Dynamic interpolation for obstacle avoidance on Riemannian manifolds

References

• Altafini, C. (2004). Reduction by group symmetry of second order variational problems on a semi-direct product of Lie groups with positive definite Riemannian metric. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 10(4), 526–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assif, M., Banavar, R., Bloch, A., Camarinha, M., & Colombo, L. (2018). Variational collision avoidance problems on Riemannian manifolds. 2018 IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC) (pp. 2791–2796). Miami Beach, FL. doi:10.1109/CDC.2018.8619596
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., Bai, Y., & Henninger, H. (2018). Attitude guidance and tracking for spacecraft with two reaction wheels. International Journal of Control, 91(4), 926–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Colley, L. (2016). Geometric attitude motion planning for spacecraft with pointing and actuator constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(7), 1672–1677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., Baillieul, J., Crouch, P. E., Marsden, J. E., & Zenkov, D. (2015). Nonholonomic mechanics and control (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., Camarinha, M., & Colombo, L. (2017). Variational obstacle avoidance on Riemannian manifolds. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on decision and control (pp. 146–150). Melbourne, Australia. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04703
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, A. M., Colombo, L. J., Gupta, R., & Ohsawa, T. (2017). Optimal control problems with symmetry breaking cost functions. SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, 1(1), 626–646. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.06973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., & Crouch, P. (1993). Nonholonomic and vakonomic control systems on Riemannian manifolds. Fields Institute Communications, 1, 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., & Crouch, P. (1995). Nonholonomic control systems on Riemannian manifolds. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 33, 126–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothby, W. M. (1975). An introduction to differentiable manifolds and Riemannian geometry. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Bretl, T., & McCarthy, Z. (2014). Quasi-static manipulation of a Kirchhoff elastic rod based on a geometric analysis of equilibrium configurations. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 33(1), 48–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullo, F., & Lewis, A. D. (2005). Geometric control of mechanical systems, ser. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Modeling, analysis, and design for simple mechanical control systems (Vol. 49). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Camarinha, M. (1996). The geometry of cubic polynomials in Riemannian manifolds (Ph.D. thesis). Univ. de Coimbra.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. (2017). Second-order constrained variational problems on Lie algebroids: Applications to optimal control. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 9(1), 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., & Martín de Diego, D. (2014). Higher-order variational problems on Lie groups and optimal control applications. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 6(4), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, P., & Jackson, J. (1991). A nonholonomic dynamic interpolation problem. In B. Bonnard, B. Bride, J. P. Gauthier, & I. Kupka (Eds.), Analysis of controlled dynamical systems (Lyon, 1990) (pp. 156–166). Progr. Systems Control Theory, 8, Boston, MA: Birkhauser Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, P., & Silva Leite, F. (1991). Geometry and the dynamic interpolation problem. Proceedings of the American control conference (pp. 1131–1137).
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, P., & Silva Leite, F. (1995). The dynamic interpolation problem: On Riemannian manifolds, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 1(2), 177–202.
   Google Scholar
• De Alessandro, D. (2002). The optimal control problem on SO(4) and its applications to quantum control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 47(1), 87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garay, O. J., & Noakes, L. (2014). Elastic helices in simple Lie groups. Journal of Lie Theory, 25(1), 215–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay-Balmaz, F., Holm, D. D., Meier, D. M., Ratiu, T. S., & Vialard, F.-X. (2012). Invariant higher-order variational problems. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 309, 413–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giambó, R., Giannoni, F., & Piccione, P. (2002). An analytical theory for Riemannian cubic polynomials. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 19, 445–460.
   Google Scholar
• Giambó, R., Giannoni, F., & Piccione, P. (2003). Optimal control on Riemannian manifolds by interpolation. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems (MCSS), 16, 278–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S., Perkins, N., & Lee, C. (2005). Nonlinear dynamics and loop formation in Kirchhoff rods with implications to the mechanics of DNA and cables. Journal of Computational Physics, 209(1), 371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeren, B., Rumpf, M., & Wirth, B. (2017). Variational time discretization of Riemannian splines. Arxiv 1711.06069.
   Google Scholar
• Henninger, H. C., & Biggs, J. D. (2018). Optimal under-actuated kinematic motion planning on the ε-group. Automatica, 90, 185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M., & Smale, S. (1974). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and linear algebra. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, I., & Bloch, A. (2007). Dynamic coverage optimal control for multiple spacecraft interferometric imaging. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 13(1), 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J., & Biggs, J. (2015). Trajectory generation using sub-Riemannian curves for quadroto UAVs. Proceedings of the 2015 European control conference (ECC 2015) 15–17 July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kadam, S., & Banavar, R. (2018). Variational dynamic interpolation for kinematic systems on trivial principal bundles. Preprint 2018. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.00414.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, O. (1986). Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(1), 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koditschek, D. (1989). Robot planning and control via potential functions. In Reprinted from The robotics review, Part 1 (pp. 349–367). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T., Leok, M., & McClamroch, N. (2010). Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SE(3). Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control (pp. 5420–5425).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, N., & Fiorelli, E. (2001). Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups. IEEE conference on decision and control (pp. 2968–2973).
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, N., & Krishnaprasad, P. (1995). Motion control of drift-free, left-invariant systems on Lie groups. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(9), 1539–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Geng, Z. (2013). Finite-time optimal formation control of multi-agent systems on the Lie group SE(3). International Journal of Control, 86, 1675–1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, L., Silva Leite, F., & Krakowski, K. (2010). Higher-order smoothing splines versus least squares problems on Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 16(1), 121–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markdahl, J., Hoppe, J., Wang, L., & Hu, X (2017). A geodesic feedback law to decouple the full and reduced attitude. Systems & Control Letters, 102, 32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milnor, J. (2002). Morse theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noakes, L., Heinzinger, G., & Paden, B. (1989). Cubic splines on curved spaces. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 6, 465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva Leite, F., Camarinha, M., & Crouch, P. (2000). Elastic curves as solutions of Riemannian and sub-Riemannian control problems. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 13(2), 140–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smale, S. (1961, July). On gradient dynamical systems. Annals of Mathematics, 74(1), 199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vershik, A. M., & Gershkovich, V. Ya. (1988). Nonholonomic problems and the theory of distributions. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 12(2), 181–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zefran, M., Kumar, V., & Croke, C. (1998). On the generation of smooth three-dimensional rigid body motions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(4), 576–589.
   Google Scholar