Promoting creative insubordination using Escape Games in mathematics

References

• Antonietti, A. (2011). La creatività s’impara. Metodi e tecniche per lo sviluppo del pensiero divergente a scuola. Giunti Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Arnal Palaciàn, M., Macías García, J. A., & Tosso, I. D. (2019). Escape rooms as a way to teach magnitudes and measure in degrees in education. In E. Bacenetti (Ed.), New perspectives in science education (pp. 1–4). Libreria Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, P. (2015). Playfulness and creativity. Current Biology, 25(1), R12–R16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (2006). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. (2001). Little c creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45–61). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, N. (2018). Escape classroom: The leblanc process – An educational “escape game”. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 996–999. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, B. (2016). Pink boxes and chocolate-dipped broccoli: Bad game design providing justifications for reluctant learners. In C. Steinkuehler (Ed.), Proceedings of 11th games + learning + society conference.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. (2006). The role of the knowledge base in creative thinking. In J. C. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 137–144). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Cabrera, A., Parra-González, M. E., López-Belmonte, J., & Segura-Robles, A. (2020). Learning mathematics with emerging methodologies – The escape room as a case study. Mathematics, 8(9), 1586–1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2011). An analysis of the blind variation and selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.571187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. (2011). Mathematical habits of mind: Promoting students’ thoughtful considerations. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.578664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grando, R. C., & Lopes, C. E. (2020). Creative insubordination of teachers proposing statistics and probability problems to children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(4), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01166-6
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, C., Arís, N., Magreñán Ruiz, ÁA, & Orcos, L. (2020). Digital escape room, using genial. Ly and a breakout to learn algebra at secondary education level in Spain. Education Sciences, 10(10), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kynigos, C., & Diamantidis, D. (2021). Creativity in engineering mathematical models through programming. ZDM, 54(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01314-6
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ values and their choice of tasks: The case of occasioning mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10101-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwenfled, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1984). Creatività e sviluppo mentale. Giunti Barbera.
   Google Scholar
• Maffia, A. (2020). Destinazione bellatrix: Esplora, risolvi e impara la matematica. Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Molad, O., Levenson, E. S., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post–high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09952-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534380
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2018). Creating engaging escaper rooms for the classroom. Childhood Education, 94(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2018.1420363
   Google Scholar
• Riling, M. (2020). Recognizing mathematics students as creative: Mathematical creativity as community-based and possibility-expanding. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202002.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, W. (2017). Lessons learned while escaping from a zombie: Designing a breakout edu game. The History Teacher, 50(4), 553–564. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44507278
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T., & Zazkis, R. (2013). Contingency in the mathematics classroom: Opportunities taken and opportunities missed. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784825
   Google Scholar
• Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1995). The psychoeconomic view of creative work in groups and organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4(4), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.1995.tb00228.x
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1971). Stimulation, enjoyment, and originality in dyadic creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp, A., van de Grint, L., Knippels, M. C., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in education. Educational Research Review, 31, 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vörös, A. I. V., & Sárközi, Z. (2017). Physics escape room as an educational tool. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1916(1), 050002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017455
   Google Scholar
• Xin, W., Wenjing, Y., Dandan, T., & Jiangzhou, S. (2015). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping, 36(7), 2703–2718. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar