https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6260-6097
References
- Aksoyalp, Y., & Toprak, T. E. (2015). Incorporating pragmatic in English language teaching: To what extent do EFL course books address speech acts? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.125
- Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics?. In K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge University Press.
- Gholami, J. (2015). Is there room for pragmatic knowledge in english books in iranian high schools? English Language Teaching, 8(4), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p39
- Grossi, V. (2009). Teaching pragmatic competence: compliments and compliment responses in the ESL classroom. Prospect, 24(2), 53–62.
- Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/
- Olshtain, E., & Bllum-Kulka, S. (1985). Degree of approximation non-native reactions to native speech act behavior. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 303–325). Newbury House.
- Pérez-Hernández, L. (2019). From research to the textbook: Assessing speech acts representation in course book series for students of English as an L2. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 248–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.17024.per
- Poythress, V. S. (2008). Canon and speech act: Limitations in speech-act theory, with implications for a putative theory of canonical speech acts. Westminster Theological Journal, 70, 337–354.