A Feminist Posthumanist Multispecies Ethnography for Educational Studies

REFERENCES

• Adams, C. (1990/2015). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York, NY: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (1995). Women and animals ( Ed). Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Museum of Natural History. (n.d.). Mass extinction. Retrieved from https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/dinosaurs-ancient-fossils-new-discoveries/extinction/mass-extinction/.
   Google Scholar
• Andrzejewski, J., Pedersen, H., & Wicklund, F. (2009). Interspecies education for humans, animals, and the earth. In J. Andrzejewski, M. P. Baltodano, & L. Symcox ( Eds.), Social Justice, Peace, and Environmental Education (pp. 136–154). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aquarium of the Pacific (2015). 990 Tax Form. Retrieved from http://www.aquariumofpacific.org/downloads/Form_990_Public_Inspection_Copy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., & Russell, C. (2000). Beyond human, beyond words: Anthropocentrism, critical pedagogy, and the poststructuralist turn. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(3), 188–203. doi:10.2307/1585953.
   Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. (2103). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 405–424. doi:10.1017/S1742058X13000283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgrami, A. (2008). Gandhi, Newton, and the Enlightenment. In I. A. Karawan, W. McCormack, & S. E. Reynolds (Eds.), Values and violence: Intangible aspects of tourism. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Birke, L. (2002). Intimate familiarities? Feminism and human-animal studies. Society & Animals, 10(4), 429–436. doi:10.1163/156853002320936917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke, L., Bryld, M., Lykke, N. (2004). Animal performances: An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Blaise, M., Hamm, C., & Iorio, J. M. (2016). Modest witness(ing) and lively stories: Paying attention to matters of concern in early childhood education. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 25(1), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2015). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 378–384. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 137–157. doi:10.1177/0309132514527401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 324–340). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex.” London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carastathis, A. (2014). The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 303–314. doi:10.1111/phc3.12129.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. (2008). Human/nature discourse in environmental science education resources. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 13(1), 107–121
   Google Scholar
• Claiborne, L. (2017). Travels with my father: Animating an imperceptible relationship. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(4), 257–266. doi:10.1177/1077800416686375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collard, R. (2012). Cougar figures, gender, and the performances of predation. Gender, Place, and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 19, 518–540. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2011.610179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corman, L., & Vandrovcová, T. (2014). Radical humility: Toward a more holistic critical animal studies pedagogy. In A. Nocella II, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka ( Eds.), Defining critical animal studies: An introduction to an intersectional social justice approach to animal liberation (pp. 135–157). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–99. doi:10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Crist, E. (2013). On the poverty of our nomenclature. Environmental Humanities, 3, 129–147. doi:10.1215/22011919-3611266.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2006). The “Anthropocene.” In E. Ehlers & T. Krafft ( Eds.), Earth systems science in the Anthropocene (pp. 13–18). The Netherlands: Springer-Verlag Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J., & Steffen, W. (2003). How long have we been in the Anthropocene era? Climatic Change, 61, 251–257. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004708.74871.62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cudworth, E., & Hobden, J. (2015). Liberation for straw dogs? Old materialism, new materialism, and the challenges of an emancipatory posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), 134–148. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.971634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckha, M. (2010). The subhuman as an agent of violence. Journal of Critical Animal Studies, 8(3), 28–51.
   Google Scholar
• Deckha, M. (2012). Toward a postcolonial, posthumanist feminist theory: Centralizing race and culture in feminist work on nonhuman animals. Hypatia, 27(3), 527–545. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01290.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckha, M. (2013). Animal advocacy, feminism, and intersectionality. Deportate, Esuli, Profughe, 23, 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. In M. Mallet & D. Willis (Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press. ( Original work published 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Di, Chiro G. (2006). Teaching urban ecology: Environmental studies and the pedagogy of intersectionality. Feminist Teacher, 16(2), 98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. (1990). Animal rights and feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15(2), 350–375. doi:10.1086/494588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. (2006). Feminism and the treatment of animals: From care to dialogue. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2), 305–329. doi:10.1086/491750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, S. (2017). “Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon.” Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 91–110. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1101752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2013). Researching differently: Generating a gender agenda for research in environmental education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals ( Eds.), The international handbook for research on environmental education (pp. 375–383). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time, and perversion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics and art. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. M. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, W., & Nelson, I. (2015). Practising feminist political ecologies. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, A. B. (2012). Going beyond the normative white “post-racial” vegan epistemology. In P. Williams-Forson & C. Counihan ( Eds.), Taking food public: Redefining foodways in a changing world (pp. 155–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, E. (2010). FINGEREYES: Impression of cup corals. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 577–599. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01070.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. (2015). The Gender, Place, and Culture Jan Monk Distinguished Annual Lecture: Feminism and animals: Exploring interspecies relations through intersectionality, performativity, and standpoint. Gender, Place and Culture, 22(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2014.993546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, H. (1861). Incidents in the life of a slave girls: Written by herself. Boston. Retrieved from http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/jacobs/menu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, R. V., & Humes, B. (2009). Marching out from Ultima Thule: Critical counterstories of emancipatory educators working at the intersection of human rights, animal rights, and planetary sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. J. (2015). Dangerous crossings: Race, species, and nature in a multicultural age. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–476. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbert, E. (2014). The sixth extinction: An unnatural history. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. (2017). Beyond multispecies ethnography: Engaging with violence and animal rights in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 37(3), 333–357. doi:10.1177/0308275X17723973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, G. (2011). Representing animal-others in educational research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 106–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St., Pierre, E. A., & (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H. (2007). Ecofeminism as a pedagogical project: Women, nature, and education. Educational Theory, 57(3), 351–368. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00262.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2014). They call them ‘good-luck polka dots’: Disciplining bodies, bird biopower, and human-animal relationships at the Aquarium of the Pacific. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015a). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 6, 128–148. doi:10.3167/ares.2015.060108.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015b). “Culture as ability”: Organizing enabling educative spaces for humans and animals. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 20, 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017a). A feminist posthumanist political ecology of education for theorizing human-animal relations/relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 111–130. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1135419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017b). When ‘Angelino’ squirrels don't eat nuts: A feminist posthumanist politics of consumption across southern California. Gender, Place, & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 24(6), 774–793. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018). An ecofeminist account of cyberbullying: Implications for environmental and social justice scholar-educator-activists. The Journal of Environmental Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00958964.2017.1400513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (in press). A feminist posthumanist ecopedagogy in/for/with animalscapes. Special issue of the Journal of Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T., & Russell, C. (2017). Learning science in aquariums and on whalewatching boats: The political deployment of other animals. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Animals in science education: Ethics, curriculum, and pedagogy (pp. 41–50). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2005). Situating bodies. In L. Nelson & J. Seager ( Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 337–349). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J., & Srinivasan, K. (2013). Animal geographies. In N. C. Johnson, R. H. Schein, & J. Winders ( Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Cultural Geography (pp. 332–342). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L., & Jackson, A. Y. (2016). Voice in the agentic assemblage. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 29(11), 1090–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture “as” disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaigne, M. (1993). Michel de Montaigne: The complete essays. In M. A. Screech (Ed. & Trans.), London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Nxumalo, F., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). ‘Staying with the trouble’ in child-insect-educator common worlds. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1414–1426. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1325447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. (2009). Under the knife: Animal dissection as a contested school science activity. Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education, 1(2), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 4, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare centre. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168. doi:10.1215/22011919-3616380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Taylor, A. (2015). Unsettling pedagogies through common world encounters: Grappling with (post)colonial legacies in Canadian forests and Australian Bushlands.” In V. Pacini-Ketchabaw & A. Taylor ( Eds.), Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education (pp. 43–62). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentering the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes ( Eds.), Posthuman research practices (pp. 149–167). Houndmills: Basingstoke & Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2012). Unstable mixtures: Zooethnographic educational relations as difference, contagion, critique, and potential. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 1(1), 152–165.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2013). Follow the Judas sheep. Materializing post qualitative methodology in the zooethnographic space. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 717–731.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2015). Parasitic pedagogies and materialities of affect in veterinary education. Emotion, Space, and Society, 14, 50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Pini, B. (2016). Educational epistemologies and methods in a more-than-human world. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1051–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Stănescu, V. (2012). Series editors' introduction: What is “critical” about animal studies? From the animal “question” to the animal “condition.” In K. Socha (Ed.), Women, destruction, and the avant-garde: A paradigm for animal liberation (pp. ix–xi). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C. (1998). Animals, geography, and the city: Notes on inclusions and exclusions. In J. Wolch & J. Emel ( Eds.), Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands (pp. 51–71). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (1993). The politics of reason: Towards a feminist logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(4), 436–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, T. (1983/2004). The case for animal rights. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: Regents of the University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. L. (2005). ‘Whoever does not write is written’: The role of ‘nature’ in post-post approaches to environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(4), 433–443. doi:10.1080/13504620500169569.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. L., & Hodson, D. (2002). Whale watching as critical science education? Canadian Journal of Science and Technology Education, 2(4), 485–504. doi:10.1080/14926150209556537.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. L., & Semenko, K. (2016). We take “cow” and compliment: Fattenting humane, environmental, and social justice education. In E. Cameron & C. Russell ( Eds.), The fat pedagogy reader: Challenging weight-based oppression through critical pedagogy (pp. 211–220). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, T. (2017, July 11). Era of “biological annihilation” underway, scientists warn. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/climate/mass-extinction-animal-species.html?mcubz = 0
   Google Scholar
• Shava, S. (2013). The representation of Indigenous knowledges. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals ( Eds.), The international handbook for research on environmental education. (pp. 384–393). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1975/2009). Animal liberation. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Snaza, N. (2015). Toward a genealogy of educational humanism. In N. Snaza & J. A. Weaver ( Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research. (pp. 17–29). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponsel, L., E., Headland, T. N., & Bailey, R. B. (Eds.). (1996). Tropical deforestation: The human dimension. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. M. (1830). Religion and the pure principles of morality. Retrieved from http://cedrickmay.com/mstewart/?page_id=65.(CCBY-SA3.0)
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, B. (2014). Ghost stories for Darwin: The science of variation and the politics of diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Toward a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 23(4), 507–529. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2016). Kids, raccoons, and roos: Awkward encounters and mixed affects. Children's Geographies, 15(2), 131–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2014a). An introduction to eco-ability: The struggle for justice, with a focus on humans with disabilities and nonhuman animals. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 12(2), 95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2014b). Interdependent animals. A feminist disability ethic-of-care. In C. J. Adams & L. Gruen ( Eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals and the earth. (pp. 109–126). New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2017). Beasts of burden: Animal and disability liberation. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist's take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29, 4–22. doi:10.1111/johs.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. D. (2011). Production of environmental knowledge: Scientist, complex natures, and the question of agency. In M. J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, & M. D. Turner ( Eds.), Knowing nature. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twine, R. (2010). Intersectional disgust? Animals and (eco)feminism. Feminism & Psychology, 20(3), 397–406. doi:10.1177/0959353510368284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, T. (2010). Interspecies etiquette: An ethics of paying attention to animals. Ethics and the Environment, 15(1), 101–121. doi:10.2979/ete.2010.15.1.101.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. C. (2016). On multispecies mythology: A critique of animal anthropology. Theory, Culture, & Society, 33(5), 159–172. doi:10.1177/0263276416637128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. A., & Snaza, N. (2016). Against methodocentrism in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1055–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock, J., & Krehbiel, M. (2009). Fat youth as commont targets for bullying. In E. D. Rothblum & S. Solovay ( Eds.), The fat studies reader (pp. 120–126). New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Z. (2009). The broken promises of monsters: Haraway, animals, and the humanist legacy. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 7(2), 22–62.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600–609. doi:10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. (2013). And say the cat responded? Getting closer to the feline gaze. Society and Animals, 21, 93–104. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring, G. (2008). The politics of ableism. Development, 51(2), 252–258.
   Google Scholar