Evidence, schmevidence: the abuse of the word “evidence” in policy discourse about education

References

• Arnott, M., & Ozga, J. (2010). Education and nationalism: The discourse of education policy in Scotland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003786951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, T. (2016). The conservative party: From Thatcher to Cameron (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of new labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903486125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. (2006). Teaching of reading to be revised. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4818516.stm
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burks, B. S., Roe, A., & Terman, L. M. (1949). Studies of identical twins reared apart. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 63(5), i–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093608
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, D. (2013). Some thoughts on education and political priorities. https://dominiccummings.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/20130825-some-thoughts-on-education-and-political-priorities-version-2-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2004). Systematic reviews and the Campbell collaboration. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence based practice in education (pp. 21–33). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L., Harnischfeger, A., & Wiley, D. E. (1977). Curricula, personnel resources and grouping strategies. ML-GROUP for Policy Studies in Education, Central Midwestern Regional Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, H., & Boseley, S. (2020, April 23). Scientists criticise UK government's ‘following the science’ claim. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/23/scientists-criticise-uk-government-over-following-the-science
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2017, January 26). Nick Gibb: The evidence in favour of teacher-led instruction. Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nick-gibb-the-evidence-in-favour-of-teacher-led-instruction
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2016). Softly, softly: Genetics, intelligence and the hidden racism of the new geneism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1139189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, P., Clark, M., Tuttle, C. C., & Dwyer, E. (2010). The evaluation of charter school impacts: Final report (NCEE 2010-4029). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. (2013a). Teachers! What would evidence based practice look like? http://www.badscience.net/2013/03/heres-my-paper-on-evidence-and-teaching-for-the-education-minister/#comments
   Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. (2013b). Building evidence into education. Bad Science. http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/b/ben%20goldacre%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1988). Telepathy: Origins of randomization in experimental design. Isis, 79(3), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/354775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., & Watson, J. E. (2003). Accelerating reading and spelling with synthetic phonics: A five year follow up. Insight 4. Scottish Executive. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/03/16513/18923
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (2009). Does intensive reading instruction contribute to reading comprehension? Knowledge Quest, 37(4), 72–74.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (2017, December 7). Don’t read too much into the PIRLS literacy test results: Letters. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/07/ministers-are-reading-too-much-into-this-test
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Macnab, N., & Thomas, G. (2007). Quality in research and the significance of community assessment and peer review: Education’s idiosyncrasy. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701614832
   Google Scholar
• Marmot, M. G. (2004). Evidence based policy or policy-based evidence? BMJ, 328(7445), 906–907. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7445.906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q. (1938). Special review: Newman, Freeman, and Holzinger's twins: A study of heredity and environment. Psychological Bulletin, 35(4), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055700
   Google Scholar
• Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N., & Holzinger, K. J. (1937). Twins: A study of heredity and environment. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J. (1923/1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Statistical Science, 5(4), 465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Oancea, A., & Pring, R. (2008). The importance of being thorough: On systematic accumulations of ‘what works’ in education research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(S1), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, J. (2016). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. DfES. www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/rosereview
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E., & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 13(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). Lasting differences: The high/scope preschool curriculum comparison through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(2), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90009-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. (2016). The housing crisis in neoliberal Britain: Free market think-tanks and the production of ignorance. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 370–382). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. (2018). The invention of the ‘sink estate’: Consequential categorization and the UK housing crisis. In I. Tyler & T. Slater (Eds.), The sociology of stigma (pp. 877–897). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solity, J. (2017, December 7). Don’t read too much into the PIRLS literacy test results: Letters. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/07/ministers-are-reading-too-much-into-this-test
   Google Scholar
• Strassheim, H., & Kettunen, P. (2014). When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X13990433991320
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2012). Changing our landscape of inquiry for a new science of education. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.6t2r089l715x3377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2016). After the gold rush: Questioning the “gold standard” and reappraising the status of experiment and randomized controlled trials in education. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2021). Experiment’s persistent failure in education inquiry, and why it keeps failing. British Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C., Brooks, G., & Hall, J. (2006). A systematic review of the research literature on the use of phonics in the teaching of reading and spelling. Research Report 711. Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Torriti, J. (2010). Impact assessment and the liberalization of the EU energy markets: Evidence-based policy-making or policy-based evidence-making? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S., & Friedenberg, R. V. (2015). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (8th ed.). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergriff, I. (2012). Taking a stance on stance: Metastancing as legitimation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 6(1), 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Weale, S. (2017, December 7). English pupils improve results in international reading exams. Letters. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/05/english-pupils-improve-results-in-international-reading-exams
   Google Scholar
• Worth, J. (2016). Analysis of academy school performance in 2015 (LGA research report). NFER.
   Google Scholar