The effects of STEM activities applied in mathematics courses for elementary pre-service teachers in Turkey

References

• Angle, J. M., Colston, N. M., French, D. P., Gustafson, J. E., O'Hara, S. E., & Shaw, E. I. (2016). Addressing the call to increase high school students’ STEM awareness through a collaborative event hosted by science and education faculty: A how-to approach. Science Educator, 25(1), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, Z. K., & Reeve, E. M. (2013). Developing effective STEM professional development programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, E., & Delice, A. (2007, November). Experiences of mathematics student teachers in a series of science experiments [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, Venice, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırcı, H., & Karışan, D. (2017). Investigating the pre-service primary school, mathematics and science teachers’ STEM awareness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2807
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. Q., Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010). Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 167–172.
   Google Scholar
• Bicer, A., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Mathematics achievement in the secondary high school context of STEM and non -STEM schools. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiner, J., Harkness, S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in p-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [STEM awareness scale (SAS): Validity and reliability study]. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10179a
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Yoshimatsu, N., Goda, Y., Okubo, F., Taniguchi, Y., Oi, M., Konomi, S., Shimada, A., Ogata, H., & Yamada, M. (2019). Direction of collaborative problem solving-based STEM learning by learning analytics approach. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0119-y
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275649
   Google Scholar
• Çorlu, M. A., & Çorlu, M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 514–521.
   Google Scholar
• Crippen, K. J., & Antonenko, P. D. (2018). Designing for collaborative problem solving in STEM cyberlearning. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech & D. R. Baker (Eds). Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 89–116). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. T., Miller-Friedmann, J. L., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 2(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2011.629455
   Google Scholar
• Delen, İ, & Uzun, S. (2018). Evaluating STEM based learning environments created by mathematics pre-service teachers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(3), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Collaborative project-based learning and problem-based learning in higher education: A consideration of tutor and student role in learner-focused strategies. In G. O'Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 87–98). AISHE/HEA.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban high school students’ IT/STEM learning: Findings from a collaborative inquiry-and design-based afterschool program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. D., Hudson, P., & Dawes, L. (2013). Engineering-based problem solving in the middle school: Design and construction with simple machines. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1081
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39(4), 377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, J., Alemdar, M., Lingle, J., & Newton, S. (2020). Exploring critical components of an integrated STEM curriculum: An application of the innovation implementation framework. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 51–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0204-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2011). Turkish adaptation of beliefs about mathematical problem solving instrument. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Felix, A. (2010, March). A project-based, STEM-integrated team challenge for elementary and middle school teachers in alternative energy. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3566–3573). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18028.x
   Google Scholar
• International Science Reference. (2015). STEM education, concepts, methodologies, tools and tests. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, P., & Stage, F. K. (1992). Measuring beliefs about mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12154.x
   Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., Mativo, J., & Choi, I. (2017). Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, K. Y., Yu, K. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chang, Y. S., & Chien, Y. H. (2020). Effects of web-based versus classroom-based STEM learning environments on the development of collaborative problem-solving skills in junior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9488-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1988). Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/749407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentzer, N. (2011). High school engineering and technology education integration through design challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(2), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.30707/JSTE48.2Mentzer
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2013). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice (pp. 35–60). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. TIES. http://www.wytheexcellence.org/media/STEM_Articles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS advanced 2015 international results in advanced mathematics and physics. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. (1977). Position paper on basic mathematical skills. Arithmetic Teacher, 25(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.25.1.0018
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Executive summary: Principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/resource/13158/dbasse_071100.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academic Press. https://www.nap.edu/download/13165
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsb07114/nsb07114.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nite, S. B., Margaret, M., Capraro, R. M., Morgan, J., & Peterson, C. A. (2014, October). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A longitudinal examination of secondary school intervention. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–7). Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Öner, A. T., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). Is STEM academy designation synonymous with higher student achievement? Education and Science, 41(185), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.3397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öner, A. T., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). The effect of T-STEM designation on charter schools: A longitudinal examination of students’ mathematics achievement. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.17778
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pang, J., & Good, R. (2000). A review of the integration of science and mathematics: Implications for further research. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17239.x
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I., Smith, E. L., McKinney, D., & Laurier, A. (2016). The application of the engineering design process to curriculum revision: A collaborative approach to STEM curriculum refinement in an urban district. School Science and Mathematics, 116(7), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1997). Nasıl çözmeli? matematikte yeni bir boyut [How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method]. Sistem Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. E. (2012). Integrative STEM education as best practice. In H. Middleton (Ed.), Explorations of best practice in technology, design, & engineering education (pp. 103–117). Griffith Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H. (2011, May). STEM reform: Which way to go? [Paper presentation]. The National Academies Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment for Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education: A Workshop. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/749440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Problem solving from cradle to grave. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 11, 41–73.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2012). An investigation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the US. Journal of STEM Education, 13(5), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Selcuk, S. G., Caliskan, S., & Erol, M. (2008). The effects of problem solving instruction on physics achievement, problem solving performance and strategy use. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(3), 151–166.
   Google Scholar
• Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2019). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: A literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443172.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sondergeld, T. A., Johnson, C. C., & Walten, J. B. (2016). Assessing the impact of a statewide STEM investment on K–12, higher education, and business/community STEM awareness over time. School Science and Mathematics, 116(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, K., Harkness, S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17951.x
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
   Google Scholar
• Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda: An update of state actions. NGA Center for Best Practices. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532528.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Council of Higher Education [TCoHE]. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmenliği lisans programı [Science teacher education undergraduate program]. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/41805112/Fen_Bilgisi_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Progra mi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turnip, B., Wahyuni, I., & Tanjung, Y. I. (2016). The effect of inquiry training learning model based on just in time teaching for problem solving skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, T., Boecking, M., Stone, J., Tiger, E. P., Gomez, A., Guillen, A., & Arreguin, A. (2014). Group tasks, activities, dynamics, and interactions in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 39–45.
   Google Scholar