Comparing the acetolysed and hydrated methods for the pollen analysis of honey

References

• Armbruster L, Jacobs J. 1934–1935. Pollenformen und Honigherkunft-Bestimmung. Berlin-Zehlendorf: Verlag des Archivs für Bienenkunde.
   Google Scholar
• Bänsch S, Tscharntke T, Wünschiers R, Netter L, Brenig B, Gabriel D, Westphal C. 2020. Using ITS2 metabarcoding and microscopy to analyse shifts in pollen diets of honey bees and bumble bees along a mass-flowering crop gradient. Molecular Ecology 29: 5003–5018. doi:10.1111/mec.15675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastl K, Berger U, Kmenta M, Weber M. 2017. Is there an advantage to staying indoors for pollen allergy sufferers? Composition and quantitative aspects of the indoor pollen spectrum. Building and Environment 123: 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckh G, Camps G. 2009. New specifications for unifloral honey. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau 105: 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bell KL, de Vere N, Keller A, Richardson RT, Gous A, Burgess KS, Brosi BJ. 2016. Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects. Genome 59: 629–640. doi:10.1139/gen-2015-0200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beug HJ. 2004. Leitfaden der Pollenbestimmung für Mitteleuropa und angrenzende Gebiete. Pfeil, München.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava HR, Jyothi JVA, Bhushanam M, Surendra NS. 2009. Pollen analysis of Apis honey, Karnataka, India. Apiacta 44: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier M, Davis BAS, Heiri O, Seppä H, Chase BM, Gajewski K, Lacourse T, Telford RJ, Finsinger W, Guiot J, Kühl N, Maezumi SY, Tipton JR, Carter VA, Brussel T, Phelps LN, Dawson A, Zanon M, Vallé F, Nolan C, Mauri A, de Vernal A, Izumi K, Holmström L, Marsicek J, Goring S, Sommer PS, Chaput M, Kupriyanov D. 2020. Pollen-based climate reconstruction techniques for late Quaternary studies. Earth-Science Reviews 210: 103384. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung). 2002. Untersuchung von Honig - Bestimmung der relative Pollenhäufigkeit, DIN 10760: 2002-05, Berlin, http://www.din.de, http://www.beuth.de.
   Google Scholar
• Durán-Escalante KC, Ortiz-Díaz JJ, Pinzón-Esquivel JP, Gálvez-Mariscal MA, Alfaro-Bates RG. 2023. Palynological characterisation of palm honey (Sabal yapa) produced in Yucatan (Mexico). Grana 62: 133–145. doi:10.1080/00173134.2023.2178264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durugbo EU, Daramola GG, Abazuh DU, Odim MMO. 2020. Pollen characterization and physicochemical analysis of six Nigerian honey samples; test for authenticity. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology 8: 1863–1870. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v8i9.1863-1870.3477.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1943. An introduction to pollen analysis. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica Company.
   Google Scholar
• Erdtman G. 1960. The acetolysis method – a revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Faegri K, Iversen J. 1975. Textbook of pollen analysis. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Gadbin C. 1979. L’intérêt de l’acétolyse en mélissopalynologie. Apidologie 10: 23–28. doi:10.1051/apido:19790103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galán C, Smith M, Thibaudon M, Frenguelli G, Oteros J, Gehrig R, Berger U, Clot B, Brandao R, EAS QC Woroking Group. 2014. Pollen monitoring: Minimum requirements and reproducibility of analysis. Aerobiologia 30: 385–395. doi:10.1007/s10453-014-9335-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier C, Bouchal JM, Ulrich S, Uhl D, Wappler T, Wedmann S, Zetter R, Grímsson F. 2023. Collecting in situ/adhered pollen from fossil compressed angiosperm flowers. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 310: 104831. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2022.104831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grímsson F, Bouchal JM, Xafis A, Zetter R. 2020. Combined LM and SEM study of the middle Miocene (Sarmatian) palynoflora from the Lavanttal Basin, Austria: Part V. Magnoliophyta 3 – Myrtales to Ericales. Grana 59: 127–193. doi:10.1080/00173134.2019.1696400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbritter H, Ulrich S, Grimsson F, Weber M, Zetter R, Hesse M, Buchner R, Svojtka M, Frosch-Radivo A. 2018. Illustrated pollen terminology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse M. 1981. The fine structure of the exine in relation to the stickiness of angiosperm pollen. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 35: 81–92. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(81)90015-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse M, Waha M. 1989. A new look at the acetolysis method. Plant Systematics and Evolution 163: 147–152. doi:10.1007/BF00936510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby S, Benn J, Vinkenoog R, Goldberg S, Pound MJ. 2022. Methods in melissopalynology: colour determination of pollen pellets for colour vision deficient individuals. Palynology 46: 1–7. doi:10.1080/01916122.2022.2062476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikegbunam NC, Nweze NO, Walter OJ, Njokuocha RC, Agwu COC. 2022. Melissopalynological characterization of honey samples from southeastern, Nigeria. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 10: 203–210. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v10i2.203-210.4537.
   Google Scholar
• Koelzer K, Weber M, Ulrich S. 2023. Integration of the pollen database PONET into PalDat with new features for light microscopy. Grana 62: 221–227. doi:10.1080/00173134.2023.2256328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontidou K, Vokou D, Sandionigi A, Bruno A, Lazarina M, De Groeve J, Li M, Varotto C, Girardi M, Casiraghi M, Cristofori A. 2021. Plant biodiversity assessment through pollen DNA metabarcoding in Natura 2000 habitats (Italian Alps). Scientific Reports 11: 18226. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97619-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieux MEH. 1969. A palynological investigation of Louisiana honeys. PhD Thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Lieux MEH. 1980. Acetolysis applied to microscopical honey analysis. Grana 19: 57–61. doi:10.1080/00173138009424988.
   Google Scholar
• Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G. 1970. Internationale Kommission für Bienenbotanik: Methodik der Melissopalynologie. Apidologie 1: 193–209. doi:10.1051/apido:19700205.
   Google Scholar
• Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G. 1978. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59: 139–157. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurizio A. 1975. Microscopy of honey. In: Crane E, ed. Honey: A comprehensive survey, 240–257. London: Heinemann, in cooperation with the International Bee Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Meudt HM. 2016. Pollen morphology and its taxonomic utility in the Southern Hemisphere bracteate-prostrate forget-me-nots (Myosotis, Boraginaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany 54: 475–497. doi:10.1080/0028825X.2016.1229343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mildenhall DC, Wiltshire PEJ, Bryant VM. 2006. Forensic palynology: Why do it and how it works. Forensic Science International 163: 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulisch M, Welsch U., eds. 2015. Romeis – Mikroskopische Technik. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Noël G, Mestrez A, Lejeune P, Francis F, Kawai J, Miwa M, Uehara K, Nagase A. 2023. Pollen meta-barcoding reveals different community structures of foraged plants by honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) along space-time gradient in Japan. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 79: 127794. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteros J, Galán C, Alcázar P, Domínguez-Vilches E. 2013. Quality control in bio-monitoring networks. Spanish aerobiology network. Science of The Total Environment 443: 559–565. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PalDat – a palynological database. 2000 onwards. http://www.paldat.org; accessed 31 October 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Polling M, Melati S, de Weger LA, Speksnijder AGCL, Koenders MJF, de Boer H, Gravendeel B. 2022. DNA metabarcoding using nrITS2 provides highly qualitative and quantitative results for airborne pollen monitoring. Science of the Total Environment 806: 150468. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponnuchamy R, Bonhomme V, Prasad S, Das L, Patel P. 2014. Honey pollen: Using melissopalynology to understand foraging preferences of bees. Tropical South India. PLoS One 9(7): e101618. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramalho M, Kleinert-Giovannini A. 1986. Some aspects of the utilization of pollen analysis in ecological research. Apidologie 17: 159–174. doi:10.1051/apido:19860207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reille M. 1992. Pollen et spores d'europe et d'afrique du nord. Marseille: Laboratoire de Botanique historique et Palynologie.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer R. 1988. Honey identification. Cardiff: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart MD, Cornman RD, Iwanowicz DD, McDermott-Kubeczko M, Pettis JS, Spivak MS, Otto CRV. 2017. A comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and ITS metabarcoding. Environmental Entomology 46: 38–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodl B. 2013. Palynologische Untersuchungen an ausgewählten Textilien aus forensischer Sicht. Diploma Thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Stebler T. 2023. Pollen Atlas. Pollen-Wiki. https://pollen.tstebler.ch/MediaWiki/index.php?title=Pollenatlas; accessed 31 October 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Straka H. 1975. Pollen- und Sporenkunde. Eine Einführung in die Palynologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson SJ, Gemeinholzer B. 2021. Testing the effect of pollen exine rupture on metabarcoding with Illumina sequencing. PLoS One 16(2): e0245611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich S, Grímsson F. 2019. The single-grain method: adding TEM to the equation. Grana 59: 44–57. doi:10.1080/00173134.2019.1666915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Ohe W, Persano Oddo L, Piana ML, Morlot M, Martin P. 2004. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie 35: 18–25. doi:10.1051/apido:2004050.
   Google Scholar
• Vorwohl G. 1995. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der mikroskopischen Honiguntersuchung. Bienenvater 116: 276–283.
   Google Scholar
• Weber M, Ulrich S. 2016. Forensic palynology: How pollen in dry grass can link to a crime scene. In: Kars H, van den Eikel L, eds. Soil in criminal and environmental forensics, 15–23. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar