De-Collectivization in Czech and Slovak Agriculture: An Institutional Explanation

References

• Alchian, A., and H. Demsetz. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62 (1972): 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aligicia, P. “The Institutionalists’ Take on Transition.” Transition 3, no. 5 (1997): 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, D. J. “Microeconomic Institutions and the Transformation of Agribusiness: Evidence from the Czech Republic.” Eastern European Countryside, no. 5 (1999): 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, D. J. “Credit Allocation and Farm Structures in Czech Agriculture, 1993-1997.” Comparative Economic Studies (forthcoming, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger, H., and M. Rosenzweig. “Behavioral and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture.” Journal of Development Studies 22, no. 3 (1986): 502–539.
   Google Scholar
• Csaki, C., and Z. Lerman. “Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in the Former Socialist Countries in Europe.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 21 (1994): 553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csaki, C., M. Debatisse, and O. Honisch. “Food and Agriculture in the Czech Republic: From a Velvet Transition to the Challenges of EU Accession.” World Bank Technical Paper, no. 437.Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cungu, A., and J. Swinnen. “Albania’s Radical Agrarian Reform.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 47, no. 3 (1999): 605–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deininger, K. “Collective Agricultural Production: A Solution for Transitional Economies?” World Development 23, no. 8 (1995): 1317–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divila, E., and Z. Sokol. “The Conception Questions of Forming New Entrepreneurial Subjects in the Czech Agriculture.” Prague Economic Papers, no. 3 (1993): 261–274.
   Google Scholar
• Dostál, P. Post-Communist Transformation, Regional Development, and Ethnonational Aspirations: Studies on Institutional and Geographical Differentiation. Ph.D. thesis, Centrale Drukkerij Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. “The New Institutionalism: New but Not Institutionalist.” Journal of Economic Issues 14, no. 2 (1990): 423–431.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. and A. Dowlah. “Transition Crises in the Post-Soviet Era.” Journal of Economic Issues 27, no. 2 (1993): 527–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. “Agricultural Situation and Prospects in the Central and Eastern European Countries: Czech Republic.” Working paper, Directorate-General for Agriculture of the European Commission, Brussels, 1998a.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. “Agricultural Situation and Prospects in the Central and Eastern European Countries: Slovak Republic.” Working paper, Directorate-General for Agriculture of the European Commission, Brussels, 1998b.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, T. “Some Aspects of Integration of Western and Eastern Europe.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 21 (1994): 393–406.
   Google Scholar
• Gow, H., D. Streeter, and J. Swinnen. “How Private Contract Enforcement Mechanisms Can Succeed where Public Institutions Fail: The Case of Juhocukor A. S.” Agricultural Economics 23, no. 3 (2000): 253–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, J., C. Pitelis, and S-E Sjostrand, eds. On Economic Institutions: Theory and Applications.Aldershot, U.K.: Elgar, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, K. “Gedanken zur Transformation einer Sozialistischen Agrarfassung.” Agrarwirtschaft 40 (1991): 138–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn, K. “Institutions and Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 27 (1993): 849–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayami, Y., and K. Otsuka. The Economics of Contract Choice: An Agrarian Perspective.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. Economics and Institutions.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. “Total Productivity of Emergent Farm Structures in Central and Eastern Europe.” Report on the EU DG VI FAIR Project, Task 2.Kent, UK: University of London, Wye College, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund, World Bank, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. A Study of the Soviet Economy. Vol. 3.Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Kabat, L., and K. Hagedorn. “Privatization and Decollectivization and Resulting Structural Changes in Slovakia.” In Agricultural Privatization, Land Reform, and Farm Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by J. M. F. Swinnen. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kaizrlik, V. Zur. “Transformation der tschechischen Landwirtschaft.” In Privatisierungsprozess, Rechtsformen und Betriebsstrukturen im Agrarbereich der mittel und osteuropaische Lander, edited by P. Tillack, and E. Schulze. Halle: IAMO, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Karlik, J. “Questions of Ownership and Use of Land and Other Agricultural Means in Agricultural Cooperatives.” Prague Economic Papers, no. 3 (1993): 264–283.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, Z., C. Csaki, and G. Feder. Land Policies and Evolving Farm Structures in Transition Countries.Washington, D.C.: World Bank Working Paper 2794, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, P. “A New-Institutionalist Story about the Transformation of Former Socialist Economies: A Recounting and an Assessment.” Journal of Economic Issues 30, no. 1 (1996): 243–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemans, I. “Process and Politics of Agricultural Privatization in the Czech and Slovak Republics.” In Political Economy of Agrarian Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by J. F. M. Swinnen. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Machness, Y., and A. Schnytzer. “Risk and the Collective farm in Transition.” In Agricultural Co-operatives in Transition, edited by C. Csaki and Y. Kislev. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mathijs, E. “Essays on Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Ph.D. diss., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Mathijs, E. “Perspectives on Restructuring during Transition.” Paper presented at the KATO symposium, Berlin, November 2–4, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (MACR). Basic Principles of the Agricultural Policies of the Government of Czech Republic up to 1995 and for a Further Period.Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (MACR). “Zprava O Stavu Zemedelstvi CR Za Rok 19~. ‘Zelena Zprava”’ (annual agricultural reports). Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic (MASR). “The Concept and Principles of Agrarian Policy.”Bratislava: Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic (MASR). “Report on Agriculture and Food Sector in the Slovak Republic 19-.”Bratislava: Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic, 1995, 1996, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Review of Agricultural Policies: Czech Republic.Paris: Centre for Co-operation with Economies in Transition of the OECD, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Agricultural Policies, Markets, and Trade in Transition Economies: Monitoring and Evaluation 1996, 1991.Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 1996, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Review of Agricultural Policies: Slovak Republic.Paris: Centre for Co-operation with Economies in Transition of the OECD, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Poirot, C. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Transitional Environment: Romania, 1989-1994.” Journal of Economic Issues 30, no. 4 (1996): 1057–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poliak, R. “A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households.” Journal of Economic Literature 23 (1985): 581–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, F. The Red and the Green: The Rise and Fall of Collectivized Agriculture.New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. “The Old and the New Institutionalism: Can Bridges Be Built?” Journal of Economic Issues 29, no. 2 (1995): 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarris, A, T. Doucha, and E. Matijs. “Agricultural Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications for Competitiveness and Rural Development.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 26, no. 3 (1999): 305–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlack, R. “Going to Market in Bulgaria: Uphill On a Knife Edge.” Journal of Economic Issues 27, no. 2 (1993): 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlack, R. “Economies in Transition: Hypotheses Towards a Reasonable Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 30, no. 2 (1996): 707–732.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, G. “Why Collectivization of Agriculture in Socialist Countries Has Failed: A Transaction Cost Approach.” In Agricultural Co-operatives in Transition, edited by C. Csakiand Y. KislevBoulder: Westview Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Swaan, W., and M. Lissowska. “Capabilities, Routines, and East European Economic Reform.” Journal of Economic Issues 30, no. 4 (1996): 1031–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, N. “Agricultural Restitution and Co-operative Transformation in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia.” Europe-Asia Studies 51, no. 7 (1999): 1199–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen, J., and E. Mathijs. “The New Farming Structures in the CEECs.” Paper presented at the policy workshop for CEE and NIS, Beyond Transition: Ten Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, at The Hague, The Netherlands, October 11–15, 1999. Organized by the Regional Bureau for Europe and the CIS of the UNDP and the Institute of Social Studies at The Hague, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tawney, R. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism.London: Butler and Tanner, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.London: George Allen <Sl Unwin, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Wisman, J., and J. Rozansky. “The Methodology of Institutionalism Revisited.” Journal of Economic Issues 25, no. 3 (1991): 709–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolz, A., G. Blaas, I. Namerova, and S. Buchta. “Agricultural Transformation in Slovakia: the Change of Institutions and Organizations.” Heidelberg Studies in Applied Economics and Rural Institutions 29. Saarbrücken, Germany: 1998. Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. “Farm Restructuring and Land Tenure in Reforming Socialist Economies. A Comparative Analysis of Eastern and Central Europe.” World Bank Discussion Papers 268.Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995.
   Google Scholar