Mathematics teaching pedagogies to tertiary engineering and information technology students: a literature review

References

• Abaté, C. J., & Cantone, K. A. (2005). An evolutionary approach to mathematics education: Enhancing learning through contextual modification. Problems, Resources, Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 15(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970508984115
   Google Scholar
• Aguillo, I. F. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktas, C., & Omurtag, Y. (2013). Online teaching of engineering statistics: A comparative case study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 504–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S. A., Ma, T., & Capraro, M. M. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs and attitude about teaching and learning mathematics through music: An intervention study. School Science and Mathematics, 111(5), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00082.x
   Google Scholar
• Benken, B. M., Ramirez, J., Li, X., & Wetendorf, S. (2015). Developmental mathematics success: Impact of students’ knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(2), 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• Borovik, A. (2011). Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: A mathematician’s point of view. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i1.17106
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, J., Mourik, I. V., Rasch, M., Sieverts, E., & Verhoeff, H. (2006). Scopus reviewed and compared: The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of science and Google Scholar. Utrecht University Library. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/18247.
   Google Scholar
• Chubin, D., Donaldson, K., Olds, B., & Fleming, L. (2008). Educating generation net—can US engineering woo and win the competition for talent? Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darmawan, M., & Hidayah, N. (2017). Application of scl-pbl method to increase quality learning of industrial statistics course in department of industrial engineering pancasila university. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Tanjung Pandan - Belitung, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, A., García, A., & Villa, A. (2010). An example of competence-based learning: Use of Maxima in Linear Algebra for Engineers. Technology and its Integration into Mathematics Education Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., Converse, M., Wenderoth, M. P., & Schinske, J. (2015). PORTAAL: A classroom observation tool assessing evidence-based teaching practices for active learning in large science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar23,1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fengchun, L., Chunying, Z., & Jing, W. (2009). Computer technology for research on Math major practice teaching in engineering colleges. 2009 4th International Conference on Computer Science & Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, H. (2015). A case study of an experiment using streaming of lectures in teaching engineering mathematics. Teaching Mathematics its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 34(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjerrouit, S. (2015). Evaluating the interactive learning tool simreal+ for visualizing and simulating mathematical concepts. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, H. J., & Choi, M. R. (2014). Experiences from flipped classroom by novice math teacher in middle school. International Information Institute, 17(12 (A)), 6211–6216.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. (2008). Helping engineers learn mathematics: A developmental research approach. International Journal of the IMA, 27(3), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrn006
   Google Scholar
• Juan, A. A., Steegmann, C., Huertas, A., Jesus Martinez, M., & Simosa, J. (2011). Teaching mathematics online in the European Area of higher education: An instructor's point of view. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.526254
   Google Scholar
• Kafata, F., & Mbetwa, S. K. (2016). An investigation into the failure rate in mathematics and science at grade twelve (12) examinations and its impact to the school of engineering: A case study of Kitwe District Of Zambia. International Journal of Scientific Technology Research, 5((08|8)), 71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Karr, C. L., Weck, B., Sunal, D. W., & Cook, T. M. (2003). Analysis of the effectiveness of online learning in a graduate engineering math course. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., de Moya-Anegón, F., & de Nooy, W. (2016). Aggregated journal–journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2194–2211. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, M. E. (2009). Teaching mathematics: Issues and solutions. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 6(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Madeira, R. N., Silva, B., & Palma, J. (2012, April 17-20). Helping math learning. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. R. (2011). Teaching business statistics in a computer lab: Benefit or distraction? Journal of Education for Business, 86(6), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.529958
   Google Scholar
• Md Shamsudin, N. (2014). Systematic review on teaching methodologies for the infusion of creative science classroom. Journal of Educational Research, Faculty of Education, UITM.
   Google Scholar
• Nortvedt, G. A. & Siqveland, A. (2019). Are beginning calculus and engineering students adequately prepared for higher education? An assessment of students' basic mathematical knowledge International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1501826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). How is the global talent pool changing (2013, 2030)? Education Indicators in Focus, 31. https://doi.org/10.1787/22267077
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M. J., & Freitas, A. (2016). Support system for learning mathematics in engineering higher education programmes: The case of the ‘Mathematics Digital Practice Office’. 2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE).
   Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Liu, B., Chang, J., & Ji, N. (2010). Teaching reform research of mathematics analysis courses. 2010 The 2nd International Conference on Industrial Mechatronics and Automation, Wuhan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D. R., & Steck, A. K. (2015). Increasing student engagement, self-efficacy, and meta-cognitive self-regulation in the high school geometry classroom: Do iPads help? (Vol. 32). https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2015.1036650.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder-Grover, T., & Groscurth, C. (2010). Perceptions of millennial student learning: The future faculty perspective. American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Prodromou, T., & Lavicza, Z. (2017). Integrating technology into mathematics education in an entire educational system—reaching a critical mass of teachers and schools. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1564/tmev24.3.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310374880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, R. A., & Araújo, C. F. J. (2016). Mobile learning in science and mathematics teaching: A systematic review. In P. David (Ed.), Mobile and blended learning innovations for improved learning outcomes (pp. 277–296). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Ronau, R. N., Rakes, C. R., Niess, M. L., Wagener, L., Pugalee, D., Browning, C., Driskell, S. O., & Mathews, S. M. (2011). New directions in the research of technology-enhanced education. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Instructional design: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 1847–1879). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, L., Muñoz-Abella, B., Castejón, C., & Muñoz-Sánchez, A. (2010). Web-based application for descriptive geometry learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 18(3), 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, K., Braddy, L., Bailer, J., Farinelli, R., Holm, T., Mesa, V., Treisman, U., & Turner, P. (2015). A common vision for undergraduate mathematical sciences programs in 2025. Mathematical Association of America Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Searl, J. W. (1985). Mathematics for engineers and scientists: Some teaching approaches. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 16(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739850160223
   Google Scholar
• Shih, S.-C., Kuo, B.-C., & Liu, Y.-L. (2012). Adaptively ubiquitous learning in campus math path. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 298–308.
   Google Scholar
• Stanberry, M. L. (2018). Active learning: A case study of student engagement in college calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1440328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research-informed strategies. In S. Mellor (Ed.). Australian Council for Educational Research (pp. 1–72).
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Razali, M. R. (1993). Diagnosing students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739930240206
   Google Scholar
• Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning approach in learning of statistics among university students. Procedia-Social Behavioral Sciences, 8, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.054
   Google Scholar
• Tawil, N. M., Ismail, N. A., Asshaari, I., Othman, H., Zaharim, A., & Bahaludin, H. (2013). Preference learning style in engineering mathematics: Students’ perception of e-learning. International Education Studies, 6(6), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n6p61
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbussche, J., Ritter, L., & Scherrer, C. (2018). An incentivized early remediation program in calculus I. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(8), 1235–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1458340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez, J. P. G., Vargas, M. A. A., Ezkauriatza, M. G., Juarros, V. I. M., Corral, L. E. V., Espinoza, J. M. O., & Doolan, M. A. (2018). Instructional strategies and information technologies used for supporting the undergraduate mathematics teaching process: Scoping review protocol. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-C., Fu, H.-T., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, S. J. (2017). Development of an interactive mathematics learning system based on a two-tier test diagnostic and guiding strategy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-H. (2015). A two-tier test-based approach to improving students’ computer-programming skills in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 18(1), 198–210.
   Google Scholar
• Yaşar, O., Little, L., Tuzun, R., Rajasethupathy, K., Maliekal, J., & Tahar, M. (2006). Computational math, science, and technology (CMST): a strategy to improve STEM workforce and pedagogy to improve math and science education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3992, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/1175852523
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312436980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. B., Hodge, A., Edwards, M. C., & Leising, J. (2012). Learning mathematics in high school courses beyond mathematics: Combating the need for post-secondary remediation in mathematics. Career Technical Education Research, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter37.1.21
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal of Advanced Life Sciences, 6(3/4), 122–135.
   Google Scholar