Students’ thinking about problem solving tasks: the case of initial value problems

References

• Arslan, S. (2010). Do students really understand what an ordinary differential equation is? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(7), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.486448
   Google Scholar
• Borji, V., & Font, V. (2019). Exploring students’ understanding of integration by parts: A combined Use of APOS and OSA. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106166
   Google Scholar
• Brijlall, D., & Ndlazi, N. J. (2019). Analysing engineering students’ understanding of integration to propose a genetic decomposition. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, P., Novotná, J., Přibyl, J., & Břehovský, J. (2015). The development of a culture of problem solving with secondary students through heuristic strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0150-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, E. (2016). Problem solving and its teaching in mathematics. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6(2), 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, C. D., Davidson, C. I., & Dotger, S. (2018). Development and psychometric testing of the rate and accumulation concept inventory. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 491–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1993). Thoughts in teaching mechanics didactical phenomenology of the concept of force. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274103
   Google Scholar
• Habre, S. (2000). Exploring students’ strategies to solve ordinary differential equations in a reformed setting. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00024-9
   Google Scholar
• Habre, S. (2003). Investigating students’ approval of a geometrical approach to differential equations and their solutions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739031000148912
   Google Scholar
• Hidayati, N., & Permana, D. (2019). Assessment of problem solving abilities and student learning activities based on learning tools: The basis of problem based learning development. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(11), 453–456.
   Google Scholar
• International Study Center. (2021, October 28). How American universities calculate the GPA. https://isc.baylor.edu/blog/us-university-grading-scale.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. (2015b). Secondary students’ quantification of ratio and rate: A framework for reasoning about change in covarying quantities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012). Using student reasoning to inform the development of conceptual learning goals: The case of quadratic functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(2), 85–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.656362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharaj, A. (2014). An APOS analysis of natural science students’ understanding of integration. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1), 54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mallet, D. G., & McCue, S. W. (2009). Constructive development of the solutions of linear equations in introductory ordinary differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(5), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390902759626
   Google Scholar
• Manurung, S. R., & Panggabean, D. D. (2020). Improving students’ thinking ability in physics using interactive multimedia based problem solving. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205
   Google Scholar
• Mkhatshwa, T. (2019). Students’ quantitative reasoning about an absolute extrema optimization problem in a profit maximization context. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1105–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1562116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkhatshwa, T. (2021). A quantitative and covariational reasoning investigation of students’ interpretations of partial derivatives in different contexts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogari, D., & Chirove, M. (2017). Comparing grades 10–12 Mathematics learners’ non-routine problem solving. Eurasia journal of mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4523-4551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munganga, J. M. W., Mwambakana, J. N., Maritz, R., Batubenge, T. A., & Moremedi, G. M. (2014). Introduction of the differential transform method to solve differential equations at undergraduate level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 781–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.877609
   Google Scholar
• Ndlazi, N. J., & Brijlall, D. (2018). Exploring engineering students’ understanding of techniques of integration. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 16(2), 59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrot, M. A. S., & Leong, K. E. (2018). Impact of using graphing calculator in problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it? Princeton. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2012). Development of the heat and energy concept inventory: Preliminary results on the prevalence and persistence of engineering students' misconceptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 412–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. L. (2001). New directions in differential equations: A framework for interpreting students’ understandings and difficulties. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00062-1
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. L., & King, K. D. (2000). Locating starting points in differential equations: A realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073900287219
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, D. R., & Jovanoski, Z. (2004). Student interpretations of the terms in first-order ordinary differential equations in modelling contexts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390410001686607
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1258
   Google Scholar
• Speer, N., & Kung, D. (2016). The complement of RUME: What’s missing from our research? In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th meeting of the MAA special interest group on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 1288–1295). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, P. H., Sampaio, R. R., Santos, L. B., & Cardoso, J. V. (2021). Teaching of ordinary differential equations using the assumptions of the PBL method. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2(2), 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zill, D. G. (2016). Differential equations with boundary-value problems (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar