Expectations and implementations of the flipped classroom model in undergraduate mathematics courses

References

• Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. High Educ Res Dev. 2014;34(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Learning Technology Center, Hybrid Courses, 2015. Available from: http://www4.uwm.edu/ltc/hybrid/about_hybrid/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld AH. Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Not Am Math Soc. 2000;47(6):641–649.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JW. The “classroom flip”: using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning; 2000 Apr 12–15; Jacksonville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Lage MJ, Platt GJ, Treglia, M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31(1):30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herreid CF, Schiller NA. Case studies and the flipped classroom. J Col Sci Teach. 2013;42(5):62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop JL, Verleger MA. The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings; 2013 Jun 23–26; Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Gannod G, Burge J, Helmick M. Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering; 2008 May 10–18; Leipzig, Germany. p. 777–786.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann J. [Blog post]. History of the flipped class: how the flipped class was born; 2011 May 6 [cited 2014 Feb 22]. Available from: http://flipped-learning.com/?p=136.
   Google Scholar
• Boutell M, Clifton, C. SPLICE: self-paced learning in an inverted classroom environment. Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education; 2011 Mar 9–12; Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert R. Learning MATLAB in the inverted classroom. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2012 Jun 10–13; San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Jungić V, Kaur H, Mulholland J, et al. On flipping the classroom in large first year calculus courses. Int J Math Edu Sci Technol. 2015;46(4):508–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague J, Czocher J, Baker G. Using the flipped model to address cognitive obstacles in differential equations. In: Brown S, Karakok G, Roh KH, Oehrtman M, editors. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education; 2013 Feb 21–23; Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert R. Inverting the linear algebra classroom. Primus. 2014;24(5):361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer JF. The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system [dissertation]. Columbus (OH): The Ohio State University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lape NK, Levy R, Yong DH, et al. Probing the inverted classroom: a controlled study of teaching and learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering and mathematics. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition; 2014 Jun 15–18; Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Love B, Hodge A, Grandgenett N, et al. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. Int J Math Edu Sci Technol. 2014;45(3):317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley SF. Improving student success in calculus: a comparison of four college calculus classes [dissertation]. San Diego (CA): San Diego State University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman N, Norris, S., Carr, T. Comparing a “flipped” instructional model in an undergraduate Calculus III course. In: Brown S, Karakok G, Roh KH, Oehrtman M, editors. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education; 2013 Feb 21–23; Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• McGivney-Burelle J, Xue F. Flipping calculus. Primus. 2013;23(5):477–486.
   Google Scholar
• Code W, Piccolo C, Kohler D, MacLean M. Teaching methods comparison in a large calculus class. ZDM. 2014;46(4):589–601.
   Google Scholar
• Eager EA, Peirce J, Barlow P. Math Bio or Biomath? Flipping the mathematical biology classroom. Lett Biomath. 2014;1(2):139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994. p. 273–285.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York (NY): NYU Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Heibert J, Lefevre P. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of mathematics. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Brecht H. Learning from online video lectures. J Inform Technol Educ. 2012;11(1):227–250.
   Google Scholar
• Loch B, Borland R. The transition from traditional face-to-face teaching to blended learning – implications and challenges from a mathematics discipline perspective. In: Hegarty B, McDonald J, Loke SK, editors. Proceedings of the 31st Annual ASCILITE Conference; 2014 Nov 23–26; Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar