Live lectures or online videos: students’ resource choices in a first-year university mathematics module

References

• Watt, HMG, Goos, M. Theoretical foundations of engagement in mathematics. Math Ed Res J. 2017;29:133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Witthaus GR, Robinson CL. Lecture capture literature review: A review of the literature from 2012--2015. Loughborough: Loughborough University; 2015. Available from: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/25712/3/Witthaus_Lecture%20 Capture_April206%20%2813%29.pd
   Google Scholar
• Brooks C, Erikson G, Greer J, et al. Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Comput Educ. 2014;75:282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis M, Palipana A, Trenholm S, et al. Individual differences in students’ use of optional learning resources. J Comput Assist Learn. 2011;27(6):490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust G, Elen J, Clarebout G. Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: student differences and performance effects. Comput Educ. 2013;60:385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenholm S, Alcock L, Robinson CL. Mathematics lecturing in the digital age. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2012;43(6):703–716.
   Google Scholar
• Bassili J. Promotion and prevention orientations in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. J Comput Assist Learn. 2006;22(6):444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW-Y. Investigating students’ learning approaches, perceptions of online discussions, and students’ online and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2013;68:345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon Y, Lawson D, Croft T. Dealing with ‘fragile identities’: resistance and refiguring in women mathematics students. Gend Educ. 2011;23(5):565–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcock L, Attridge N, Kenny S, et al. Achievement and behaviour in undergraduate mathematics: personality is a better predictor than gender. Res Math Educ. 2014;16(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon C, Oates G, Sneddon J. Undergraduate mathematics students' reasons for attending live lectures when recordings are available. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2014;45(2):227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm Ltd; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Wang MJ. Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian J Educ Tech. 2010;26(6):830–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin A, Meehan M. The development and evolution of an advanced data management system in a Mathematics Support Centre. In: Green D, editor. Proceedings of the CETL-MSOR conference 2015; 2016 Sep 8–9; London (UK); p. 21–22. Available from: http://mei.org.uk/files/pdf/CETL-MSOR2015-Conference-Proceedings-online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curley N, Meehan M. The challenge of collecting useful qualitative data on students' visits to a Mathematics Support Centre at a university in Ireland. In: Adams G, editor. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics; 2015 Feb 27–28; Dublin; p. 25–30. Available from: http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BSRLM-IP-35-1-05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meehan M, McCallig, J. Effects on learning of time spent by university students on lectures and/or videos. Manuscript Prep.
   Google Scholar
• Scrucca L, Fop M, Murphy TB, et al. mclust 5: clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. R J. 2016;8:289–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Q. What is NVIVO? [ Internet] 2017. [cited 2017 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.qsrinternational.com/what-is-nvivo.
   Google Scholar
• DeBell M, Krosnick JA. Computing weights for american national election study survey. Ann Arbor, MI, and Palo Alto, CA: American National; 2009. ( ANES Technical Report series no. nes012427.).
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard D. Where learning starts? a framework for thinking about lectures in university mathematics. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2010;41(5):609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard initiative for learning & teaching. lecture attendance research: methods and preliminary findings. [ Internet][cited 2017 June 20.]. Available from: http://hilt.harvard.edu/files/hilt/files/attendancestudy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman LS. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res. 1986;15(2):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Khan S. Let's use video to reinvent education. [ Internet][cited 2017 June 20.]. TED Ideas worth spreading. [ Internet]. 2011 March. Available from: http://www.ted.com/talks/salman_khan_let_s_use_video_to_reinvent_education/transcript?language=en.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom BS. Learning for Mastery. In: Bloom BS, Hastings JT, Madaus GF, editors. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1971. p. 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Alcock L, Hodds M, Roy S, et al. Investigating and improving undergraduate proof comprehension. Notices Amer Math Soc. 2015;62(7):1.
   Google Scholar