60
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
The Veblen-Commons Award

Human Agency, Cumulative Causation, and the State

Pages 239-251 | Published online: 05 Jan 2016

References

  • Albert, Alexa, and Yngve Ramstad. “Social Psychological Underpinnings of Commons’s Institutional Economics: The Significance of Dewey’s Human Nature and Conduct.” Journal of Economic Issues 31, no. 4 (December 1997): 881–916.
  • Albert, Alexa, and Yngve Ramstad. “Social Psychological Underpinnings of Commons’s Institutional Economics II.” Journal of Economic Issues 32, no. 1 (March 1998): 1–46.
  • Barber, William J. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921-1933. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Barber, William J. Design Within Disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Economists, and the Shaping of American Economic Policy, 1933-1945. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Becker, Gary S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
  • Chasse, John Dennis. “John R. Commons and the Democratic State.” Journal of Economic Issues 20, no. 3 (September 1986): 759–784.
  • Giddens, Anthony. New Rules of Sociological Methods. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
  • Harvey, John T., and Michael A. Katovich. “Symbolic Interactionism and Institutionalism: Common Roots.” Journal of Economic Issues 26, no. 3 (September 1992).
  • Heath, Anthony. Rational Choice and Social Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, 3.
  • Hirshleifer, Jack. “The Expanding Domain of Economics, ” American Economic Review 75 (December 1985): 58–68.
  • Hodgson, Geoffrey. “What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 34, no. 2 (June 2000): 317–330.
  • Leaf, Murray J. Man, Mind, and Science: A History of Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.
  • LeClair, E. E., and H. K. Schneider. Economic Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.
  • Mayhew, Anne. “Atomistic and Cultural Analyses in Economic Anthropology: An Old Argument Repeated.” In Institutional Economics: Contributions to the Development of Holistic Economics, edited by John Adams. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980.
  • McClintock, Brent. “International Trade and the Governance of Local Markets.” In Political Economy for the 21st Century, edited by Charles J. Whalen.Armonk, N.Y., and London: M. E. Sharpe, 1996.
  • Mitchell, Wesley C. “Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory.” The American Economic Review 15 (March 1925): 1–12. Reprinted in The Backward Art of the Spending Money. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1950.
  • Morgan, Mary S., and Malcolm Rutherford. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Formalism, Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy. Durham and London, Duke University Press, 1998.
  • Myrdal, Gunnar. An American Dilemma. New York: Harper, 1944.
  • Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart & Co. Inc., 1944.
  • Rucker, Darnell. The Chicago Pragmatists. Minneapolis, Minn.: The University of Minnesota Press, 1969.
  • Rutherford, Malcolm. “Institutionalism between the Wars.” Journal of Economic Issues 34, no. 2 (June 2000): 291–303.
  • Samuels, Warren J., ed. Fundamentals of the Economic Role of Government. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.
  • Samuels, Warren J. Essays on the Economic Role of Government. Vols. 1 & 2. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 1992.
  • Skocpol, Theda. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Stanfield, James Ronald. “The Dichotomized State.” Journal of Economic Issues 25, no. 3 (September 1991): 765–780.
  • Veblen, Thorstein B. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Reprint. In The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. New Bruswick, N.J., Transaction Publishers, 1990. (Originally published in 1989 in The Quarterly Journal of Economics.)
  • Wrong, D.H. “The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology.” American Sociological Review 26 (1961): 183–93.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.