Instructional reform and multiple institutional logics: insights from executive leadership in English Multi-Academy Trusts

References

• Ball, S. (2017). The education debate (3rd ed.). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2013). The rationalizing logics of public school reform: How cultural institutions matter for classroom instruction. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812468792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N., & Sherer, D. G. (2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/685847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. (2015). Corporatised leadership in English schools. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511431569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulude, E., & Milley, P. (2020). Institutional complexity and multiple accountability tensions: A conceptual framework for analyzing school leaders’ interpretation of competing demands. Policy Futures in Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320940134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy-Spicer, D., Bubb, S., Earley, P., Crawford, M., & James, C. (2019). Headteacher performance management in England: Balancing internal and external accountability through performance leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehren, M. C. M., Janssens, F. J. G., Brown, M., McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., & Shevlin, P. (2017). Evaluation and decentralised governance: Examples of inspections in polycentric education systems. Journal of Educational Change, 18(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9297-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Maguire, M., Neumann, E., & Towers, E. (2019). What’s wrong with ‘deliverology’? Performance measurement, accountability and quality improvement in English secondary education. Journal of Education Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1706103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glatter, R. (2017). ‘Because we can’: Pluralism and structural reform in education. London Review of Education, 15(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., & Malone, M. (2019). Charter schools in turnaround: Competing institutional logics in the Tennessee achievement school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718795051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greany, T., & Higham, R. (2018). Hierarchy, markets and networks: Analysing the ‘self-improving school-led system’ agenda in England and the implications for schools. UCL IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. (2011). The state and education policy: The academies programme. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H. (2016). Between structure and agency: Contextualizing school leaders’ strategic responses to market pressures. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1086/685850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H., & Creed, B. (2020). Choice, competition, and cognition: How Arizona Charter school leaders interpret and respond to market pressures. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(4), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2020.1800174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jha, H. K., & Beckman, C. M. (2017). A patchwork of identities: Emergence of charter schools as a new organizational form. In M.-D. L. Seidel & H. R. Greve (Eds.), Emergence (Vol. 50, pp. 69–107). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20170000050003
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Allbright, T. N., Bulkley, K. E., Kennedy, K. E., & Dhaliwal, T. K. (2020). Institutional logics in Los Angeles schools: Do multiple models disrupt the grammar of schooling? American Journal of Education, 126(4), 603–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/709516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H. (2012). Bridging accountability obligations, professional values and (perceived) student needs with integrity. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249871
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, E., Towers, E., Gewirtz, S., & Maguire, M. (2016). A curriculum for all? The effects of recent key stage 4 curriculum, assessment, and accountability reforms on English secondary education. National Union of Teachers. http://downloads2.dodsmonitoring.com/downloads/Misc_Files/KingsCollege141116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, N. (2017). The practice of scalecraft: Scale, policy and the politics of the market in England’s academy schools. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 1060–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16687764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peurach, D. J., Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (2019). Governments, markets, and instruction: Considerations for cross-national research. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G. (2016). Principals’ conceptions of instructional leadership and their informal social networks: An exploration of the mechanisms of the Mesolevel. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 433–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/685851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10382877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. (2016). Challenging school reform from below: Is leadership the missing link in mobilization theory? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1071403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S. C., & Duque, M. R. (2015). The best laid plans: An examination of school plan quality and implementation in a school improvement initiative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 259–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2012). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, O. Christine, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T. M., & Woulfin, S. L. (2014). Equity-oriented reform amid standards-based accountability: A qualitative comparative analysis of an intermediary’s instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 253–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214527335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. Teachers College Press in association with Education International.
   Google Scholar
• West, A., & Bailey, E. (2013). The development of the academies programme: ‘Privatising’ school-based education in England 1986–2013. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.789480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, A., & Wolfe, D. (2019). Academies, autonomy, equality and democratic accountability: Reforming the fragmented publicly funded school system in England. London Review of Education, 17(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.1.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. (2017). Rescaling the local: Multi-academy trusts, private monopoly and statecraft in England. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 49(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1284769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S. L. (2016). Duet or duel? A portrait of two logics of reading instruction in an urban school district. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1086/685848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar