Instrumental variable methods for identifying partial differential equation models

References

• Ali, M., Ali, A., Chughtai, S.S., & Werner, H. (2011). Consistent identification of spatially interconnected systems. American Control Conference (ACC) (pp. 3583–3588). June 29–July 1, San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Claes, J. (1987). Numerical solution of partial differential equations by the finite element method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garnier, H., Mensler, M., & Richard, A. (2003). Continuous-time model identification from sampled data. Implementation issues and performance evaluation. International Journal of Control, 76, 1337–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, H., & Wang, L. (Eds.). (2008). Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, M., Garnier, H., Young, P.C., & Van den Hof, P. (2008). Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop continuous-time model identification. In H. Garnier & L. Wang (Eds.), Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data (pp. 133–160). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L., & Billings, S.A. (2006). Identification of partial differential equation models for continuous spatio-temporal dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems, 53, 657–661.
   Google Scholar
• Kubrusly, C.S. (1977). Distributed parameter system identification-A survey. International Journal of Control, 26, 509–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H.X., & Qi, C. (2010). Modeling of distributed parameter systems for applications-A synthesized review from time-space separation. Journal of Process Control, 20, 891–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2005). Grey-box identification of distributed parameter systems ( PhD thesis in Automatic Control). Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ljung, L. (1999). System identification, theory for the user (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, S.J., Chaturvedi, N.A., & Krstić, M. (2012a). PDE estimation techniques for advanced battery management systems-part I: SOC estimation. Proceedings – American Control Conference. Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, S.J., Chaturvedi, N.A., & Krstić, M. (2012b). PDE estimation techniques for advanced battery management systems-part II: SOH identification. Proceedings - American Control Conference. Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Price, L., Young, P.C., Berckmans, D., Janssens, K., & Taylor, J. (1999). Data-based mechanistic modelling and control of mass and energy transfer in agricultural buildings. Annual reviews in Control, 23, 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, G., & Unbehauen, H. (2006). Identification of continuous-time systems. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 153, 185–220.
   Google Scholar
• Sadabadi, M.S., Shafiee, M., & Karrari, M. (2008a). Parameter estimation of two-dimensional linear differential systems via Fourier based modulation function. World IFAC Congress, Seoul South-Korea, 17, 14385–14390.
   Google Scholar
• Sadabadi, M.S., Shafiee, M., & Karrari, M. (2008b). System identification of two-dimensional continuous-time systems using wavelets as modulating functions. ISA Transactions, 47, 256–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagara, S., Yang, Z.J., & Wada, K. (1991). Parameter identification of distributed-parameter systems in the presence of measurement noise. International Journal of Systems Science, 22(8), 1391–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagara, S., Zhao, Z.Y., & Wada, K. (1990). Parameter estimation of distributed-parameter systems under noisy measurements. Systems Science, 16, 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, T., & Stoica, P. (1983). Instrumental variable methods for system identification. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.J., Young, P.C., Chotai, A., & Whittaker, J. (1998). Non-minimal state space approach to multivariable ramp metering control of motorway bottlenecks. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 145, 568–574.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, M., & McIntyre, N. (2012). An assessment of DBM flood forecasting models. Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management, 165, 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, S.G., Young, P.C., & Beven, K.J. (1989). Experimental investigation of the aggregated dead zone model for longitudinal solute transport in stream channels. Proceedings Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 2, 87, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Garnier, H. (Eds.). (2012). System identification, environmental modelling and control system design. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1969). Applying parameter estimation to dynamic systems: Part II - Applications. Control Engineering, 16, 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1970). An instrumental variable method for real-time identification of a noisy process. Automatica, 6, 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (1984). Recursive estimation and time-series analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C. (2011). Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction for the student and practitioner (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C., Garnier, H., & Gilson, M. (2008). Refined instrumental variable identification of continuous-time hybrid Box-Jenkins models. In H. Garnier & L. Wang (Eds.), Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data (pp. 91–132). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C., Garnier, H., & Gilson, M. (2009). Simple refined IV methods of closed-loop system identification. 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID’2009). Saint-Malo (France), July 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P.C., & Jakeman, A. (1980). Refined instrumental variable methods of time-series analysis: Part III, Extensions. International Journal of Control, 31, 741–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar