Deaf Epistemology, Sign Language and the Education of d/Deaf Children

References

• Abu-Saad, I., & Champagne, D. (Eds.). (2006). Indigenous education and empowerment: International perspectives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Adolf, M., & Stehr, N. (2014). Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aiello, A., & Aiello, M. (2001). Cochlear implants and deaf identity. In L. Bragg (Ed.), Deaf world: A historical reader and primary sourcebook (pp. 406–412). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1995). Feminist epistemology: An interpretation and a defense. Hypatia, 10(3), 50–84. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x
   Google Scholar
• Audi, R. (2011). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bahan, B. (2008). Upon the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In H.-D. Bauman (Ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking (pp. 83–99). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A., van den Bogaerde, B., Pfau, R., & Schermer, T. (Eds.). (2016). The linguistics of sign languages: An introduction. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2010). Sign language and the deaf community. In J. Fishman & O. García (Eds.), Handbook of language and ethnic identity (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., pp. 153–171). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnum, M. (1984). In support of bilingual/bicultural education for deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 129(5), 404–408. doi:10.1353/aad.2012.0945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, H.-D. (2004). Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9(2), 239–246. doi:10.1093/deafed/enh025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauman, H.-D. (2008). Introduction: Listening to deaf studies. In H.-D. Bauman (Ed.), Open your eyes: Deaf studies talking (pp. 1–32). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynton, D. (1996). Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynton, D. (2002). The curious death of sign language studies in the nineteenth century. In D. Armstrong, M. Karchmer, & J. Van Cleve (Eds.), The study of signed languages: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 13–34). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582. doi:10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, L. (Ed.). (2001). DEAF-WORLD: A historical reader and primary sourcebook. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, J., & Miller, D. (1993). Sign language, the deaf and the epistemic violence of mainstreaming. Language and Education, 7(1), 21–41. doi:10.1080/09500789309541346
   Google Scholar
• Brentari, D. (Ed.). (2010). Sign languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calderon, R., & Greenberg, M. (2003). Social and emotional development of deaf children. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language and education (pp. 177–189). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, M. (2006). Transdisciplinary research and Aboriginal knowledge. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 35, 78–89. doi:10.1017/S1326011100004191
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Education of the Deaf. (1988). Toward equality. A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, D. (1978). Political and moral contexts that produced P.L. 94-142. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(6), 10–14. doi:10.1177/002248717802900604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cue, K., Pudans-Smith, K., Wolsey, J.-L., Wright, S., & Clark, M. (2019). The odyssey of deaf epistemology: A search for meaning-making. American Annals of the Deaf, 164(3), 395–422. doi:10.1353/aad.2019.0017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darder, A., Torres, R., & Baltodano, M. (2009). The critical pedagogy reader. New York, NY: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• De Clerck, G. (2011). Fostering deaf people’s empowerment: The Cameroonian deaf community and epistemological equity. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1419–1435. doi:10.1080/01436597.2011.604516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clerck, G. (2012). Contributing to an era of epistemological equity: A critique and an alternative to the practice of science. In P. Paul & D. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 19–44). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Clerck, G. (2016). Deaf epistemologies, identity and learning: A comparative perspective. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLana, M., Gentry, M., & Andrews, J. (2007). The efficacy of ASL/English bilingual education: Considering public schools. American Annals of the Deaf, 152(1), 73–87. doi:10.1353/aad.2007.0010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. (2005). Critical race ethnography in education: Narrative, inequality and the problem of epistemology. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, R., & Rowley, A. (2013). Audism: A theory and practice of audiocentric privilege. Humanity & Society, 37(2), 101–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fink-Eitel, H. (1988). Foucault zur einführung. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag GmbH (Hamburg).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archeaology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Vintage. (Original publication in French 1966)
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972a). The archaeology of knowledge and the Discourse on language. New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original publication in French 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972b). Naissance de la clinique: Une archéologie du regard médical (2nd ed. rev.). Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris, France: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la sexulité I: La volonté de savoir. Paris, France: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984a). Histoire de la sexulité II: L’usage des plaisirs. Paris, France: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984b). Histoire de la sexulité III: Le souci de soi. Paris, France: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994a). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994b). Power. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2006). History of madness. London, UK: Routledge. (Original publication in French 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Friedner, M. (2016). UNDERSTANDING and NOT-UNDERSTANDING: What do epistemologies and ontologies do in Deaf worlds? Sign Language Studies, 16(2), 184–203. doi:10.1353/sls.2016.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumerton, R. (2006). Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García, R. (2013). De los sistemas orgánicos a los sistemas simbólicos. La cultura y la articulación de lo real Apuntes para una etnoepistemología desde Wittgenstein. Revista de Filosofía, 74(2), 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gélinas, C., & Bouchard, Y. (2014). An epistemological framework for indigenous knowledge. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, 4, 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, J., & Easterbrooks, S. (1997). Educating children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Residential life, ASL, and deaf culture. (ERIC Digest #558). Education Resources Information Center, ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger, N., Tarule, J., Clinchy, B., & Belenky, M. (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women's ways of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J., & Levinson, S. (1991). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 32(5), 613–623. doi:10.1086/204009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, P. C., O’Hearn, A., McKee, M., Steider, A., & Thew, D. (2010). Deaf epistemology: Deafhood and deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 486–492. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmeister, R. (2008). Language and the deaf world: Difference not disability. In M. Brisk (Ed.), Language, culture, and community in teacher education (pp. 71–98). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. (2010). Deaf epistemology: The deaf way of knowing. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 471–478. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, T. (2013). Introduction to American deaf culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, M. (1992). Untruths in advertising: Cochlear implants. In M. Garretson (Ed.), Viewpoints on deafness: A Deaf American monograph (Vol. 42, pp. 67–68). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, K. (1997). Deaf empowerment: Emergence, struggle, and rhetoric. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen, J., De Clerck, G., Lutalo-Kiingi, S. & McGregor, W. (Eds.). (2015). Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., Liddell, S., & Erting, C. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education (Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T., & Schembri, A. (2007). Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen, M. (2016). Inclusive education: A sustainable approach? In G. De Clerck & P. Paul (Eds.), Sign language sustainable development and equal opportunities: Envisioning the future for deaf students (pp. 105–117). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2002). Deafness as culture: A psychological perspective. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 51–60. doi:10.18061/dsq.v22i2.344
   Google Scholar
• Kanpol, B. (1999). Critical pedagogy: An introduction (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, B. (2007). Celebrating PL 94-142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Issues in Teacher Education, 16(2), 65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. (2008). Critical pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Klausen, S. (2015). Group knowledge: A real-world approach. Synthese, 192(3), 813–839. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0589-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komesaroff, L. (2008). Disabling pedagogy: Power, politics and deaf education. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusters, A., De Meulder, M., & O’Brien, D. (Eds.). (2017). Innovations in deaf studies: The role of deaf scholars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. (2005). Deafhood: A concept stressing possibilities, not deficits. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33(66-suppl), 12–17. doi:10.1080/14034950510033318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H. (1992). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H. (1993a). Cochlear implants: Their cultural and historical meaning. In J. van Cleve (Ed.), Deaf history unveiled: Interpretations from the new scholarship (pp. 272–291). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H, (1993b). The medicalization of cultural deafness in historical perspective. In R. Fischer & H. Lane (Eds.), Looking back: A reader on the history of deaf communities and their sign languages (pp. 479–493). Hamburg, Germany: Signum.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H. (1999). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community (new ed.). San Diego, CA: DawnSign Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H. (2002). Do deaf people have a disability? Sign Language Studies, 2(4), 356–379. doi:10.1353/sls.2002.0019
   Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Hoffmeister, R., & Bahan, B. (1996). A journey into the DEAF-WORLD. San Diego, CA: DawnSign Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I. (2009). A lens on deaf identities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I., Andrews, J., & Harris, R. (2018). Deaf culture: Exploring Deaf communities in the United States. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, K., & Whitford, M. (Eds.). (1994). Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lillo-Martin, D. (1991). Universal grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K., DeLuca, D., & Napoli, D. (Eds.). (2008). Signs and voices: Deaf culture, identity, language, and arts. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (Ed.). (1990). Sign language research: Theoretical issues. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (Ed.). (1995). Sociolinguistics in deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C., Bayley, R., & Valli, C. (2001). Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. (1992). Language diversity and thought: A reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. (1996). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maffie, J. (2013). Ethno-epistemology. In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 277–279). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., Tang, G., & Knoors, H. (Eds.). (2014). Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (6th ed.). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.). (2007). Critical pedagogy: Where are we now? New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, R., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (Eds.). (2004). Modality and structure in signed and spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2007). A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. (2010). Epistemology and people who are deaf: Deaf worldviews, views of the Deaf World, or my parents are hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 479–485. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizumoto, M., Ganeri, J., & Goddard, C. (Eds.). (2020). Ethnoepistemology: New directions for global epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mizumoto, M., Stick, S., & McCready, E. (Eds.). (2018). Epistemology for the rest of the world (EFRW). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, D. (2009). Residential schools for the deaf and academic placement past, present, and future. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(1), 3–4. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, D. (2010). Epistemologies, deafness, learning, and teaching. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 447–455. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, D., & Paul, P. (2010). Summary and prologue: Perspectives on deaf epistemologies. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 493–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moores, D., & Paul, P. (2012). Retrospectus and prospectus. In P. Paul & D. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 255–258). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nover, S. (1993). Our voices, our vision: Politics of deaf education. Paper presented at the CAIS/CEASD Convention in Baltimore, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Nover, S. (2000). History of language planning in deaf education: The 19th century (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Ogbu, J. (Ed.). (2008). Minority status, oppositional cultural, and schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (2005). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, P., & Moores, D. (2010). Perspectives on deaf epistemologies. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 417–420. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, P., & Moores, D. (Eds.). (2012a). Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, P., & Moores, D. F. (2012b). Toward an understanding of epistemology and deafness. In P. Paul & D. Moores (Eds.), Deaf epistemologies: Multiple perspectives on the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 3–15). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., & Hittie, M. (2003). Inclusive teaching: Creating effective schools for all learners. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of sign language linguistics. Berlin, Germany: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, S. (2002). From concepts to practice in deaf education: A United Kingdom perspective on inclusion. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(3), 230–243. doi:10.1093/deafed/7.3.230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pritchard, D. (2013). Epistemic virtue and the epistemology of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 236–247. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (1985). The deaf as a linguistic minority: Educational considerations. Harvard Educational Review, 55(3), 265–277. doi:10.17763/haer.55.3.a333575p1l4p2156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (1989). Nineteenth century conceptions of deafness: Implications for contemporary educational practice. Educational Theory, 39(1), 39–46. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1989.00039.x
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (2002). Toward an ‘archeology of deafness’: Etic and emic constructions of identity in conflict. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1(1), 41–66. doi:10.1207/S15327701JLIE0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Reagan, T. (2010). Language policy and planning for sign languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar Pérez, M., & Saavedra, C. (2017). A call for onto-epistemological diversity in early childhood education and care: Centering global south conceptualizations of childhood/s. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 1–29. doi:10.3102/0091732X16688621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, A., & Lucas, C. (Eds.). (2015). Sociolinguistics and deaf communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E., & Delaporte, Y. (2015). A historical and etymological dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2008). Bilingual education and sign language as the mother tongue of deaf children. In C. Bidoli & E. Ochese (Eds.), English in international deaf communication (pp. 75–96). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, J. (2011). Critical pedagogy for social justice. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, L. (2016). Audism and racism: The hidden curriculum impacting Black d/Deaf college students in the classroom. Negro Educational Review, 67(1–4), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Steup, M., Turri, J., & Sosa, E. (Eds.). (2014). Contemporary debates in epistemology (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. (1993). Sign language structure. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press. (Original publication 1960)
   Google Scholar
• Strong, M. (1988). A bilingual approach to the education of young deaf children: ASL and English. In M. Strong (Ed.), Language learning and deafness (pp. 113–129). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supalla, T., & Clark, P. (2015). Sign language archeology: Understanding the historical roots of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1998). The linguistics of British Sign Language: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, R., & Gregory, S. (2007). Sign bilingual education: Policy and practice. Coleford, Gloucestershire, UK: Douglas McLean.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, J. (2011). Cyborgization: Deaf education for young children in the cochlear implantation era. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(7), 639–652. doi:10.1177/1077800411414006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valli, C., Lucas, C., Mulrooney, J., & Villanueva, M. (2011). Linguistics of American Sign Language (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Reynolds, M., & Walberg, H. (1986). Rethinking special education. Educational Leadership, 44(1), 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2010). Without boundaries: An inquiry into deaf epistemologies through a metaparadigm. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(5), 428–434. doi:10.1353/aad.0.0119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, L. (2016). The epistemology of education. Philosophy Compass, 11(3), 146–159. doi:10.1111/phc3.12316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbur, R. (2011). Modality and the structure of language: Sign languages vs. signed systems. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf studies: Language and education (2nd ed., pp. 350–366). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Shaffer, B. (2006). Modality in American sign language. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The expression of modality (pp. 207–237). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wink, J. (2000). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, K. (2001). Cochlear implants vs. deaf culture? In L. Bragg (Ed.), DEAF-WORLD: A historical reader and primary sourcebook (pp. 325–332). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., & Temple, B. (2014). Approaches to social research: The case of Deaf Studies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zambrano, I., & Greenfield, P. (2004). Ethnoepistemologies at home and school. In R. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Culture and competence: Contexts of life success (pp. 251–272). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar