Design principles of inquiry-oriented tasks in integral calculus

References

• AIBL: inquirybasedlearning.org [Internet]. (2023). San Luis Obispo (CA): AIBL; [cited 2023 Feb 7]. http://www.inquirybasedlearning.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, T. C., Speer, N. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2022). Building bridges: A review and synthesis of research on teaching knowledge for undergraduate instruction in science, engineering, and mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00380-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CBMS: Conference board of the mathematical sciences. (2016). Active learning in post-secondary mathematics education. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S., Murphy, S., Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2016). Divergent definitions of inquiry-based learning in undergraduate mathematics. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, & K. Keene (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 660–665).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Turkey, H., Turki, S., & Kottegoda, Y. (2021). Two implementations of pre-class readings in calculus courses. PRIMUS, 31(2), 210–222.
   Google Scholar
• El Turkey, H., Karakok, G., Cilli-Turner, E., Savic, M., Tang, G., & Satyam, V. R. (2022). A framework for designing creativity-based tasks. In S. A. Chamberlin (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on mathematical creativity and giftedness (MCG 12) (pp. 149–155.
   Google Scholar
• El Turkey, H., Karakok, G., Tang, G., Regier, P., Savić, M., & Cilli-Turner, E. (2020). Tasks to foster mathematical creativity in calculus I. In S. Karunakaran, Z. Reed, & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 579–588).
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1996.9933425
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034002003
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: A case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9269-9
   Google Scholar
• Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Keene, K., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2018). Inquiry-Oriented instruction: A conceptualization of the instructional principles. PRIMUS. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1338807
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M. L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naccarato, E., & Karakok, G. (2015). Expectations and implementations of the flipped classroom model in undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(7), 968–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1071440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PCAST: President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Report to the president: Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B. (2009). Negativity’ and learner identity: Classroom tasks, the ‘minus sign’ and classroom environments in English, French and German classrooms. In J. Maass & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education—New research results (pp. 179–196). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: Instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Satyam, V. R., Savic, M., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., & Karakok, G. (2022). Teacher actions to foster creativity in calculus. In S. Karunakaran & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 536–544).
   Google Scholar
• Savic, M., Karakok, G., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., & Naccarato, E. (2017). Formative assessment of creativity in undergraduate mathematics: Using a creativity-in-progress rubric (CPR) on proving. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness. Advances in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_3
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. M., Voigt, M., Ström, A., Webb, D., & Martin, W. G. (2021). Transformational change efforts: Student engagement in mathematics through an institutional network for active learning. AMS.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2021). Why inquiry-based approaches harm students’ learning. CIS Education Program. The Center for Educational Studies, Analysis Paper 24. https://www.cis.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ap24.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thanheiser, E. (2017). Commentary on mathematical tasks and the student: Coherence and connectedness of mathematics, cycles of task design, and context of implementation. ZDM, 49(6), 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0895-z
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L II, Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Ohtani, M., eds. (2015). Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wawro, M. (2015). Reasoning about solutions in linear algebra: The case of Abraham and the invertible matrix theorem. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0017-7
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding mathematics textbooks through reader-oriented theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9264-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, G. H. (1992). The role of reflection in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(5), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571471
   Google Scholar
• Yoshinobu, S., & Jones, M. G. (2012). The coverage issue. PRIMUS, 22(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2010.507622
   Google Scholar