Fast and virtually exact quantum gate generation in U(n) via iterative Lyapunov methods

References

• Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., & Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16) (pp. 265–283). Savannah, GA: USENIX Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cong, S. (2014). Control of quantum systems: Theory and methods. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coron, J. M. (2007). Control and nonlinearity. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• D'Alessandro, D. (2008). Introduction to quantum control and dynamics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, D., & Petersen, I. R. (2010). Quantum control theory and applications: A survey. IET Control Theory & Applications, 4, 2651–2671. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivopoulos, S., & Bamieh, B. (2003). Lyapunov-based control of quantum systems. 42nd IEEE CDC, Maui, Hawaii (Vol. 1, pp. 434–438).
   Google Scholar
• Heeres, R. W., Reinhold, P., Ofek, N., Frunzio, L., Jiang, L., Devoret, M. H., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2017). Implementing a universal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator. Nature Communications, 8. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00045-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, N. J. (2008). Functions of matrices. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, H. K. (2002). Nonlinear systems (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Khaneja, N., Glaser, S. J., & Brockett, R. (2002). Sub-Riemannian geometry and time optimal control of three spin systems: Quantum gates and coherence transfer. Physical Review A, 65, 032301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., & Glaser, S. J. (2005). Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: Design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 172, 296–305. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, N., Abdelhafez, M., Koch, J., & Schuster, D. (2017). Speedup for quantum optimal control from automatic differentiation based on graphics processing units. Physical Review A, 95, 042318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirrahimi, M. (2009). Lyapunov control of a quantum particle in a decaying potential. In M. J. Esteban & E. Séré (Eds.), Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) non linear analysis (Vol. 26, pp. 1743–1765). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mirrahimi, M., Rouchon, P., & Turinici, G. (2005). Lyapunov control of bilinear Schrödinger equations. Automatica, 41, 1987–1994. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palao, J. P., & Kosloff, R. (2002). Quantum computing by an optimal control algorithm for unitary transformations. Physical Review Letters, 89, 188301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.188301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palao, J. P., & Kosloff, R. (2003). Optimal control theory for unitary transformations. Physical Review A, 68, 062308. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Ugrinovskii, V., & James, M. R. (2015, July). Lyapunov analysis for coherent control of quantum systems by dissipation. 2015 American control conference (ACC), Chicago, IL (pp. 98–103).
   Google Scholar
• Pereira da Silva, P. S., Rouchon, P., & Silveira, H. B. (2018). Geração rápida e virtualmente exata de portas quânticas via métodos iterativos do tipo Lyapunov. Proc. CBA'2018 – Congresso Brasileiro de Automática, Brazilian Control Conference, João Pessoa, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira da Silva, P. S., Silveira, H. B., & Rouchon, P. (2019). supplementary_material.pdf. https://figshare.com/articles/supplementary_material_pdf/8226314
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, S. G., & de Fouquieres, P. (2011). Efficient algorithms for optimal control of quantum dynamics: The Krotov method unencumbered. New Journal of Physics, 13, 073029. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte-Herbrüggen, T., Spörl, A., Khaneja, N., & Glaser, S. J. (2005). Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms: A perspective from network complexity towards time complexity. Physical Review A, 72, 042331. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, H. B., Pereira da Silva, P. S., & Rouchon, P. (2014). Quantum gate generation by T-sampling stabilization. International Journal of Control, 87, 1227–1242. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2013.873951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, H. B., Pereira da Silva, P. S., & Rouchon, P. (2016). Quantum gate generation for systems with drift in U(n) using Lyapunov-LaSalle techniques. International Journal of Control, 89, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00207179.2016.1161830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, N., Tsumura, K., & Hara, S. (2007). Feedback control of quantum entanglement in a two-spin system. Automatica, 43, 981–992. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2006.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Liu, Y. X., Wu, R. B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2014). Quantum feedback: theory, experiments, and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.8536.
   Google Scholar