Strategies for Maintaining Market Power in the Face of Rapidly Changing Technologies

References

• Bernard, J., G. Cattaneo, R. Mansell, R. Silverstone, and W. E. Steinmueller. “The Way Forward: Advanced Communication, Economic Growth and Social Development in Europe.” Final Report for the European Commission ACTS FAIR project AC093, June 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. “Adapt the Internet Interconnect Model.” Communicaticns Week International (July 10, 1995): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, M., and M. Shurmer. “Business Strategy and Regulation of Multimedia in the UK.” Communications and Strategies 19, no. 3 (1995): 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. D. “Adding Service Discrimination to the Internet.” Telecommunications Policy 20, no. 3 (1996): 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M. Competition as a Dynamic Process. New York: The Brookings Institution 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, G. Tracking Internet Infrastructure: A Handbook on Business, Technology and Structural Issues Reshaping the Landscape of the Commercial Internet. Ewing, N.J., 1996, http://pobox.com/cook/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. “Regulatory Transparency in the Internal Market for Information Society Services.” Communication to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the Economic and Social Committee. Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive amending for the third time Directive 83/189/EEC laying down the procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations, Brussels, July 24, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., R. Mansell, and J. Skea, eds. Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness: The Politics and Economics of Standards in Natural and Technical Environments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, R. B. The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, J. “Hundt Asks Network Reliability and Interoperability Council to Monitor Impact of Internet Growth on Public Networks.” Federal Communications Commission, URL, 1996. http:/bureaus/engineering_technology/news_releases/nret6011.txt
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. “Regulating Europe: Problems and Prospects.” Jahrbuch zur Staatsund Verwaltungswissenschaft 3 (1989): 159–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R. The New Telecommunications: A Political Economy of Network Evolution. London: Sage, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R. “Advanced Communication Technologies and Services: Design Configuration and Stakeholder Interests in Europe” Telematics and Informatics (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., A. Davies, and W. Hulsink. The New Telecommunications in the Netherlands: Strategic Developments in Technologies and Markets. The Hague: Rathenau Institute (formerly Netherlands Office of Technology Assessment), 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., and R. Silverstone. Communication by Design: The Politics of information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., and W. E. Steinmueller. “Intellectual Property Rights: The Development of information Infrastructures for the Information Society: Final Report.” Prepared for the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Programme of the European Parliament, Maastricht, MERIT, October 17, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., and W. E. Steinmueller. “The Way Forward: Socio-economic and Policy Issues in Advanced Communication Technologies and Services.” A report for the European Commission ACTS FAIR project AC093, March 5, 1996 (URL http://www.analysys.co.uk/acts/fair).
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, F., and R. Mansell. “Utilities in the EC: A Regime in Transition.” Futures (January-February 1992): 65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melody, W. H. “The Information Society: Implications for Economic Institutions and Market Theory.” Journal of Economic Issues 19, no. 2 (1985): 523–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melody, W. H. “Objectives and Models of Telecom Regulation.” In Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practice, edited by W.H. Melody. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 1996: 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Noam, E. “Beyond Liberalization I: From the Network of Networks to the System of Systems.” Telecommunications Policy 18, no. 4 (1994a): 286–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noam, E. “Beyond Liberalization I: Reforming Universal Service.” Telecommunications Policy 18, no. 9 (1994b): 687–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. “Information Infrastructure Convergence and Pricing: The Internet.” Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies, Paris, December 11, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, P. E. “General Information About the Internet II Project.” Coalition for Networked Information, Washington, D.C., October 15, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. “Nynex Losses Reduced to £90m.” Financial Times (February 29, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Snoddy, R. “Cable Firm to Market Speedier Internet Access.” Financial Times (March 1, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Spectrum Strategy Consultants. Development of the Information Society: An International Analysis. A report for the Department of Trade and Industry, London, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, H. “Telecommunications Competition & Strategic Partnerships.” The 1996 European Communications, Summit, Newport, September 8, 1996.
   Google Scholar