Naturalism in Economics

References

• Albury, R., G. Payne, and W. Suchting. “Naturalism and the Human Sciences.” Economy and Society 10 (August 1981): 367–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, T. “Realism and Social Science.” Radical Philosophy 27 (Spring 1981): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. “The Counter-Enlightenment.” In Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science. 2d ed. Brighton: Harvester, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. ScientifIC Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, L. The Foundations of Economic Method. London: Allen and Unwin, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Carabelli, A. On Keynes’s Method. London: Macmillan, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. What Is This Thing Called Science? Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. “Is Bhaskar’s Realism Realistic?” Radical Philosophy 49 (Summer 1988): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. J. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London: Macmillan, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. “Keynes and Organicism.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (Winter 1989-90): 308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. “Post-Keynesianism as Political Economy: A Methodological Discussion.” Review of Political Economy 2 (November 1990): 345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, A. S. “Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science.” Journal of Economic Issues 17 (June 1983): 507–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: An Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, R. “Marxism and Philosophy: A Critique of Critical Realism.” Capital and Class 37 (Spring 1989): 87–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. In Praise of Economic Theory. London: University College, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R., and P. Secord. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. The Structure of ScientifIC Inference. London: Macmillan, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. “Institutional Economic Theory: The Old Versus the New.” Review of Political Economy 1 (November 1989): 249–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, M., and E. J. Nell. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, W. A. “Culture, Society and Economic Theory.” Review of Political Economy 5 (October 1993): 453–469.
   Google Scholar
• Keat, R. “Positivism, Naturalism and Anti-naturalism in the Social Sciences.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1 (April 1971): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. “Towards a New Research Programme for Post-Keynesianism and Neo-Ricardianism.” Review of Political Economy 4 (January 1992): 37–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. “Uncertainty and Economic Analysis.” Economic Journal 95 (December 1985): 909–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. “Abstraction, Tendencies and Stylized Facts: A Realist Approach to Economic Analysis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13 (March 1989): 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layder, D. “Beyond Empiricism? The Promise of Realism.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (September 1985): 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. “Neither Fundamentalism nor ‘New Realism’: A Critical Realist Perspective on Current Divisions in Socialist Theory.” Capital and Class 42 (Winter 1990): 30–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. Individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. “How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 4 (April 1988): 89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. “Scientific Realism and Austrian Explanation.” Review of Political Economy 2 (November 1990): 310–344.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. “Economics with Institutions: Agenda for Methodological Enquiry.” In Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology, edited by U. Maki, B. Gustafsson, and C. Knudsen. London: Routledge, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, A. “Culture: Core Concept Under Attack.” Journal of Economic Issues 21 (June 1987): 587–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. “The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 21 (September 1987): 1001–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mises, L. Von. The mtimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, W. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. London: Macmillan, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. “What are the Questions?” Journal of Economic Literature 15 (December 1977): 1318–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotheim, R. J. “Organicism and the Role of the Individual in Keynes’ Thought.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (Winter 1989-90): 316–326.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. “What is Wrong with the New Institutional Economics (and What is Still Wrong with the Old)?” Review of Political Economy 1 (November 1989): 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. “’The Self-Referentiability of Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of the Preconceptions of Economic Science.” Journal of Economic Issues 24 (September 1990): 695–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. “’Truth’ and ‘Discourse’ in the Social Construction of Economic Reality: An Essay on the Relation of Knowledge to Socioeconomic Policy.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 13 (Summer 1991): 511–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. “In (Limited but Affirmative) Defence of Nihilism.” Review of Political Economy 5 (April 1993): 236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. “Theory and Realism: A Reply.” American Economic Review 54 (September 1964): 736–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. 2d ed. London: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, S. Reality and Reason: Dialectic and the Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. Culture. London: Fontana Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar