2), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihkala, P. (2020). Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety. Sustainability, 12(19), 7836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F., & Bowers, C. A. (1992). Politics of curriculum: Origins, controversies, and significance of critical perspectives. Review of Research in Education, 18(1), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X018001163
   Google Scholar
• Pulkki, J. (2023). Humility imparts the wonders of nature: A virtue-ethical elaboration of some of Michael Bonnett’s thoughts. Environmental Education Research, 29(6), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2083082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkki, J., & Keto, S. (2022). Ecosocial autonomy as an educational ideal. Rel.: Beyond Anthropocentrism, 10, 75.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A. (1997). Ecofeminism as politics. Nature, Marx and the postmodern. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, A., & Vadén, T. (2015). Energy and experience. MCM.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvé, L. (2017). Education as life. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future (pp. 111–124). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. E. O., Benoit, L., Clayton, S., Parnes, M. F., Swenson, L., & Lowe, S. R. (2023). Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer. Current Psychology, 42, 16708–16721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sconfienza, U. M. (2019). The post-sustainability trilemma. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(6), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1673156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Takkinen, P., & Pulkki, J. (2023). Discovering earth and the missing masses—Technologically informed education for a post-sustainable future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(10), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2060816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G. (2018, December 12). School strike for climate – Save the world by changing the rules [Video]. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAmmUIEsN9A&t=65s
   Google Scholar
• Vadén, T. (2021). What does fossil energy tell us about technology? In P. Heikkurinen & T. Ruuska (Eds.), Sustainability beyond technology: Philosophy, critique, and implications for human organization (pp. 161–181). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vadén, T., & Salminen, A. (2018). Ethics, Nafthism, and the fossil subject. Relations, 6(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2018-001-vade
   Google Scholar
• Värri, V. M. (2018). Kasvatus ekokriisin aikakaudella. Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar