The Use of Power Blocs of Integrated Corporate Directorships to Articulate a Power Structure: Case Study and Research Recommendations

References

• Astley, W. G., and P. S. Sachdeva. “Structural Sources of Interorganizational Power: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Academy of Management Review 9, no. 2 (1984): 104–113.
   Google Scholar
• Berle, Adolf A., and Gardiner C. Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property.New York: MacMillan Company, 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, David M., and David A. Whetten. “Effects of Organizational Strategies and Contextual Constraints on Centrality and Attributions of Influence in Interorganizational Networks.” AdministrativeScience Quarterly 26, no. 3 (September 1981): 378–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, Phillip. “Technique for Analyzing Overlapping Memberships.” In Sociological Methodobgy, edited by Herbert L. Costner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1972, 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, Phillip. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology 92, no. 5 (March 1987): 1170–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman. UCINETIV Version 1.0.Columbia: Analytic Technologies, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, Robert A. Business as a System of Power.New York: Columbia University Press, 1943.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, Daniel J., and Marlene E. Burkhardt. “Potential Power and Power Use: An Investigation of Structure and Behavior. Academy of Management Journal 36, no. 3 (June 1993): 441–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, AndySeungwha. “Performance Effects of Cooperative Strategies among Investment Banking Firms: A Loglinear Analysis of Organizational Exchange Networks.” Social Networks 18, no. 2 (April 1996): 121–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daboub, Anthony J. et al. “Top Management Team Characteristics and Corporate Illegal Activity.” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1 (January 1995): 138–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Moines Register, 30 July 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Directory of Corporate Affiliations. New Providence, N.J.: National Register Publishing, 1998. Internet: LexisNexis, Directory of Corporate Affiliations, BUSREF/DCA, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Disclosure® Online Database. Internet: LexisNexis, COMPNY/DISCLO, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Domhoff, William G. The Power Elite and the State: How Policy Is Made in America.New York: Adline DeGruyter, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, Peter C. “The Interlocking Directorate.” American Economic Review 59, no. 3 (June 1969): 314–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, Robert J. Nuclear Politics in America: A History and Theory of Government Regulation.Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• EdgarPlus. Internet: LexisNexis, COMPNY/EDGARP, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar Databases. Internet: US Securities and Exchange Commission, <http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml>, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, Wolfram. “A Single Theory of Cooperative Industrial Policy: Model Building and Practical Experience.” In Industrial Policies after 2000, edited by Wolfram Eisner and John Groenewegen, 113–143.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000a.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, Wolfram. “An Industrial Policy Agenda 2000 and Beyond—Experience, Theory, and Policy.” In Industrial Policies after 2000, edited by Wolfram Eisner and John Groenewegan. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000b, 411–486.
   Google Scholar
• Enteman, Willard F. Managerialsim: The Emergence of a New Ideology.London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, Martin G. “An Extension of EBLOC to Valued Graphs.” Social Networks 5, no. 4 (December 1983): 395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Post Directory of Directors. Internet: LexisNexis, BUSREF/FPDIR, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Kenneth A. “Mapping Interactions within and between Cohesive Groups.” Social Networks 18, no. 2 (April 1996): 93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Linton C. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1, no. 3 (February 1979): 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, John. “Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77 (June 1982): 304–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geweke, John. “Measurement of Conditional Linear Dependence and Feedback between Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, no. 388 (December 1984): 907–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, John. “Introduction: Industrial Policy; Issues, Theories, and Instruments.” In Industrial Policies 2000, edited by Wolfram Eisner and John Groenewegen. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, Ranjay, and James D. Westphal. “Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44, no. 3 (September 1999): 473–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, Per, and Frank Harary. Structural Models in Anthropology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, F. Gregory, and Kurt Stephenson. “Corporate Networks: A U.S. Case Study.” In Dynamics of the Firm: Strategies of Pricing and Organization, edited by John Groenewegan.Northampton: Edward Elgar, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, F. Gregory, and Steve R. Bolduc. “Contracts and Costs in a Corporate/Government System Dynamics Network: A United States Case.” In Industrial Policies After 2000, edited by Wolfram Eisner and John Groenewegen, 235–284.Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• McCool, Daniel. “The Subsystem Family of Concepts: A Critique and a Proposal.” Political Research Quarterly 51, no. 2 (June 1998). 551–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, Gardiner C. The Structure of the American Economy. 1939. Reprint.New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, Beth, and Michael Schwartz. The Power Structure of American Business.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, Mark. The American Corporate Network.Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Mokken, R. J. “Cliques, Club, and Clans.” Quality and Quantity 13, no. 2 (April 1979): 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munkirs, John R. The Transformation of American Capitalism: From Competitive Market Structures to Centralized Private Sector Planning.New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Munkirs, John R. et al. “The Automobile Industry, Political Economy, and a New World Order.” Journal of Economic Issues 27, no. 2 (June 1993): 627–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munkirs, John R., and James I. Sturgeon. “Oligopolistic Cooperation: Conceptual and Empirical Evidence of Market Structure Evolution.” Journal of Economic Issues 19, no. 4 (December 1985): 899–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody’s Bank and Finance Manual.New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s Industrial Manual.New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s Municipal and Government ManualNew York: Moody’s Investors Service, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s OTC Industrial Manual.New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s Public Utility Manual.New York: Moody’s Investors Service, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, George W. Fighting LiberalLincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Omaha World Herald, 19–24 April 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, Stephen, and Brian Foster. “A Graph-Theoretic Generalization of the Clique Concept.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 6, no. 1 (1978): 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard & Poor’s Register of Corporations, Directors, and Executives. New York: Standard <Sl Poor’s Corp, 1998. Internet: LexisNexis, Standard and Poor’s Register of Corporations, COMPNY/SPCORP, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Standard and Poor’s Corporation Descriptions Plus News. Internet: LexisNexis, COMPNY/SPDESC, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, Karen, and Marvin Zelen. “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Examples.” Social Networks 11 (March 1989): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, Kurt, and F. Gregory Hayden. “Comparison of the Corporate Decision Networks of Nebraska and the United States.” Journal of Economic Issues 29, no. 3 (September 1995): 843–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, Diane L. “Addressing A Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model.” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1 (January 1995): 43–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson Bank Directory. Internet: LexisNexis, BUSREF/TBUS, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Trebing, Harry M., and Maurice Estabrooks. “AT&T’s Grand Design for Dominance in the Global Information Age.” In Market Dominance: How Firms Gain, Hold, or Lose It and the Impact on Economic Performance, edited by David I. Rosenbaum.Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1998, 195–255.
   Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal, 23 April 2001.
   Google Scholar