Experienced engineers becoming mathematics teachers: preliminary perceptions of mathematics teaching

References

• Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2016). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2017–2018. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2017-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Aroshas, S., Verner, I., & Berman A. (2007). Integration of applications in the Technion Calculus Course. Mathematical modelling (pp. 433–442). Chichester: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Balatti, J., & Rigano, D. (Eds.). (2011). Preservice teacher perceptions of good mathematics teachers: What matters. Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices. Proceedings of the AAMT-MERGA conference, Alice Springs: AAMT & MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2–38. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.1.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In Romberg EFTA (Ed.), Classrooms that promote mathematical understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, T. J. (1985). A beginning teacher's view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336. doi: 10.2307/749355
   Google Scholar
• Dayal, H. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ reflections on good and bad mathematics teaching. Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (pp. 226–232). Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Dossey, J. A. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39–48). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M., Loch, B., & Scott, W. (2017). The effectiveness of resources created by students as partners in explaining the relevance of mathematics in engineering education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–15. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2017.1338771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33. doi: 10.1080/0260747890150102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (2012). What is our first philosophy in mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(3), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (2016). Values and mathematics: Overt and covert. Paper presented at mathematical cultures 2, London, 17–19 September 2013. Revised version in Culture and dialogue, 4(1), 48–82. (Special issue culture, science and dialogue, Guest Editor: M. Ovens).
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. ( G. Kaiser, Ed.). Hamburg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., Black, L., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Pepin, B., & Williams, J. (2015). Mathematics and its value for engineering students: What are the implications for teaching? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(3), 321–336. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2014.979893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (2013). Experiencing mathematics: What do we do, when we do mathematics? American Mathematical Society. Retrieved from https://bookstore.ams.org/mbk-83/182
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics ( Vol. 1, pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2012). ‘I finally get it!’ Developing mathematical understanding during teacher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 563–574.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyte, J. (2013). Mathematics: Going beyond the academic discipline. Proceedings of the tenth annual college of education & GSN research conference, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. doi:10.1037/a0032583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63. doi: 10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepik, M., Pipere, A., & Hannula, M. S. (2012). Comparing mathematics teachers’ beliefs about good teaching: The cases of Estonia, Latvia and Finland. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3–4), 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, S. (2002). Participation and reification in learning to teach: The role of knowledge and beliefs. Mathematics Education Library, 31, 195–210. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47958-3_12
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2017, November 25). Springfield, MO: Merriam-Webster Inc. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mathematics
   Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster. (2018, July 22). Springfield, MO: Merriam-Webster Inc. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/engineering
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1998). What is understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding. Linking research with practice (pp. 39–57). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, A., & Cavanagh, M. (Eds.). (2006). An investigation of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs as they begin their teacher training. Conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia. Canberra: MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (2009). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–471). New York, NY: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Program solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011a). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011b). Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 457–469. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0307-8
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törner, G. (Ed.). (2014). Beliefs – no longer a hidden variable, but in spite of this: Where are we now and where are we going? Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XX, MAVI-20 Conference, Falun.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. S., Cooney, T. J., & Stinson, D. W. (2005). What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: Nine high school teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 83–111. doi: 10.1007/s10857-005-4796-7
   Google Scholar
• Winkelman, P. (2009). Perceptions of mathematics in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 305–316. doi: 10.1080/03043790902987378
   Google Scholar
• Wiske, M. (1998). Teaching for understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar