Mathematics for biological sciences undergraduates: a needs assessment

References

• Edelstein-Keshet L. Adapting mathematics to the new biology. In: LA Steen, editor. Math and bio 2010: linking undergraduate disciplines. Washington, DC: MAA; 2005. p. 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson KV, Chmielewski J, Gaines MS, et al. Competency-based reforms of the undergraduate biology curriculum: integrating the physical and biological sciences. CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2013;12(2):162–169. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson KV, Cooke TJ, Fagan WF, et al. Infusing quantitative approaches throughout the biological sciences curriculum. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2013;44(6):817–833. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.812754.
   Google Scholar
• van der Hoff Q. Interdisciplinary education–a predator–prey model for developing a skill set in mathematics, biology and technology. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2017;48(6):928–938. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1285061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. Bio 2010: transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ganter SL, Barker W. The curriculum foundations project: voices of the partner disciplines. Washington (DC): Mathematical Association of America; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• AAAS. Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A view for the 21st century. Washington (D.C.): AAAS; 2009; Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/finalreport/.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton CD, Highlander HC. The case for biocalculus: design, retention, and student performance. CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2017;16(2):ar25. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-04-0096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch DW, Mavis B. A needs assessment study of undergraduate surgical education. Can J Surg. 2006;49(5):335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr MM, Brown DH, Reznick RK. Needs assessment for an undergraduate otolaryngology curriculum. Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg. 1999;120(6):865–868. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70328-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran D, Xu X, Dewald S, et al. An alumni survey as a needs assessment for curriculum improvement in obstetrics and gynecology. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):317–321. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-11-00122.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston L, Jeffryes J. Data management skills needed by structural engineering students: case study at the University of Minnesota. J Profl Issues Eng Educ Pract. 2014;140(2): 05013002, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethbridge TC. What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer. 2000;33(5):44–50. doi: 10.1109/2.841783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surakka S, Malmi L. Need assessment of computer science and engineering graduates. Comput Sci Educ. 2005;15(2):103–121. doi: 10.1080/08993400500150762
   Google Scholar
• Cowling JD. Needs analysis: planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. Engl Specif Purp. 2007;26(4):426–442. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris D. Students’ views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Q. 1998;32(2):289–316. doi:10.2307/3587585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschuld JW, Kumar DD. Needs assessment: An overview. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ary D, Jacobs LC, Razavieh A, et al. Introduction to research in education. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11(3):255–274. doi:10.2307/1163620.
   Google Scholar
• Allum JR, Okahana H. (2015). Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2004 to 2014. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://cgsnet.org/graduate-enrollment-and-degrees.
   Google Scholar
• NSF. (2014). nsf.gov – Table 28 – NCSES Graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering: 2014 – US National Science Foundation (NSF). Retrieved June 12, 2016, from https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/gradpostdoc/2014/html/GSS2014_DST_28.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Biological science teachers, postsecondary. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes251042.htm#nat.
   Google Scholar
• Jones T, Huggett S, Kamalski J. Finding a way through the scientific literature: indexes and measures. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(1–2):36–38. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters T. (2012). Web of Science. Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/group/16364/article/10711444.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley JL, Heaney MJ. Needs assessment across disciplines. Perform Improv Q. 2008;7(1):60–79. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1994.tb00617.x.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins R, Leigh D, Platt W, et al. Needs assessment—A digest, review, and comparison of needs assessment literature. Perform Improv. 1998;37(7):40–53. doi:10.1002/pfi.4140370711.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin BR. Needs assessment since 1981: The state of the practice. Eval Pract. 1994;15(1):17–27. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90056-6.
   Google Scholar
• Weijters B, Cabooter E, Schillewaert N. The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. Int J Res Mark. 2010;27(3):236–247. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol. 2000;104(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecolog-L. (n.d.). Retrieved from [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Evoldir. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://life.mcmaster.ca/evoldir.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Node. (n.d.). Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://thenode.biologists.com.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. New York (NY): Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer J, Speerschneider K. (2015). Likert: Functions to analyze and visualize Likert type items. Retrieved from http://jason.bryer.org/likert, http://github.com/jbryer/likert.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Jain A, Marshall J, Buikema A, et al. Autism occurrence by MMR vaccine status among US children with older siblings with and without autism. JAMA. 2015;313(15):1534–1540. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima EA, Almeida RC, Oden JT. Analysis and numerical solution of stochastic phase-field models of tumor growth. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2015;31(2):552–574. doi: 10.1002/num.21934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov JB, Reid AH, Yamamoto KR. Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: A new biology education for the twenty-first century? CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2010;9(1):10–16. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-12-0092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar