Schoolboards' expectations of the superintendent – a Swedish national survey

References

• Addi-Raccah, A. (2015). School principals´ role in the interplay between the superintendents and the local education authorities. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2012-0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, G. (1992). Statlig styrning och kommunal skoladministration. En rapport från SLAV-projektet [State Governance and municipal school administration. A report from the SLAV-project]. Uppsala universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and educational reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945656
   Google Scholar
• Björk, L. G., Johansson, O., & Bredeson, P. (2014). International comparison of the influence of educational reform on superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(49), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945658
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, W. L., & Crowson, R. L. (2002). The guest for a new hierarchy in education: From loose coupling back to tight? Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210446018
   Google Scholar
• Carver, J. (1997). Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in nonprofit and public organizations (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2010). Women at the top: Powerful leaders define success as work + family in a culture of gender. American Psychologist, 65(3), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldren, A., & Spillane, J. (2007). Making connections to teaching practice: The role of boundary practices in instructional leadership. Educational Policy, 21(2), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805284121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copich, C. B. (2013). The role of the local schoolboard in improving student learning. EDAD 9550 Symposium of School Leadership. University of Nebraska at Omaha https://www.unomaha.edu/college-of-education/moec/_files/docs/publications/edad9550-copich-research-spring2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eadie, D. C. (2005). Five habits of high-impact schoolboards. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, J. M. (1992). School-based decision making: A principal-agent perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737014004333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusarelli, B. C. (2006). Schoolboards and superintendent relations. Issues of continuity, conflict, and community. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 9(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458905285011
   Google Scholar
• Fuzarelli, L. D. (2002). Tightly coupled policy in loosely coupled systems: Institutional capacity and organizational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210446045
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Dreeben, R. (1986). Coupling and control in educational organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4), 612–632. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1984). Are validity and reliability “relevant“ in qualitative evaluation research? Evaluation & the Health Professions, 7(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/016327878400700403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, S. (2013). Evaluating the superintendent: The role of the schoolboard. NCPEA Education Leadership Review, 14(3), 62–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105391.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., Ruiter, M., & van Thiel, S. (2020). Are school boards and educational quality related? Results of an international literature review. Educational Review, 72(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1487387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, E., & Honingh, M. (2014). Are schoolboards aware of the educational quality of their schools? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510509
   Google Scholar
• Horne, S. (1992). Organisation and change within educational systems: Some implications of a loose-coupling model. Educational Management and Administration, 20(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/174114329202000204
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2011). School governance in Switzerland: Tensions between new roles and old traditions. Educational Management Administration, 39(4), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211405349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, O., Nihlfors, E., Jervik Steen, L., & Karlsson, S. (2016). Superintendents in Sweden: Structures, cultural relations and leadership. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 139–173). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, O., & Nihlfors, E. (2014). The Swedish superintendent in the policy stream. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945652
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Seashore Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. R. (2006). What schoolboards can do: Reform governance for urban schools. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H.-D. (2002). From “loose coupling” to “tight management”? Making sense of the changing landscape in management and organization theory. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210454992
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., & Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Comparing Nordic educational governance. In L. Moos & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), School boards in the governance process (pp. 1–10). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Paulsen, J. M. (2016). Directions for our investigation of the chain of governance and the agents. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 1–21). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., & Risku, M. (2016). Governmentality through translation and sense-making. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 287–310). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mushtaq, S., & Akhtar, M. S. (2014). A study to investigate the effect of demographic variables on leadership styles used by department heads in universities. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 10(1), 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet (revised 2016) [Curriculum for the elementary school, pre-school class and leisure centre]. Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Oshagbemi, T. (2004). Age influences on the leadership styles and behavior of managers. Employee Relations, 26(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450410506878
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., Nihlfors, E., Brinkkjaer, U., & Risku, M. (2016). Superintendent leadership in hierarchy and network. In L. Moos, E. Nihlfors, & J. M. Paulsen (Eds.), Nordic superintendents: Agents in a broken chain (pp. 207–231). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., & Hoyer, H. C. (2016). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-5949-2016-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovic, N. (2014). Effects of gender differences on leadership styles through the impact on school environment. Studia Edukacyjne, 31, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.14746/se.2014.31.17
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2010). A systemic perspective oh school reform. Principals´ and chief education officers´ perspectives on school development. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111102054
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, S. (2011). The director of education as a leader of pedagogical issues: A study of leadership in municipal educational sector activities. School Leadership and Management, 31(5), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587405
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, S., Segolsson, M., & Aktas, V. (2017). The director of education and research-based education. Exploring the tension between policy and what directors actually report. International Journal of Research and Education, 2(4), 1–12. http://onlinejournal.org.uk/index.php/ijre/issue/view/30/showToc
   Google Scholar
• Risku, M., Kanervio, P., & Björk, L. G. (2014). Finnish superintendents: Leading in a changing education policy context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945653
   Google Scholar
• Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1191/096228099671525676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K. (2015). Linking leadership to learning: State, district and local effects. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30321. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30321
   Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership project – Investigating the links to improved student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010:800). Skollagen [The Swedish Education Act]. Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Smoley, E. R. (1999). Effective schoolboards: Strategies for improving board performance (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2015:22). Rektorn och styrkedjan. Betänkande av Utredningen om rektorernas arbetssituation inom skolväsendet [The principal and the chain of governance. Report on the working situation for principals in the educational system]. Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1998). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86–109). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Svedberg, L. (2014). Rektorn, skolchefen och resultaten. Mellan profession och politik [Principal, the superintendent and the results. Between profession and policy]. Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). MA Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Törnsén, M., & Ärlestig, H. (2014). Pedagogiskt ledarskap, mål, process och resultat [Pedagogical leadership, aim, process and results]. In J. Höög & O. Johansson (Eds.), Framgångsrika skolor - mer om struktur, kultur och ledarskap [Successful schools – More about structure, culture and leadership] (pp. 77–99). Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., & Ylimäki, R. (2015). Theory of educational leadership, Didaktik and curriculum studies – A non-affirmative and discursive approach ( No 38). In Educational leadership – theory, research and school development. Report from the Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningssed [Good research practice]. Vetenskapsrådet. https://www.vr.se/download/18.2412c5311624176023d25b05/1529480532631/God-forskningssed_VR_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webb Yackee, S. (2015). Invisible (and visible) lobbying: The case of state regulatory policymaking. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2015, 15(3), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440015588148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1982). Administering education in loosely coupled schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 63(10), 673–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802246376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar