References

• Appel, P. R. (1992). Performance enhancement in physical medicine and rehabilitation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 35(1), 11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagiella, E., Sloan, R. P., & Heitjan, D. F. (2000). Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 37, 13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, K. B., & Kutas, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology, 34, 74–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabasz, A. F. (1980). Effects of hypnosis and perceptual deprivation on vigilance in a simulated radar target-detection task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50(1), 19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1965). Experimental analyses of” hypnotic” behavior: A review of recent empirical findings. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrios, A. A. (2001). A theory of hypnosis based on principles of conditioning and inhibition. Contemporary Hypnosis, 18(4), 163–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. R. (2009). package version 0.999375-39. The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN): The Institute of Statistics and Mathematics of the Wirtshaftsuniversität Wien (WU); lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes.
   Google Scholar
• Behbahani, S., & Nasrabadi, A. M. (2013). The relation of susceptibility levels of hypnosis and different mental tasks. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 9(4), 903–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5. 4.08, retrieved 19 April 2015 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C., Mazzoni, G., Kirsch, I., Meo, M., & Santandrea, M. (2008). The effect of posthypnotic suggestion, hypnotic suggestibility, and goal intentions on adherence to medical instructions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56, 143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casale, A. D., Ferracuti, S., Rapinesi, C., Serata, D., Sani, G., Savoja, V., Kotzalidis, G. D., Tatarelli, R., & Girardi, P. (2012). Neurocognition under hypnosis: findings from recent functional neuroimaging studies. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 286–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, B. J., Thomas, K. M., Welsh, T. F., Badgaiyan, R. D., Eccard, C. H., Jennings, J. R., Crone, E. A. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 8728–8733.
   Google Scholar
• Casiglia, E., Schiff S., Facco, E., Gabbana, A., Tikhonoff, V., Schiavon, L., Bascelli, A., Avdia, M., Tosello, M. T., Rossi, A. M., & Nasto, H. H. (2010). Neurophysiological correlates of post-hypnotic alexia: A controlled study with Stroop test. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52(3),219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Kadosh, R. C., Henik, A., Catena, A., Walsh, V., & Fuentes, L. J. (2009). Induced cross-modal synaesthetic experience without abnormal neuronal connections. Psychological Science, 20(2), 258–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltrozzo, J., & Conway, C. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: What do event-related potentials tell us? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltrozzo, J., Emerson, S. N., Deocampo, J., Singh, S., Freggens, M., Branum-Martin, L., & Conway, C. M. (2017). Visual statistical learning is related to natural language ability in adults: An ERP Study. Brain and Language, 166, 40-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Reseach, 1158, 81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déry, C., Campbell, N. K., Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2014). Suggestion overrides automatic audiovisual integration. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien, J., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2005). Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In T. C. Handy (Eds), Event-related potentials. A methods handbook (pp. 57–82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, 0L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Egner, T., Jamieson, G., & Gruzelier, J. (2005). Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Neuroimage, 27, 969–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T., & Raz, A. (2007). Cognitive control processes and hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and Conscious States: The Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective (pp. 29–50). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., & Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 970–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G, Barabasz, A, Council, J, & Spiegel, D. (2015). advancing research and practice: the revised apa division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Hypnosis, 63(1), 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2014.961870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdinand, N. K., Mecklinger, A., & Kray, J. (2008). Error and deviance processing in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 629–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 336–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladfelter, J. H., & Crasilneck, H. B. (1960). The effects of post-hypnotically induced emotional states on vocabulary skills. Journal of General Psychology, 62, 269–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzelier, J. H. (1996). The state of hypnosis: evidence and applications. QJM-Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 89(4), 313–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruzelier, J. H. (2006). Frontal functions, connectivity and neural efficiency underpinning hypnosis and hypnotic susceptibility. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23, 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, E. F. (1954). Post-hypnotic suggestion and test performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2, 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Hinterberger, T., Schoner, J., & Halsband, U. (2011). Analysis of electrophysiological state patterns and changes during hypnosis induction. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59, 165–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117, 759–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iani, C., Ricci, F., Baroni, G., & Rubichi, S. (2009). Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 856–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iani, C., Ricci, F., Gherri, E., & Rubichi, S. (2006). Hypnotic Suggestion Modulates Cognitive Conflict The Case of the Flanker Compatibility Effect. Psychological Science, 17(8), 721–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S. B., & Salzberg, H. C. (1987). The effects of posthypnotic performance-enhancing instructions on cognitive-motor performance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., & Spanos, N. P. (1982). Suggestions for altered auditory sensitivity, the negative subject effect, and hypnotic susceptibility: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 637–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, E., Conway, C. M., Purdy, J. D., Walk, A. M., & Hendricks, M. A. (2015). Exploring the eurodevelopment of visual statistical learning using event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1597, 95–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Barker, R., Haenschel. C., Baldeweg, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (1997). Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: a test of the frontal hypothesis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 27, 215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (1985). Hypnosis. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 385–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83,:B35–B42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh, L., Vlach, H. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Statistical learning across development: Flexible yet constrained. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, S., & Kotchoubey, B. (2000). Learning effects on event-related brain potentials. Neuroreport, 11, 3327–3331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureys, S., Maquet, P., & Faymonville, M. E. (2004). Brain function in hypnosis. In K. Audenaert, A. Otte, R. A. Dierckx, K. van Heeringen (Eds.), Nuclear Medicine in Psychiatry (pp. 507–519). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., Spiegel, D., Kim, S. B., Lee, J. H., Kim, S. I., Yang, B. H., Choi, J.-H., Kho, Y.-C., & Nam, J. H. (2007). Fractal analysis of EEG in hypnosis and its relationship with hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 14–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lifshitz, M., Bonn, N. A., Fischer, A., Kashem, I. F., & Raz, A. (2013). Using suggestion to modulate automatic processes: from Stroop to McGurk and beyond. Cortex, 49(2), 463–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R., Rhue, J. W., & Snodgrass, M. (1985). Hypnotic susceptibility, involuntariness, and oppositional responding. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio Univeisity, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moratti, S., Clementz, B. A., Gao, Y., Ortiz, T., & Keil, A. (2007). Neural mechanisms of evoked oscillations: Stability and interaction with transient events. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1318–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, D., Janacsek, K., Polner, B., & Kovacs, Z. A. (2013). Boosting human learning by hypnosis. Cerebral Cortex, 23(4), 801–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. J., Tremblay, A., Nichols, E. S., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The influence of language proficiency on lexical semantic processing in native and late learners of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1205–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., Deeley, Q., & Halligan, P. W. (2007). Hypnotic depth and response to suggestion under standardized conditions and during fMRI scanning. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 55, 32–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(6), 264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchett, S., Zilberg, E., Xu, Z. M., Myles, P., Brown, I., & Burton, D. (2010). Peak and averaged bicoherence for different EEG patterns during general anaesthesia. Biomedical Engineering Online, 9, 76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammsayer, T. H. (2014). The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(4), 1185–1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102( 28), 9978–9983.
   Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Landzberg, K. S., Schweizer, H. R., Zephrani, Z. R., Shapiro, T., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia. Consciousness and cognition, 12(3), 332–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, A., Shapiro, T., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(12), 1155–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical learning learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata, K. I., & Anderson, J. P. (1970). The effects of posthypnotic suggestion on test performance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18, 61–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzberg, H. C., & Depiano, F. A. (1980). Hypnotizability and task motivating suggestions: A further look at how they affect performance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28, 261–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2003). ERP evidence for a sex-specific Stroop effect in emotional speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(8), 1135–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalev, L., & Tsal, Y. (2003). The wide attentional window A major deficit of children with attention difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, N., & Frost, R. (2015). Statistical learning as an individual ability: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 105–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., & Bodorik, H. L. (1977). Suggested amnesia and disorganized recall in hypnotic and task-motivated subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takarada, Y., & Nozaki, D. (2014). Hypnotic suggestion alters the state of the motor cortex. Neuroscience Research, 85, 28–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2010). Disruption of synaesthesia by posthypnotic suggestion: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 48(11), 3360–3364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Johnson, M. K., & Chun, M. V. (2010). Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11177–11187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2002). The Intractibility of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. Psychophysiology, 39, 791–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2006). Interpreting event-related brain potentials (ERP) distributions: Implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling. Biological Psychology, 72, 333–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaitl, D., Birbaumer, N., Gruzelier, J., Jamieson, G. A., Kotchoubey, B., Kubler, A., Lehmann, D., Miltner, W. H. R., Ott, U., Putz, P., Sammer, G., Strauch, I., Strehl, U., Wackermann, J., & Weiss, T. (2005). Psychobiology of altered states of consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 98–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhaudenhuyse, A., Laureys, S., & Faymonville, M. E. (2014). Neurophysiology of hypnosis. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 44(4), 343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 343–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter A. L. (1964). Contingent Negative Variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence—2nd ed. San Antonio TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierda, S. M., van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N. A., & Martens, S. (2010). Distracting the mind improves performance: An ERP study. PloS One, 5, e15024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100(1), 125–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them. In: M. R. Nash, & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 255-282), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S. S., & Rugg, M. D. (2010). Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition. Brain Research, 1320, 74–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar